Hyperelastic Material Properties of Mouse Skin under Compression

The skin is a dynamic organ whose complex material properties are capable of withstanding continuous mechanical stress while accommodating insults and organism growth. Moreover, synchronized hair cycles, comprising waves of hair growth, regression and rest, are accompanied by dramatic fluctuations in skin thickness in mice. Whether such structural changes alter skin mechanics is unknown. Mouse models are extensively used to study skin biology and pathophysiology, including aging, UV-induced skin damage and somatosensory signaling. As the skin serves a pivotal role in the transfer function from sensory stimuli to neuronal signaling, we sought to define the mechanical properties of mouse skin over a range of normal physiological states. Skin thickness, stiffness and modulus were quantitatively surveyed in adult, female mice (Mus musculus). These measures were analyzed under uniaxial compression, which is relevant for touch reception and compression injuries, rather than tension, which is typically used to analyze skin mechanics. Compression tests were performed with 105 full-thickness, freshly isolated specimens from the hairy skin of the hind limb. Physiological variables included body weight, hair-cycle stage, maturity level, skin site and individual animal differences. Skin thickness and stiffness were dominated by hair-cycle stage at young (6–10 weeks) and intermediate (13–19 weeks) adult ages but by body weight in mature mice (26–34 weeks). Interestingly, stiffness varied inversely with thickness so that hyperelastic modulus was consistent across hair-cycle stages and body weights. By contrast, the mechanics of hairy skin differs markedly with anatomical location. In particular, skin containing fascial structures such as nerves and blood vessels showed significantly greater modulus than adjacent sites. Collectively, this systematic survey indicates that, although its structure changes dramatically throughout adult life, mouse skin at a given location maintains a constant elastic modulus to compression throughout normal physiological stages.

[1]  C. Daly Biomechanical properties of dermis. , 1982, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[2]  T. Battaglia GDF-5 deficiency alters stress-relaxation properties in mouse skin. , 2005, Journal of dermatological science.

[3]  C. A. Foster Differential effects of tissue processing on human embryonic and fetal skin , 1987, The Anatomical record.

[4]  J T Whitton,et al.  New values for epidermal thickness and their importance. , 1973, Health physics.

[5]  J. Lévêque,et al.  Age-related mechanical properties of human skin: an in vivo study. , 1989, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[6]  M. Visscher,et al.  Effect of dermal thickness, tissue composition, and body site on skin biomechanical properties , 2006, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[7]  Rabih Moshourab,et al.  A stomatin-domain protein essential for touch sensation in the mouse , 2007, Nature.

[8]  Katharina Zimmermann,et al.  Phenotyping sensory nerve endings in vitro in the mouse , 2009, Nature Protocols.

[9]  D. Corey,et al.  TRPA1 Modulates Mechanotransduction in Cutaneous Sensory Neurons , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  F. Noonan,et al.  Functional melanocortin 1 receptor Mc1r is not necessary for an inflammatory response to UV radiation in adult mouse skin , 2013, Experimental dermatology.

[11]  M. Kripke,et al.  Sunlight and skin cancer: Inhibition of p53 mutations in UV-irradiated mouse skin by sunscreens , 1997, Nature Medicine.

[12]  Maria A. Serrat,et al.  Alterations in the Mechanical Properties and Composition of Skin in Human Growth Hormone Transgenic Mice , 2007, Connective tissue research.

[13]  A. W. Schopper,et al.  Nonlinear and viscoelastic characteristics of skin under compression: experiment and analysis. , 2003, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[14]  Gerhard A. Holzapfel,et al.  Nonlinear Solid Mechanics: A Continuum Approach for Engineering Science , 2000 .

[15]  Wenqin Luo,et al.  The Functional Organization of Cutaneous Low-Threshold Mechanosensory Neurons , 2011, Cell.

[16]  N. Krueger,et al.  Age‐related changes in skin mechanical properties: a quantitative evaluation of 120 female subjects , 2011, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[17]  G. J. Gerling,et al.  The regularity of sustained firing reveals two populations of slowly adapting touch receptors in mouse hairy skin. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  R. Kent,et al.  The transient relationship between pressure and volume in the pediatric pulmonary system. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Han Huang,et al.  Elastic modulus and viscoelastic properties of full thickness skin characterised at micro scales. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[20]  C H Daly,et al.  Age-related changes in the mechanical properties of human skin. , 1979, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[21]  van Dh Dick Campen,et al.  A mixture approach to the mechanics of skin. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Y. Lanir,et al.  Effects of Strain Level and Proteoglycan Depletion on Preconditioning and Viscoelastic Responses of Rat Dorsal Skin , 2001, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Cheng-Ming Chuong,et al.  Complex hair cycle domain patterns and regenerative hair waves in living rodents. , 2008, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[24]  Randall B Widelitz,et al.  Analyses of regenerative wave patterns in adult hair follicle populations reveal macro-environmental regulation of stem cell activity. , 2009, The International journal of developmental biology.

[25]  Y Lanir,et al.  Two-dimensional mechanical properties of rabbit skin. II. Experimental results. , 1974, Journal of Biomechanics.

[26]  Guozheng Kang,et al.  Ratchetting of porcine skin under uniaxial cyclic loading. , 2011, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[27]  R Paus,et al.  A comprehensive guide for the accurate classification of murine hair follicles in distinct hair cycle stages. , 2001, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[28]  Ruth E. Baker,et al.  Cyclic dermal BMP signalling regulates stem cell activation during hair regeneration , 2008, Nature.

[29]  C. Stucky,et al.  Receptive properties of mouse sensory neurons innervating hairy skin. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Y Lanir,et al.  Two-dimensional mechanical properties of rabbit skin. I. Experimental system. , 1974, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  B. Donose,et al.  The viscoelastic, hyperelastic and scale dependent behaviour of freshly excised individual skin layers. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[32]  Yuxiang Wang,et al.  Natural variation in skin thickness argues for mechanical stimulus control by force instead of displacement , 2013, 2013 World Haptics Conference (WHC).