Prediction of residual-stress depth profiles in turning of EN AW-2017 based on in-process measurements of machining forces and temperatures

The surface integrity of parts is strongly impacted by the surface-layer properties, which are modified by machining processes. In particular, it is advantageous if the finish machining process generates a resilient residual-stress state without additional post-treatment. Thus, this paper describes relationships between the forces and temperature which are measured in-situ/during the process and the residual-stress profile for the turning of the aluminum alloy EN AW-2017. The residual-stress depth profiles are measured by X-ray diffraction after electrochemical removal of material by means of jet-electrochemical machining. The characteristic features of the residual-stress profile (value and depth under the surface of the local minimum of the residual stress) are determined and modeled using multiple regression. The predictions of the models are validated by test samples. An excellent agreement between experiments and the model is achieved. Thus, the models can be applied to predict the expected residual-stress profiles during the machining process, which allows for an in-process adjustment of the machining parameters in order to generate an advantageous residual-stress state.

[1]  Sebastjan Žagar,et al.  Influence of Grinding on Residual Stress Measurements of Shot Peened Aluminium Alloy AA7075 , 2019, Strojniški vestnik – Journal of Mechanical Engineering.

[2]  Andreas Schubert,et al.  Micro machining with continuous electrolytic free jet , 2012 .

[3]  J. Grum,et al.  Surface Integrity after Mechanical Hardening of Various Aluminium Alloys , 2011 .

[4]  S. Anurag,et al.  Finite element modeling of residual stress profile patterns in hard turning , 2009, Powder Diffraction.

[5]  Berend Denkena,et al.  Machining induced residual stress in structural aluminum parts , 2008, Prod. Eng..

[6]  Steven Y. Liang,et al.  Modeling of Residual Stress Profile in Finish Hard Turning , 2006 .

[7]  Fukuo Hashimoto,et al.  Effect of feed rate, workpiece hardness and cutting edge on subsurface residual stress in the hard turning of bearing steel using chamfer + hone cutting edge geometry , 2005 .

[8]  C. García-Rosales,et al.  Residual stresses in tool steel due to hard‐turning , 2003 .

[9]  Richard E. DeVor,et al.  Predictive model for the full biaxial surface and subsurface residual stress profiles from turning , 2001 .

[10]  Eckard Macherauch,et al.  Röntgenographische Untersuchung von Spannungszuständen in Werkstoffen. Teil III. Fortsetzung von Matwiss. und Werkstofftechn. Heft 3/1995, S. 148–160 und Heft 4/1995, S. 199–216 , 1996 .

[11]  Eckard Macherauch,et al.  Röntgenographische Untersuchung von Spannungszuständen in Werkstoffen , 1995 .

[12]  A. Schubert,et al.  Application Potential of Thermoelectric Signals for Temperature Monitoring in Turning of Aluminum Alloys , 2020 .

[13]  T. Mehner,et al.  Measurement system based on the Seebeck effect for the determination of temperature and tool wear during turning of aluminum alloys , 2020 .

[14]  S. Liang,et al.  Residual stress prediction for turning of Ti-6Al-4V considering the microstructure evolution , 2019 .

[15]  S. Žagar ROUGHNESS , RESIDUAL STRESSES AND PITTING CORROSION EFFECT ON SHOT PEENED AA 7075 , 2015 .

[16]  D. Ulutana,et al.  Empirical modeling of residual stress profile in machining nickel-based superalloys using the sinusoidal decay function , 2014 .