Dynamic Spectrum Sharing With Multiple Primary and Secondary Users

Dynamic spectrum sharing is a promising approach to alleviate the spectrum scarcity problem in wireless communications. Hence, it enhances the flexibility and, as a result, the efficiency of spectrum usage. In this paper, we address the problem of spectrum sharing in the secondary spectrum market involving multiple primary and secondary strategic users. In this scenario, primary users (PUs) are willing to offer part of their spectrum to secondary users (SUs) to earn extra revenue. For PUs, the more spectrum that is sold to SUs, the more revenue will be made from spectrum leasing. However, they will suffer quality-of-service (QoS) degradation for their primary service. SUs have their spectrum demands. They buy spectrum by taking into account the service satisfaction and cost in terms of payment. The profit of PUs and SUs is directly related to the bandwidth proportional allocation and price charging through a spectrum broker. PUs compete with each other to offer spectrum leasing, and SUs compete for spectrum sharing. We model this scenario as a noncooperative game and analyze it by exploring the properties of Nash equilibrium point. We discuss the two cases under complete and incomplete information assumptions. The simulation results demonstrate that our theoretic analysis is sound and accurate.

[1]  F. Jondral,et al.  Dynamic and local combined pricing, allocation and billing system with cognitive radios , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[2]  Roy D. Yates,et al.  Service provider competition and pricing for dynamic spectrum allocation , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Game Theory for Networks.

[3]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Algorithms, Games, and the Internet , 2001, ICALP.

[4]  Qian Zhang,et al.  Stackelberg game for utility-based cooperative cognitiveradio networks , 2009, MobiHoc '09.

[5]  Qian Zhang,et al.  Competitions and dynamics of duopoly wireless service providers in dynamic spectrum market , 2008, MobiHoc '08.

[6]  Umberto Spagnolini,et al.  Spectrum Leasing to Cooperating Secondary Ad Hoc Networks , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[7]  Zhu Han,et al.  Dynamics of Multiple-Seller and Multiple-Buyer Spectrum Trading in Cognitive Radio Networks: A Game-Theoretic Modeling Approach , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[8]  Dusit Niyato,et al.  Optimal Price Competition for Spectrum Sharing in Cognitive Radio: A Dynamic Game-Theoretic Approach , 2007, IEEE GLOBECOM 2007 - IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[9]  M. Chatterjee,et al.  An Economic Framework for Spectrum Allocation and Service Pricing with Competitive Wireless Service Providers , 2007, 2007 2nd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[10]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Efficiency loss in a network resource allocation game: the case of elastic supply , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[11]  Dusit Niyato,et al.  A Game-Theoretic Approach to Competitive Spectrum Sharing in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2007, 2007 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[12]  S. Shenker Fundamental Design Issues for the Future Internet , 1995 .

[13]  B. Hajek,et al.  Optimal allocation of a divisible good to strategic buyers , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[14]  Qian Zhang,et al.  Dynamic Spectrum Sharing With Multiple Primary and Secondary Users , 2011, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[15]  Xia Zhou,et al.  TRUST: A General Framework for Truthful Double Spectrum Auctions , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[16]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[17]  Shamik Sengupta,et al.  A Game Theoretic Framework for Distributed Self-Coexistence Among IEEE 802.22 Networks , 2008, IEEE GLOBECOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[18]  Baochun Li,et al.  A Secondary Market for Spectrum , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[19]  Pradeep Dubey,et al.  Inefficiency of Nash Equilibria , 1986, Math. Oper. Res..

[20]  Rajarathnam Chandramouli,et al.  Price dynamics in competitive agile spectrum access markets , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[21]  Rahim Tafazolli,et al.  Auction driven dynamic spectrum allocation: optimal bidding, pricing and service priorities for multi-rate, multi-class CDMA , 2005, 2005 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[22]  X. Vives,et al.  Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly , 1984 .