Bmc Musculoskeletal Disorders Reliability of Upright Posture Measurements in Primary School Children

BackgroundCorrect upright posture is considered to be a measure of good musculoskeletal health. Little is known about the usual variability of children's upright standing posture. The aim of this study was to assess differences between repeated measures of upright posture in a group of primary school children.MethodsSagittal plane photographs of usual, relaxed upright standing posture of 38 boys and girls aged 5–12 years were taken twice within an hour. Reflective markers were placed over the canthus, tragus, C7 spinous process, greater trochanter and lateral malleolus. Digitising software was used to calculate the x,y plane coordinates, from which five postural angles were calculated (trunk, neck, gaze, head on neck, lower limb). Height, weight, motor control estimates (as measured by the Brace Tests) and presence of recent pain were recorded for each child, and the association between the first test measure of posture angles and these factors was assessed using linear regression and ANOVA models. Multiple ANOVA models were applied to analyse the effect of repeated testing, and significant predictors on the angles.ResultsFour of the five postural angles (trunk, neck, head on neck, lower limb) were significantly influenced by age. As age was strongly associated with height (r2 = 0.84) and moderately associated with weight and motor control (r2 = 0.67, 0.56 respectively), these developmental parameters may well explain the age effect on angles. There was no relationship between age and pain reported on either the testing day, or recently, and there was no gender influence on any angle. There was no significant effect of repeated testing on any angle (ICC>0.93). None of the hypothesized predictors were associated with differences in angles from repeated testing.ConclusionThis study outlined the variability of relaxed upright standing posture of children aged 5–12 years, when measured twice in an hour. Age influenced the size of the angles but not the variability. While the subject numbers in this study are small, the findings provide useful information on which further studies in posture and its development in pre-adolescent children can be based.

[1]  D. K. Brace Measuring motor ability : a scale of motor ability tests , 1927 .

[2]  Body Mechanics Analysis of Yale University Freshmen , 1937 .

[3]  G. Grieve Common Vertebral Joint Problems , 1981 .

[4]  H. Forssberg,et al.  Ontogenetic development of postural control in man: adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Woollacott,et al.  The growth of stability: postural control from a development perspective. , 1985, Journal of motor behavior.

[6]  E. Hershman,et al.  The Lower extremity and spine in sports medicine , 1986 .

[7]  M. Hoffer,et al.  The Lower Extremity and Spine in Sports Medicine , 1987 .

[8]  E. Wojtys Sports injuries in the immature athlete. , 1987, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[9]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Development of Posture and Gait: Across the Life Span , 1989 .

[10]  O. Bar-or,et al.  Growth, Maturation and Physical Activity , 1992 .

[11]  B. Dawson-Saunders,et al.  Basic and Clinical Biostatistics , 1993 .

[12]  L. Twomey,et al.  Physical Therapy of the Low Back , 1994 .

[13]  Ruth Grant Physical therapy of the cervical and thoracic spine , 1994 .

[14]  F. P. Kendall,et al.  Muscles, testing and function , 1971 .

[15]  Marjorie H. Woollacott,et al.  Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications , 1995 .

[16]  Nagao Usui,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF THE UPRIGHT POSTURAL SWAY OF CHILDREN , 1995, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[17]  L Straker,et al.  A comparison of the postures assumed when using laptop computers and desktop computers. , 1997, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  S. Gandevia,et al.  Perceptual distortions of the human body image produced by local anaesthesia, pain and cutaneous stimulation , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  D. Anthony Understanding advanced statistics : a guide for nurses and health care researchers , 1999 .

[20]  K. Grimmer,et al.  The associations between adolescent head-on-neck posture, backpack weight, and anthropometric features. , 1999, Spine.

[21]  C. MacDonncha,et al.  A reliable technique for the assessment of posture: assessment criteria for aspects of posture. , 2000, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[22]  L. Straker,et al.  An evaluation of visual display unit placement by electromyography, posture, discomfort and preference , 2000 .

[23]  P. Trott Chapter 14 – Management of Selected Cervical Syndromes , 2002 .

[24]  Ubon Pirunsan,et al.  BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders BioMed Central BMC 32002, Musculoskeletal , 2001 .

[25]  Karen Grimmer,et al.  The postural effects of load carriage on young people – a systematic review , 2003, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[26]  M. White Growth, Maturation and Physical Activity, 2nd Edition , 2004 .

[27]  K. Janz Growth, maturation, and physical activity, 2nd edition , 2004 .