The sustainability of telework: an ecological-footprinting approach

Abstract This paper demonstrates the importance of a comprehensive framework to assess how telework affects sustainability. Sustainability-policy evaluation rarely considers substitution effects despite broad recognition that overall lifestyles must be analyzed to gauge how policy-induced behavioral changes translate into net environmental impact. Casestudy data indicate that telework has far-reaching, complex, and varied effects on lifestyle practices, with potentially important environmental implications. Because adjustments occur across numerous consumption categories, the assessment of telework’s environmental dimensions must move beyond single-issue studies and single-dataset analysis. Ecological-footprint analysis, in combination with qualitative data, can suggest solutions to sustainability problems.

[1]  Colin Hunter,et al.  Sustainable Tourism and the Touristic Ecological Footprint , 2002 .

[2]  Hadi Dowlatabadi,et al.  The ecological footprint: a non-monetary metric of human consumption applied to North America , 2003 .

[3]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  Telecommuting, Residential Location, and Commute-Distance Traveled: Evidence from State of California Employees , 2003 .

[4]  Erling Holden,et al.  Ecological footprints and sustainable urban form , 2004 .

[5]  L. Haddon,et al.  The Character of Telework and the Characteristics of Teleworkers , 2005 .

[6]  Kiran Mirchandani,et al.  “The Best of Both Worlds” and “Cutting My Own Throat”: Contradictory Images of Home-Based Work , 2000 .

[7]  Craig Simmons,et al.  Footprinting UK households: How big is your ecological garden? , 1998 .

[8]  Margaret Tan,et al.  The virtual workplace , 1998 .

[9]  Jin-Ru Yen,et al.  Interpreting employee telecommuting adoption: An economics perspective , 2000 .

[10]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Sharing Nature's Interest: Ecological Footprints as an Indicator of Sustainability , 2000 .

[11]  Ilan Salomon,et al.  Measuring the Measurable: Why can’t we Agree on the Number of Telecommuters in the U.S.? , 2005 .

[12]  John Barrett,et al.  Component ecological footprint: developing sustainable scenarios , 2001 .

[13]  Pekka Lahti,et al.  Sustainable, competitive or good cities : bake a cake or make a fake? , 2002 .

[14]  J. Andrey,et al.  Does Design Matter? The Ecological Footprint as a Planning Tool at the Local Level , 2006 .

[15]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  An Application of a Modified Ecological Footprint Method and Structural Path Analysis in a Comparative Institutional Study , 2003 .

[16]  Graham Wood,et al.  Modelling the Ecological Footprint of Green Travel Plans Using GIS and Network Analysis: From Metaphor to Management Tool? , 2003 .

[17]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  The ecological footprint of Santiago de Chile , 1998 .

[18]  Stephen R. Porter,et al.  The Impact of Contact Type on Web Survey Response Rates , 2003 .

[19]  Russel L. Thompson,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys , 2000 .

[20]  Andrew J. DuBrin,et al.  Comparison of the Job Satisfaction and Productivity of Telecommuters versus in-House Employees: A Research Note on Work in Progress , 1991 .

[21]  Donald A. Anderson,et al.  Impact of telecommuting and intelligent transportation systems on residential location choice , 2003 .

[22]  D. McKenzie‐Mohr,et al.  Fostering Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing , 1999 .

[23]  J. Andrey,et al.  Mr. Dithers Comes to Dinner: Telework and the merging of women's work and home domains in Canada , 2007 .

[24]  Laura C. Johnson.  The Co-Workplace: Teleworking in the Neighbourhood , 2002 .

[25]  J. Bergh,et al.  Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’ , 1999 .

[26]  Erwin H. Bulte,et al.  The ecological footprint: useful science or politics? , 2000 .

[27]  J. Andrey,et al.  The Struggle for Life Balance: Work, Family, and Leisure in the Lives of Women Teleworkers , 2003 .

[28]  Gene Bazan.  Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth , 1997 .

[29]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Energy-related emissions from telework. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[30]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[31]  Andrew K. Jorgenson.  Consumption and Environmental Degradation: A Cross-National Analysis of the Ecological Footprint , 2003 .

[32]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  Worker Telecommunication and Mobility in Transition: Consequences for Planning , 2001 .

[33]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  A review of the empirical research on telecommuting and directions for future research , 1998 .

[34]  R. Allen.  World conservation strategy. Living resource conservation for sustainable development. , 1980 .

[35]  Itzhak Harpaz,et al.  Advantages and disadvantages of telecommuting for the individual, organization and society , 2002 .

[36]  S. Gössling,et al.  Ecological footprint analysis as a tool to assess tourism sustainability , 2002 .

[37]  I. Audirac,et al.  Information Technology (IT) and Urban Form: An Annotated Bibliography of the Urban Deconcentration and Economic Restructuring Literatures , 2003 .

[38]  Michele Blazek,et al.  Measurement of environmental impacts of telework adoption amidst change in complex organizations: AT&T survey methodology and results , 2002 .

[39]  Maurie J. Cohen,et al.  The new politics of consumption: promoting sustainability in the American marketplace , 2005 .

[40]  S J Hepworth,et al.  Recall of past use of mobile phone handsets. , 2003, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[41]  Geoffrey J. D. Hewings,et al.  Information technology and urban spatial structure: A comparative analysis of the Chicago and Seoul regions , 2003 .

[42]  L. Hamilton.  Self-Reported and Actual Savings in a Water Conservation Campaign , 1985 .

[43]  Gert Spaargaren,et al.  The politics of sustainable consumption: the case of the Netherlands , 2005 .

[44]  A. Skaburskis.  New Urbanism and Sprawl , 2006 .

[45]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  Does telecommuting reduce vehicle-miles traveled? An aggregate time series analysis for the U.S. , 2005 .

[46]  John Holmberg,et al.  The ecological footprint from a systems perspective of sustainability , 1999 .

[47]  J. Randers,et al.  Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Nancy B. Kurland,et al.  A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work , 2002 .

[49]  Samy Sanches.  Sustainable consumption à la française? Conventional, innovative, and alternative approaches to sustainability and consumption in France , 2005 .

[50]  Private benefits and public costs: Policies to address suburban sprawl , 1999 .

[51]  A. Duany,et al.  Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream , 2000 .

[52]  Sean T. Doherty,et al.  Toward Sustainable Transportation: Exploring Transportation Decision Making in Teleworking Households in a Mid-Sized Canadian City , 2004 .