Effects of the guide field on electron distribution functions in the diffusion region of asymmetric reconnection

Crescent electron distribution functions in the electron diffusion region in asymmetric reconnection with a guide field (strength less than 50% of the upstream magnetic field) are investigated by theory and fully kinetic simulations. Electron motion in the electron diffusion region is a combination of meandering across the current sheet and gyration around the guide field. Combining the two canonical momentum conservation laws in a one-dimensional model with the energy conservation law, we derive the shape of crescent electron distribution functions in both velocity planes: perpendicular to the magnetic field and coplanner with the magnetic field. There are two major effects of the guide field on crescent distribution functions: (1) widening the opening angle of the crescent in a reduced distribution function and (2) the linear cut-off of a distribution function nonparallel to the magnetic field. We also discuss a translational mapping (perpendicular to the linear cut-off) of distribution functions between the X-line and another position. In addition, considering the gyration due to the normal magnetic field, we predict the shape of distribution functions in general positions in the electron diffusion region. The predictions will be useful to identify features of magnetic reconnection in a guide field by satellite observations.Crescent electron distribution functions in the electron diffusion region in asymmetric reconnection with a guide field (strength less than 50% of the upstream magnetic field) are investigated by theory and fully kinetic simulations. Electron motion in the electron diffusion region is a combination of meandering across the current sheet and gyration around the guide field. Combining the two canonical momentum conservation laws in a one-dimensional model with the energy conservation law, we derive the shape of crescent electron distribution functions in both velocity planes: perpendicular to the magnetic field and coplanner with the magnetic field. There are two major effects of the guide field on crescent distribution functions: (1) widening the opening angle of the crescent in a reduced distribution function and (2) the linear cut-off of a distribution function nonparallel to the magnetic field. We also discuss a translational mapping (perpendicular to the linear cut-off) of distribution functions betwee...

[1]  C. Russell,et al.  How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate E M for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017? , 2018, Journal of geophysical research. Space physics.

[2]  P. Lindqvist,et al.  Electron Dynamics Within the Electron Diffusion Region of Asymmetric Reconnection , 2018 .

[3]  C. Russell,et al.  Electron Crescent Distributions as a Manifestation of Diamagnetic Drift in an Electron‐Scale Current Sheet: Magnetospheric Multiscale Observations Using New 7.5 ms Fast Plasma Investigation Moments , 2017, Geophysical Research Letters.

[4]  C. Russell,et al.  MMS Observation of Asymmetric Reconnection Supported by 3‐D Electron Pressure Divergence , 2017, 1711.08262.

[5]  B. Anderson,et al.  The Effect of a Guide Field on Local Energy Conversion During Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection: Particle‐in‐Cell Simulations , 2017 .

[6]  M. Hesse,et al.  The effect of reconnection electric field on crescent and U-shaped distribution functions in asymmetric reconnection with no guide field , 2017 .

[7]  C. Russell,et al.  The Effect of a Guide Field on Local Energy Conversion During Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection: MMS Observations , 2017, 1706.08404.

[8]  P. Lindqvist,et al.  Electron diffusion region during magnetopause reconnection with an intermediate guide field: Magnetospheric multiscale observations , 2017 .

[9]  M. Hesse,et al.  Population Mixing in Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection with a Guide Field. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[10]  T. Nagai,et al.  Electron dynamics surrounding the X line in asymmetric magnetic reconnection , 2017, 1702.07244.

[11]  G. Lapenta,et al.  On the origin of the crescent‐shaped distributions observed by MMS at the magnetopause , 2017, 1702.03550.

[12]  J. Burch,et al.  Magnetic reconnection at the dayside magnetopause: Advances with MMS , 2016 .

[13]  P. Cassak,et al.  Spacecraft Observations and Analytic Theory of Crescent-Shaped Electron Distributions in Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[14]  C. Norgren,et al.  Finite gyroradius effects in the electron outflow of asymmetric magnetic reconnection , 2016 .

[15]  C. Russell,et al.  Electron energization and mixing observed by MMS in the vicinity of an electron diffusion region during magnetopause reconnection , 2016 .

[16]  John C. Dorelli,et al.  MMS observations of electron‐scale filamentary currents in the reconnection exhaust and near the X line , 2016 .

[17]  J. Birn,et al.  On the electron diffusion region in asymmetric reconnection with a guide magnetic field , 2016 .

[18]  M. Hesse,et al.  Electron energization and structure of the diffusion region during asymmetric reconnection , 2016 .

[19]  J. B. Blake,et al.  Electron-scale measurements of magnetic reconnection in space , 2016, Science.

[20]  N. Bessho,et al.  Electron distribution functions in the diffusion region of asymmetric magnetic reconnection , 2016 .

[21]  M. Fujimoto,et al.  Kinetic signatures of the region surrounding the X line in asymmetric (magnetopause) reconnection , 2016, 1602.00779.

[22]  David G. Sibeck,et al.  On the electron diffusion region in planar, asymmetric, systems , 2014 .

[23]  J. Birn,et al.  Aspects of Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection in Asymmetric Systems , 2013 .

[24]  B. Sonnerup,et al.  Minimum and Maximum Variance Analysis , 1998 .