Investigation on Operational Envelops and Efficiency Maps of Electrically Excited Machines for Electrical Vehicle Applications

In this paper, the operational envelops and efficiency maps of an electrically excited (EE) machine with/without employing flux weakening control via armature current and/or with/without the field excitation regulating are obtained and comprehensively compared for electric vehicle applications. It shows that even in EE machines, only using the field excitation regulating but without the flux weakening armature current control, the maximum power at high speed is not constant but inversely proportional to the machine speed. Only by employing the flux weakening armature current control, the maximum constant power operation at high-speed region can be achieved while the operational high-speed region can be greatly extended. The maximum efficiency in this extended high-speed region can be achieved when both the field excitation and flux weakening d-axis armature current change proportionally. The main benefit of the field excitation regulating is that the efficiency in low-torque region can be significantly improved. All the analyses are validated analytically.

[1]  Mehrdad Ehsani,et al.  Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Architecture and Motor Drives , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  W. N. Fu,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of 1 MW High Speed Wound-Rotor Synchronous Machine , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[3]  Zhen Zhang,et al.  Design Principles of Permanent Magnet Dual-Memory Machines , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[4]  Olli Pyrhonen Analysis and Control of Excitation, Field Weakening and Stability in Direct Torque Controlled Electrically Excited Synchronous Motor Drives , 1998 .

[5]  Hans Bernhoff,et al.  Electrical Motor Drivelines in Commercial All-Electric Vehicles: A Review , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[6]  Lionel Vido,et al.  Hybrid Excitation Synchronous Machines: Energy-Efficient Solution for Vehicles Propulsion , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[7]  V. Ostovic,et al.  Memory motors , 2003 .

[8]  Chester Coomer,et al.  Evaluation of the 2010 Toyota Prius Hybrid Synergy Drive System , 2011 .

[9]  A. Belahcen,et al.  Importance of Iron-Loss Modeling in Simulation of Wound-Field Synchronous Machines , 2012, IEEE transactions on magnetics.

[10]  D. G. Dorrell,et al.  Are wound-rotor synchronous motors suitable for use in high efficiency torque-dense automotive drives? , 2012, IECON 2012 - 38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[11]  Jianning Dong,et al.  Analysis of a Novel Switched-Flux Memory Motor Employing a Time-Divisional Magnetization Strategy , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[12]  Zhiquan Deng,et al.  Comparison of Hybrid Excitation Topologies for Flux-Switching Machines , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[13]  K. Hameyer,et al.  Comparison and design of different electrical machine types regarding their applicability in hybrid electrical vehicles , 2008, 2008 18th International Conference on Electrical Machines.

[14]  S. Ogasawara,et al.  Torque Density and Efficiency Improvements of a Switched Reluctance Motor Without Rare-Earth Material for Hybrid Vehicles , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[15]  M L Bash,et al.  Modeling of Salient-Pole Wound-Rotor Synchronous Machines for Population-Based Design , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[16]  Fu Xinghe,et al.  Numerical Analysis on the Magnetic Field of Hybrid Exciting Synchronous Generator , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[17]  Ziqiang Zhu,et al.  A Novel Hybrid-Excited Switched-Flux Brushless AC Machine for EV/HEV Applications , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[18]  Heyun Lin,et al.  Permanent Magnet Remagnetizing Physics of a Variable Flux Memory Motor , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[19]  Z. Q. Zhu,et al.  Computationally efficient method and investigation of operational envelopes of hybrid and electrically excited machines , 2014, 2014 Ninth International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER).

[20]  Xiaoyong Zhu,et al.  A Transient Cosimulation Approach to Performance Analysis of Hybrid Excited Doubly Salient Machine Considering Indirect Field-Circuit Coupling , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[21]  D. Casadei,et al.  Wound Rotor Salient Pole Synchronous Machine Drive for Electric Traction , 2006, Conference Record of the 2006 IEEE Industry Applications Conference Forty-First IAS Annual Meeting.

[22]  N. Matsui,et al.  High Power Density Design of 6-Slot–8-Pole Hybrid Excitation Flux Switching Machine for Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[23]  Z. Q. Zhu,et al.  Simplified Analytical Optimization and Comparison of Torque Densities Between Electrically Excited and Permanent-Magnet Machines , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[24]  Mircea Popescu,et al.  A comparison of an interior permanent magnet and copper rotor induction motor in a hybrid electric vehicle application , 2013, 2013 International Electric Machines & Drives Conference.

[25]  G. Pellegrino,et al.  Comparison of Induction and PM Synchronous Motor Drives for EV Application Including Design Examples , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[26]  A. M. EL-Refaie,et al.  Motors/generators for traction /propulsion applications: A review , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC).

[27]  David G. Dorrell,et al.  Automotive Electric Propulsion Systems With Reduced or No Permanent Magnets: An Overview , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[28]  Akira Chiba,et al.  Comparison of the Test Result and 3D-FEM Analysis at the Knee Point of a 60 kW SRM for a HEV , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[29]  Longya Xu,et al.  Low-Cost Ferrite PM-Assisted Synchronous Reluctance Machine for Electric Vehicles , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[30]  David G. Dorrell,et al.  Comparison of different motor design drives for hybrid electric vehicles , 2010, 2010 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition.

[31]  M. Strauch,et al.  Calculation of the electromagnetic characteristics of an electrically excited synchronous motor for an EV , 2012, 2012 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[32]  David G. Dorrell,et al.  Analysis and Design Techniques Applied to Hybrid Vehicle Drive Machines—Assessment of Alternative IPM and Induction Motor Topologies , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[33]  Z. Zhu,et al.  Hybrid-Excited Flux-Switching Permanent-Magnet Machines With Iron Flux Bridges , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[34]  Z. Zhu,et al.  Electromagnetic Performance of Novel Variable Flux Reluctance Machines With DC-Field Coil in Stator , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[35]  Steve Pekarek,et al.  A comparison of permanent magnet and wound rotor synchronous machines for portable power generation , 2010, 2010 Power and Energy Conference At Illinois (PECI).