Analysis of Plasma Membrane Integrity by Fluorescent Detection of Tl+ Uptake

The exclusion of polar dyes by healthy cells is widely employed as a simple and reliable test for cell membrane integrity. However, commonly used dyes (propidium, Yo-Pro-1, trypan blue) cannot detect membrane defects which are smaller than the dye molecule itself, such as nanopores that form by exposure to ultrashort electric pulses (USEPs). Instead, here we demonstrate that opening of nanopores can be efficiently detected and studied by fluorescent measurement of Tl+ uptake. Various mammalian cells (CHO, GH3, NG108), loaded with a Tl+-sensitive fluorophore FluxOR™ and subjected to USEPs in a Tl+-containing bath buffer, displayed an immediate (within <100 ms), dose-dependent surge of fluorescence. In all tested cell lines, the threshold for membrane permeabilization to Tl+ by 600-ns USEP was at 1–2 kV/cm, and the rate of Tl+ uptake increased linearly with increasing the electric field. The lack of concurrent entry of larger dye molecules suggested that the size of nanopores is less than 1–1.5 nm. Tested ion channel inhibitors as well as removal of the extracellular Ca2+ did not block the USEP effect. Addition of a Tl+-containing buffer within less than 10 min after USEP also caused a fluorescence surge, which confirms the minutes-long lifetime of nanopores. Overall, the technique of fluorescent detection of Tl+ uptake proved highly effective, noninvasive and sensitive for visualization and analysis of membrane defects which are too small for conventional dye uptake detection methods.

[1]  D. Toomre,et al.  Repair of injured plasma membrane by rapid Ca2+-dependent endocytosis , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  N. Andrews,et al.  Two-way traffic on the road to plasma membrane repair. , 2008, Trends in cell biology.

[3]  Laura Marcu,et al.  Calcium bursts induced by nanosecond electric pulses. , 2003, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[4]  Kari A. Johnson,et al.  A Novel Assay of Gi/o-Linked G Protein-Coupled Receptor Coupling to Potassium Channels Provides New Insights into the Pharmacology of the Group III Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors , 2008, Molecular Pharmacology.

[5]  James C Weaver,et al.  Electrical behavior and pore accumulation in a multicellular model for conventional and supra-electroporation. , 2006, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[6]  E. Neumann,et al.  Electroporation and Electrofusion in Cell Biology , 1989, Springer US.

[7]  D. Deamer,et al.  Two mechanisms of permeation of small neutral molecules and hydrated ions across phospholipid bilayers , 1997 .

[8]  Damijan Miklavcic,et al.  Theoretical evaluation of voltage inducement on internal membranes of biological cells exposed to electric fields. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[9]  Juergen F Kolb,et al.  Membrane permeabilization and cell damage by ultrashort electric field shocks. , 2007, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[10]  G Saulis Kinetics of pore disappearance in a cell after electroporation. , 1999, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[11]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Bioelectrics-new applications for pulsed power technology , 2001, PPPS-2001 Pulsed Power Plasma Science 2001. 28th IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science and 13th IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference. Digest of Papers (Cat. No.01CH37251).

[12]  Michael R Murphy,et al.  Plasma membrane permeabilization by 60‐ and 600‐ns electric pulses is determined by the absorbed dose , 2009, Bioelectromagnetics.

[13]  A. Czarnecki,et al.  Potassium channel expression level is dependent on the proliferation state in the GH3 pituitary cell line. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[14]  N. Gamper,et al.  The use of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells in the study of ion channels. , 2005, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[15]  Juergen F Kolb,et al.  Selective field effects on intracellular vacuoles and vesicle membranes with nanosecond electric pulses. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[16]  M. Rols,et al.  Mechanisms of cell membrane electropermeabilization: a minireview of our present (lack of ?) knowledge. , 2005, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[17]  Laura Marcu,et al.  Nanoelectropulse-induced phosphatidylserine translocation. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[18]  L. Chernomordik,et al.  Reversible electrical breakdown of lipid bilayers: formation and evolution of pores. , 1988, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[19]  M. Rols,et al.  Direct visualization at the single-cell level of electrically mediated gene delivery , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  U. Zimmermann,et al.  Effect of medium conductivity and composition on the uptake of propidium iodide into electropermeabilized myeloma cells. , 1996, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[21]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Electroporation of cells and tissues , 2000 .

[22]  Sheng-Nan Wu,et al.  The mechanism of the actions of oxaliplatin on ion currents and action potentials in differentiated NG108-15 neuronal cells. , 2009, Neurotoxicology.

[23]  Juergen F Kolb,et al.  Regulation of intracellular calcium concentration by nanosecond pulsed electric fields. , 2009, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[24]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Diverse effects of nanosecond pulsed electric fields on cells and tissues. , 2003, DNA and cell biology.

[25]  Ruili Huang,et al.  A new homogeneous high-throughput screening assay for profiling compound activity on the human ether-a-go-go-related gene channel. , 2009, Analytical biochemistry.

[26]  Martin A Gundersen,et al.  Nanoelectropulse-driven membrane perturbation and small molecule permeabilization , 2006, BMC Cell Biology.

[27]  John H Ashmore,et al.  Characterization of the cytotoxic effect of high-intensity, 10-ns duration electrical pulses , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[28]  T. Creighton Proteins: Structures and Molecular Properties , 1986 .

[29]  James C Weaver,et al.  Active mechanisms are needed to describe cell responses to submicrosecond, megavolt-per-meter pulses: cell models for ultrashort pulses. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[30]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Intracellular effect of ultrashort electrical pulses , 2001, Bioelectromagnetics.

[31]  E. Tekle,et al.  Selective and asymmetric molecular transport across electroporated cell membranes. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  B. Hille Ionic channels of excitable membranes , 2001 .

[33]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Simulations of transient membrane behavior in cells subjected to a high-intensity ultrashort electric pulse. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[34]  Juergen F Kolb,et al.  Long‐lasting plasma membrane permeabilization in mammalian cells by nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) , 2007, Bioelectromagnetics.

[35]  Hana Zemkova,et al.  Biophysical basis of pituitary cell type-specific Ca2+ signaling–secretion coupling , 2005, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.

[36]  P. Gessner,et al.  Electromanipulation of mammalian cells: fundamentals and application , 2000 .

[37]  Bennett L Ibey,et al.  Lipid nanopores can form a stable, ion channel-like conduction pathway in cell membrane. , 2009, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[38]  K. Chandy,et al.  Voltage-dependent ion channels in T-lymphocytes , 1985, Journal of Neuroimmunology.

[39]  Shu Xiao,et al.  Bioelectric Effects of Intense Nanosecond Pulses , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[40]  G. Saulis,et al.  Kinetics of pore resealing in cell membranes after electroporation , 1991 .

[41]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Nanosecond, high‐intensity pulsed electric fields induce apoptosis in human cells , 2003, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[42]  S. Dworetzky,et al.  A Thallium-Sensitive, Fluorescence-Based Assay for Detecting and Characterizing Potassium Channel Modulators in Mammalian Cells , 2004, Journal of biomolecular screening.