Blind tests shed light on possibilities and limitations for identifying stone tool prehension and hafting

Prehensile wear has never formed the focus of a blind test in microwear studies and doubts remain about the formation, identification and interpretation of diagnostic prehension and hafting wear. The results of the presented blind tests demonstrate that prehension and hafting traces do form and that their formation is sufficiently systematic and patterned to allow valid and reliable interpretations. A combined approach, involving macroscopic, low power and high power analyses, is suggested as the most meaningful approach for consistent inferences.

[1]  P. V. Peer,et al.  A Story of Colourful Diggers and Grinders. The Sangoan and Lupemban at site 8-B-11, Sai Island, Northern Sudan , 2004 .

[2]  Veerle Rots,et al.  Wear Traces and the Interpretation of Stone Tools , 2005 .

[3]  P. Vermeersch,et al.  Experimental hafting traces. Identification and characteristics , 2001 .

[4]  J. Shea.  On Accuracy and Revelance in Lithic Use-wear Analysis , 1987 .

[5]  Veerle Rots,et al.  Towards an understanding of hafting: the macro- and microscopic evidence , 2003, Antiquity.

[6]  George H. Odell,et al.  The Mechanics of Use-Breakage of Stone Tools: Some Testable Hypotheses , 1981 .

[7]  Veerle Rots,et al.  Prehensile Wear on Flint Tools , 2004 .

[8]  Mark H Newcomer,et al.  Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests , 1986 .

[9]  R. Fullagar.  A closer look : recent Australian studies of stone tools , 1998 .

[10]  L. H. Keeley,et al.  Microwear analysis of experimental flint tools: a test case , 1977 .

[11]  G. Odell.  The application of micro-wear analysis to the lithic component of an entire prehistoric settlement : methods, problems and functional reconstructions , 1979 .

[12]  L Pirnay,et al.  Microwear analysis of experimental stone tools: further test results , 1982 .

[13]  George H. Odell,et al.  Verifying the Reliability of Lithic Use-Wear Assessments by ‘Blind Tests’: the Low-Power Approach , 1980 .

[14]  L. Wadley,et al.  The first residue analysis blind tests: results and lessons learnt , 2004 .

[15]  T. Loy.  Prehistoric Blood Residues: Detection on Tool Surfaces and Identification of Species of Origin , 1983, Science.

[16]  P. V. Peer,et al.  Early evidence of complexity in lithic economy: core-axe production, hafting and use at Late Middle Pleistocene site 8-B-11, Sai Island (Sudan) , 2006 .

[17]  Douglas B. Bamforth,et al.  Ambiguous Use Traces and Blind Test Results: New Data , 1990 .

[18]  G. Odell.  Toward a More Behavioral Approach to Archaeological Lithic Concentrations , 1980, American Antiquity.

[19]  Veerle Rots,et al.  Bright Spots and the Question of Hafting , 2002 .

[20]  G. Odell,et al.  Experimentation in the Formation of Edge Damage: A New Approach to Lithic Analysis , 1974 .

[21]  Lawrence H. Keeley,et al.  Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses: A Microwear Analysis , 1979 .

[22]  Veerle Rots,et al.  Hafting Traces on Flint Tools: Possibilities and Limitations of Macro- and Microscopic Approaches , 2002 .

[23]  J. Kamminga.  Over the edge : functional analysis of Australian stone tools , 1982 .

[24]  Lawrence H. Keeley,et al.  Hafting and Retooling: Effects on the Archaeological Record , 1982, American Antiquity.