Just Enough or All: Selling a Firm †

We consider the problem of selling a firm to a single buyer. The magnitude of the post-sale cash flow rights (v) as well as the benefits of control (b) are the buyer’s private information. In contrast to research that assumes the private information of the buyer is one-dimensional, the optimal mechanism is a menu of tuples of cashequity mixtures. We provide sufficient conditions on the joint distribution of v and b such that the optimal mechanism takes one of the following forms: i) a take-it or leave-it offer for the smallest fraction of the company that facilitates the transfer of control, or ii) a take-it or leave-it offer for all the shares of the company. We also identify a sufficient condition for the seller to extract the full value, v, per share so that the buyer earns information rents only on the private benefits of control. JEL Code: D82, D86. Keywords: Multidimensional mechanism design, negotiated block trades, private benefits, privatization, takeovers, bilateral trade, asymmetric information, cashequity offers.

[1]  R. McAfee,et al.  Multidimensional incentive compatibility and mechanism design , 1988 .

[2]  Michael J. Fishman Preemptive Bidding and the Role of the Medium of Exchange in Acquisitions , 1989 .

[3]  R. Deneckere,et al.  A Method to Solve a Class of Two-Dimensional Screening Problems. , 2005 .

[4]  Yeon-Koo Che,et al.  The Optimal Mechanism for Selling to a Budget-Constrained Buyer , 2000, J. Econ. Theory.

[5]  R. Hansen,et al.  A Theory for the Choice of Exchange Medium in Mergers and Acquisitions , 1987 .

[6]  J. H. Mulherin,et al.  How are Firms Sold? , 2006 .

[7]  J. Rochet A necessary and sufficient condition for rationalizability in a quasi-linear context , 1987 .

[8]  R. Deb,et al.  Implementation with Securities , 2013 .

[9]  C. Holderness Myth of Diffuse Ownership in the United States , 2009 .

[10]  B. Eckbo,et al.  Corporate Takeovers , 2008 .

[11]  Beni Lauterbach,et al.  Estimating the private benefits of control from partial control transfers: methodology and evidence , 2011 .

[12]  J. Rochet,et al.  The Economics of Multidimensional Screening , 2003 .

[13]  Samuel David Lee,et al.  Signaling in Tender Offer Games , 2010 .

[14]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[15]  Francesca Cornelli,et al.  Large Shareholders, Private Benefits of Control, and Optimal Schemes of Privatization , 1993 .

[16]  A. Malenko,et al.  Competition among Sellers in Securities Auctions , 2010 .

[17]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .

[18]  N. Travlos,et al.  Corporate Takeover Bids, Methods of Payment, and Bidding Firms' Stock Returns , 1987 .

[19]  Robert S. Harris,et al.  Means of Payment in Takeovers: Results for the United Kingdom and the United States , 1988 .

[20]  Yeon-Koo Che,et al.  Bidding with Securities: Comment , 2010 .

[21]  P. DeMarzo,et al.  Bidding with Securities: Auctions and Security Design , 2004 .

[22]  Lucian Arye Bebchuk,et al.  Efficient and Inefficient Sales of Corporate Control , 1994 .

[23]  Bilge Yilmaz,et al.  INFORMATION AND EFFICIENCY IN TENDER OFFERS , 2008 .

[24]  Bilge Yilmaz,et al.  Takeover Bidding and Shareholder Information , 2005 .

[25]  William F. Samuelson Auctions with Contingent Payments: Comment , 1987 .

[26]  Samuel Lee,et al.  Signalling to Dispersed Shareholders and Corporate Control , 2015 .

[27]  Andrzej Skrzypacz Auctions with contingent payments — An overview , 2013 .

[28]  Jeffrey C. Ely,et al.  Mechanism design without revenue equivalence , 2013, J. Econ. Theory.

[29]  Francesca Cornelli,et al.  How to Sell a (Bankrupt) Company? , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[30]  Clifford G. Holderness,et al.  Private benefits from control of public corporations , 1989 .

[31]  Sanford J. Grossman,et al.  The free-rider problem and the theory of the corporation , 1980 .

[32]  J. Rochet Monopoly regulation without the Spence–Mirrlees assumption ☆ , 2009 .

[33]  R. Hansen Auctions with Contingent Payments , 1985 .

[34]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[35]  Yeon-Koo Che,et al.  Bidding with Securities , 2009 .

[36]  D. Sappington,et al.  Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Demand and Cost Functions , 1988 .

[37]  R. Deb,et al.  Implementation With Contingent Contracts , 2014 .

[38]  Information in Tender Offers With a Large Shareholder , 2016 .

[39]  David M. Rahman Detecting Profitable Deviations , 2010 .

[40]  Shorey Peterson,et al.  The Modern Corporation and Private Property. , 1933 .

[41]  Tymofiy Mylovanov,et al.  Mechanism Design by an Informed Principal: Private Values with Transferable Utility , 2014 .

[42]  Jerold B. Warner,et al.  On corporate governance: A study of proxy contests , 1983 .

[43]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  Government Ownership of Banks , 2000 .

[44]  Rakesh V. Vohra,et al.  Optimal auctions with financially constrained buyers , 2008, J. Econ. Theory.

[45]  M. P. Narayanan,et al.  Competition and the Medium of Exchange in Takeovers , 1990 .

[46]  Luigi Zingales Insider Ownership and the Decision to Go Public , 1995 .

[47]  C. Mezzetti Mechanism Design with Interdependent Valuations: Efficiency , 2004 .

[48]  R. Radner,et al.  Optimal Nonlinear Pricing with Two-Dimensional Characteristics , 1987 .

[49]  B. Eckbo,et al.  Asymmetric Information and the Medium of Exchange in Takeovers: Theory and Tests , 1990 .

[50]  Value of Information and Fairness Opinions in Takeovers , 2014 .

[51]  Alejandro M. Manelli,et al.  Multidimensional Mechanism Design: Revenue Maximization and the Multiple-Good Monopoly , 2004, J. Econ. Theory.

[52]  Barton L. Lipman,et al.  Successful Takeovers without Exclusion , 1988 .

[53]  M. Amestrong Multiproduct Nonlinear Pricing , 1993 .

[54]  Matthias Messner,et al.  Extremal Incentive Compatible Transfers , 2008 .