Compensating Nondedicated Cross-Functional Teams

In today's ever-changing, competitive business environment, nondedicated cross-functional teams have become an important organizational work unit. This paper studies how the firm should optimally compensate such teams. Most previous studies on team compensation deal with dedicated work groups, where team members essentially allocate all their time and effort to team work. Little research has addressed issues related to compensating nondedicated teams, where team members perform tasks assigned by their home departments while also completing team work. In this paper, we provide analytical models to describe the unique decision-making processes engaged both by the firm and by such nondedicated team members. Our game-theoretic approach incorporates interdependency among team members into cross-functional team yield functions and takes into account the social benefits generated from team interactions for both firms and individual employees. The models also consider the technical and social skill differences among team members. Our results not only generate managerial insights on how firms should compensate nondedicated team members, but also build the foundation for future empirical studies.

[1]  P. Douglas,et al.  A theory of production , 1928 .

[2]  John U. Farley,et al.  An Optimal Plan for Salesmen’s Compensation , 1964 .

[3]  H. Demsetz,et al.  Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization , 1975, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[4]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[5]  Milton E. Rosenbaum,et al.  Group Productivity and Process: Pure and Mixed Reward Structures and Task Interdependence. , 1980 .

[6]  V. Srinivasan,et al.  An Investigation of the Equal Commission Rate Policy for a Multi-Product Salesforce , 1981 .

[7]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard in Teams , 1982 .

[8]  E. Fama,et al.  Agency Problems and Residual Claims , 1983 .

[9]  F. Dwyer,et al.  Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships: , 1987 .

[10]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  An Economic Approach to Influence Activities in Organizations , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model. , 1988 .

[12]  K. Eisenhardt Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[13]  J. M. Digman PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[14]  Gary Coombs,et al.  Cross-Functional Pay Strategies in High-Technology Firms , 1991 .

[15]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  POTENTIAL POWER AND POWER USE: AN INVESTIGATION OF STRUCTURE AND BEHAVIOR , 1993 .

[16]  J. Barker Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams , 1993 .

[17]  R. Putnam The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life , 1993 .

[18]  Elizabeth J. Hawk,et al.  Realizing the Potential of Teams Through Team-Based Rewards , 1994 .

[19]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing , 1994 .

[20]  R. Wageman Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[21]  R. Frank,et al.  The Winner-Take-All Society , 1995 .

[22]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Incentives and Computing Systems for Team-Based Organizations , 1995 .

[23]  R. Putnam Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[24]  Craig Eric Schneier,et al.  Team Measurement and Rewards: How Some Companies Are Getting It Right , 1995 .

[25]  Sönke Albers,et al.  Optimization models for salesforce compensation , 1996 .

[26]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  The Determinants of Incentive Intensity in Group-Based Rewards , 1996 .

[27]  Tim Rowley Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[28]  D. Hansen,et al.  Worker Performance and Group Incentives: A Case Study , 1997 .

[29]  George P. Baker,et al.  Incentives and cooperation: the joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance , 1997 .

[30]  R. Burt The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[31]  Cheryl Zobal The “ideal” team compensation system ‐ an overview: Part I , 1998 .

[32]  Carrie R. Leana,et al.  Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices , 1999 .

[33]  M. Bloom,et al.  The Performance Effects of Pay Dispersion on Individuals and Organizations , 1999 .

[34]  D. Runkle,et al.  An experimental study of information and mixed-strategy play in the three-person matching-pennies game , 2000 .

[35]  G R Ferris,et al.  Interaction of social skill and general mental ability on job performance and salary. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[36]  L. McClurg Team Rewards: How Far Have We Come? , 2001 .

[37]  V. Druskat,et al.  Building the emotional intelligence of groups. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[38]  V. Mahajan,et al.  The Effect of Reward Structures on the Performance of Cross-Functional Product Development Teams , 2001 .

[39]  Marie Claire Villeval,et al.  Does Team-Based Compensation Give Rise to Problems When Agents Vary in Their Ability? , 2001 .

[40]  Patricia Pitcher,et al.  Top Management Team Heterogeneity: Personality, Power, and Proxies , 2001 .

[41]  Rafael Rob,et al.  Social Capital, Corporate Culture, and Incentive Intensity , 2002 .

[42]  Lambros Pechlivanos,et al.  Career Concerns in Teams , 2002, Journal of Labor Economics.

[43]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  Cooperation, Competition, and Team Performance: Toward a Contingency Approach , 2003 .