It is not What but Who you Know: A Time-Sensitive Collaboration Impact Measure of Researchers in Surrounding Communities

In the last decades, many measures and metrics have been proposed with the goal of automatically providing quantitative rather than qualitative indications over researchers' academic productions. However, when evaluating a researcher, most of the commonly-applied measures do not consider one of the key aspect of every research work: the collaborations among researchers and, more specifically, the impact that each co-author has on the scientific production of another. In fact, in an evaluation process, some co-authored works can unconditionally favor researchers working in competitive research environments surrounded by experts able to lead high-quality research projects, where state-of-the-art measures usually fail in trying to distinguish co-authors from their pure publication history. In the light of this, instead of focusing on a pure quantitative/qualitative evaluation of curricula, we propose a novel temporal model for formalizing and estimating the dependence of a researcher on individual collaborations, over time, in surrounding communities. We then implemented and evaluated our model with a set of experiments on real case scenarios and through an extensive user study.

[1]  R. Slone Coauthors' contributions to major papers published in the AJR: frequency of undeserved coauthorship. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  Juan Imperial,et al.  Usefulness of Hirsch’s h-index to evaluate scientific research in Spain , 2007, Scientometrics.

[3]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  To share the fame in a fair way, hm modifies h for multi-authored manuscripts , 2008 .

[4]  Marko A. Rodriguez,et al.  An in-depth longitudinal analysis of mixing patterns in a small scientific collaboration network , 2009, ArXiv.

[6]  C. Dancey,et al.  Statistics Without Maths For Psychology , 1999 .

[7]  J. Hirsch Does the h index have predictive power? , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Yannis Manolopoulos,et al.  Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks , 2007, Scientometrics.

[9]  Camille Roth,et al.  Academic team formation as evolving hypergraphs , 2010, Scientometrics.

[10]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[11]  Ying Ding,et al.  Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Luigi Di Caro,et al.  D-INDEX: a web environment for analyzing dependences among scientific collaborators , 2012, KDD.

[13]  Ulf Sandström,et al.  The independence indicators: bibliometrics at the individual level , 2012 .

[14]  Marko A. Rodriguez,et al.  On the relationship between the structural and socioacademic communities of a coauthorship network , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[15]  M. Kendall A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION , 1938 .

[16]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Rand Wilcox,et al.  Chapter 10 – Robust Regression , 2012 .

[18]  R. Wilcox Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing , 1997 .

[19]  Marcel Ausloos,et al.  A scientometrics law about co-authors and their ranking: the co-author core , 2012, Scientometrics.

[20]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Trying an authorship index , 1991, Nature.

[21]  Luigi Di Caro,et al.  The d-index: Discovering dependences among scientific collaborators from their bibliographic data records , 2012, Scientometrics.

[22]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Christine P. Dancey,et al.  Statistics Without Maths for Psychology: Using Spss for Windows , 2005 .