The ASGE guidelines for the appropriate use of colonoscopy in an open access system

Abstract Background: Appropriateness of indications is essential to the rational utilization of resources. The aim of this study was to evaluate the appropriate use of colonoscopy in an open access system and to assess whether the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines are useful in clinical practice. Methods: The indication for colonoscopy was assessed on 3000 consecutive examinations performed at 7 institutions. Results: The rate of colonoscopies "generally not indicated" according to the ASGE guidelines was 24.5% for outpatients and 15.5% for inpatients; the rates of examinations performed for an indication not listed in the ASGE guidelines were 12% and 20.1%, respectively. Generally not indicated colonoscopies were significantly less frequent for procedures requested by gastroenterologists or family physicians than those requested by other specialists, but were similar. Most generally not indicated examinations requested by gastroenterologists were for routine follow-up of patients with inflammatory bowel disease; when these patients were excluded, the rate of generally not indicated endoscopies requested by gastroenterologists was also lower than the corresponding rate for examinations requested by family physicians. Conclusions: In Italy, the rate of colonoscopies performed for generally not indicated reasons is high, particularly among examinations not requested by a gastroenterologist. Many colonoscopies are performed for indications not listed in the ASGE guidelines. (Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:39-44.)

[1]  R. Brook,et al.  Performance of panel-based criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of colonoscopy: a prospective study. , 1998, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[2]  R. Brook,et al.  Reliability of panel-based guidelines for colonoscopy: an international comparison. , 1998, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[3]  G. Zuccaro.  Treatment and referral guidelines in gastroenterology. , 1997, Gastroenterology clinics of North America.

[4]  C. Mulrow,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. , 1997, Gastroenterology.

[5]  G. Zuccaro,et al.  Does an open access system properly utilize endoscopic resources? , 1997, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[6]  T. Byers,et al.  American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: Update 1997 , 1997 .

[7]  J. Marshall,et al.  Appropriateness of referrals for open-access endoscopy. How do physicians in different medical specialties do? , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[8]  R H Brook,et al.  Appropriateness and Diagnostic Yield of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in an Open-Access Endoscopy Unit , 1996, Endoscopy.

[9]  A. Formenti,et al.  The ASGE guidelines for the appropriate use of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open access system. , 1995, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[10]  A. Axon,et al.  Guidelines on appropriate indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy , 1995, BMJ.

[11]  H. Devlin,et al.  Appropriate use of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy--a prospective audit. Steering Group of the Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Audit Committee. , 1994, Gut.

[12]  K. Kahn,et al.  Assigning Appropriateness Ratings for Diagnostic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Using Two Different Approaches , 1992, Medical care.

[13]  B. Scott.  Endoscopic demands in the 90's. , 1990, Gut.

[14]  R. Brook,et al.  Overuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a country with open-access endoscopy: a prospective study in primary care. , 1997, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.