Isomorphism and embedding problems for infinite limits of scale-free graphs

The study of random graphs has traditionally been dominated by the closely-related models <i>G</i>(<i>n, m</i>), in which a graph is sampled from the uniform distribution on graphs with <i>n</i> vertices and <i>m</i> edges, and <i>G</i>(<i>n, p</i>), in which each of the (<i>n</i>/2) edges is sampled independently with probability <i>p.</i> Recently, however, there has been considerable interest in alternate random graph models designed to more closely approximate the properties of complex real-world networks such as the Web graph, the Internet, and large social networks. Two of the most well-studied of these are the closely related "preferential attachment" and "copying" models, in which vertices arrive one-by-one in sequence and attach at random in "rich-get-richer" fashion to <i>d</i> earlier vertices.Here we study the infinite limits of the preferential attachment process --- namely, the asymptotic behavior of finite graphs produced by preferential attachment (brie y, <i>PA graphs</i>), as well as the infinite graphs obtained by continuing the process indefinitely. We are guided in part by a striking result of Erdö;s and Rényi on countable graphs produced by the infinite analogue of the <i>G</i>(<i>n, p</i>) model, showing that any two graphs produced by this model are isomorphic with probability 1; it is natural to ask whether a comparable result holds for the preferential attachment process.We find, somewhat surprisingly, that the answer depends critically on the out-degree <i>d</i> of the model. For <i>d</i> = 1 and <i>d</i> = 2, there exist infinite graphs <i>R</i><sup>∞</sup><inf><i>d</i></inf> such that a random graph generated according to the infinite preferential attachment process is isomorphic to <i>R</i><sup>∞</sup><inf><i>d</i></inf> with probability 1. For <i>d</i> ≥ 3, on the other hand, two different samples generated from the infinite preferential attachment process are non-isomorphic with positive probability. The main technical ingredients underlying this result have fundamental implications for the structure of finite PA graphs; in particular, we give a characterization of the graphs <i>H</i> for which the expected number of subgraph embeddings of <i>H</i> in an <i>n</i>-node PA graph remains bounded as <i>n</i> goes to infinity.

[1]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  The degree sequence of a scale‐free random graph process , 2001, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[2]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[3]  Eli Upfal,et al.  Stochastic models for the Web graph , 2000, Proceedings 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[4]  FaloutsosMichalis,et al.  On power-law relationships of the Internet topology , 1999 .

[5]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Trawling the Web for Emerging Cyber-Communities , 1999, Comput. Networks.

[6]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[7]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Mathematical results on scale‐free random graphs , 2005 .

[8]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  Randomized algorithms , 1996, CSUR.

[9]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Directed scale-free graphs , 2003, SODA '03.

[10]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  On power-law relationships of the Internet topology , 1999, SIGCOMM '99.

[11]  Fan Chung Graham,et al.  Random evolution in massive graphs , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing.

[12]  Russ Bubley,et al.  Randomized algorithms , 1995, CSUR.

[13]  Mark Newman,et al.  The structure and function of networks , 2002 .

[14]  SpencerJoel,et al.  The degree sequence of a scale-free random graph process , 2001 .

[15]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Extracting Large-Scale Knowledge Bases from the Web , 1999, VLDB.

[16]  B. Bollobás The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[17]  Amin Saberi,et al.  On certain connectivity properties of the Internet topology , 2003, 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings..

[18]  F. Chung,et al.  Eigenvalues of Random Power law Graphs , 2003 .

[19]  J. Spencer The Strange Logic of Random Graphs , 2001 .

[20]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The Web as a Graph: Measurements, Models, and Methods , 1999, COCOON.

[21]  Anthony Bonato,et al.  Infinite Limits of Copying Models of the Web Graph , 2004, Internet Math..

[22]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[23]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  On the Eigenvalue Power Law , 2002, RANDOM.

[24]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Robustness and Vulnerability of Scale-Free Random Graphs , 2004, Internet Math..

[25]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[26]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Random Graphs , 1985 .

[27]  Anthony Bonato,et al.  Limits and Power Laws of Models for the Web Graph and Other Networked Information Spaces , 2004, CAAN.

[28]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  A general model of web graphs , 2003, Random Struct. Algorithms.