Articulating a New Framework for Visual Metaphors in Advertising

This study develops and tests a conceptual framework for categorizing visual metaphors in advertising according to whether the pictorial elements in the ad are synthesized or juxtaposed. In this attempt, it subscribes to the view that creative ideas frequently share similar design structures and patterns in devising visual metaphors. This study demonstrates that compared with ad visuals that simply juxtapose metaphorical objects, ad visuals that synthesize conceptually similar metaphorical objects provoke greater elaboration and elicit more favorable consumer attitudes toward both the ad and the brand. These positive effects are not free of comprehension costs, however. Ads that synthesize very dissimilar objects (as compared with ads that juxtapose objects) fail to produce the same benefits and might, in some cases, even risk reducing the persuasiveness of the argument about key product attributes in the advertising message.

[1]  Yih Hwai Lee Manipulating Ad Message Involvement through Information Expectancy: Effects on Attitude Evaluation and Confidence , 2000 .

[2]  Linda L. Price,et al.  The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions , 1987 .

[3]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation , 1989 .

[4]  R. C. Goodstein Category-based Applications and Extensions in Advertising: Motivating More Extensive Ad Processing , 1993 .

[5]  Barbara J. Phillips,et al.  Impact of Advertising Metaphor on Consumer Belief: Delineating the Contribution of Comparison Versus Deviation Factors , 2009 .

[6]  M. Black More about metaphor , 1977 .

[7]  Allyssa McCabe,et al.  Conceptual similarity and the quality of metaphor in isolated sentences versus extended contexts , 1983 .

[8]  Alfons Maes,et al.  Classifying visual rhetoric. Conceptual and structural heuristics. , 2007 .

[9]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language , 1996 .

[10]  Alan F. Blackwell,et al.  Visual Metaphor , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[11]  N. Mackworth,et al.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Swee Hoon Ang,et al.  Exploring the dimensions of ad creativity , 2000 .

[13]  N. Teng,et al.  Grouping, Simile, and Oxymoron in Pictures: A Design-Based Cognitive Approach , 2002 .

[14]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  Beyond Visual Metaphor: A New Typology of Visual Rhetoric in Advertising , 2004 .

[15]  Laura A. Peracchio,et al.  How Ambiguous Cropped Objects in Ad Photos Can Affect Product Evaluations , 1994 .

[16]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Picture-Word Consistency and the Elaborative Processing of Advertisements: , 1987 .

[17]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  Visual and Verbal Rhetorical Figures Under Directed Processing Versus Incidental Exposure to Advertising , 2003 .

[18]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  INDIRECT PERSUASION IN ADVERTISING , 2005 .

[19]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  A Propulsion Model of Types of Creative Contributions , 1999 .

[20]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  When Deep Structures Surface: Design Structures That Can Repeatedly Surprise , 2008 .

[21]  Bruce A. Huhmann,et al.  Combinatory and Separative Effects of Rhetorical Figures on Consumers' Effort and Focus in Ad Processing , 2002 .

[22]  Nancy Spears On the Use of Time Expressions in Promoting Product Benefits--The Metaphoric and the Literal , 2003 .

[23]  S. Kaplan Visual metaphors in the representation of communication technology , 1990 .

[24]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Picture-Word Consistency and the Elaborative Processing of Advertisements , 1987 .

[25]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: Text-Interpretive, Experimental, and Reader-Response Analyses , 1999 .

[26]  L. Peracchio,et al.  Points of View and Pieces of Time: A Taxonomy of Image Attributes , 2004 .

[27]  G. Goodman Picture memory: How the action schema affects retention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  L. Lagerwerf,et al.  Openness in Metaphorical and Straightforward Advertisements: Appreciation Effects , 2008 .

[29]  Barbara J. Phillips The Impact of Verbal Anchoring on Consumer Response to Image Ads , 2000 .

[30]  I. Biederman,et al.  Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  R. E. Parker Picture processing during recognition. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  The Role of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal and Visual Information: What Is Incongruency? , 1992 .

[33]  Meryl P. Gardner,et al.  Does Attitude toward the Ad Affect Brand Attitude under a Brand Evaluation Set? , 1985 .

[34]  Barbara J. Phillips Thinking into it: Consumer Interpretation of Complex Advertising Images , 1997 .

[35]  J. Schroeder Visual Analysis of Images in Brand Culture , 2008 .

[36]  J M Kennedy,et al.  Are Metaphors Elliptical Similes? , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[37]  S. Kaplan,et al.  A conceptual analysis of form and content in visual metaphors , 1992 .

[38]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude? , 1981 .

[39]  Tom Reichert,et al.  The Message is in the Metaphor: Assessing the Comprehension of Metaphors in Advertisements , 1999 .

[40]  John M Kennedy,et al.  Metaphor in Pictures , 1982, Perception.

[41]  H. Rao Unnava,et al.  An Imagery-Processing View of the Role of Pictures in Print Advertisements , 1991 .

[42]  B. Indurkhya Modes of Metaphor , 1991 .

[43]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1989 .

[44]  A. McCabe Effect of Different Contexts on Memory for Metaphor , 1988 .

[45]  Linda M. Scott,et al.  Images in Advertising: The Need for a Theory of Visual Rhetoric , 1994 .

[46]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  INDIRECT PERSUASION IN ADVERTISING: How Consumers Process Metaphors Presented in Pictures and Words , 2005 .

[47]  Jacqueline Claire Hitchon The Locus of Metaphorical Persuasion: An Empirical Test , 1997 .

[48]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  The Fundamental Templates of Quality Ads , 1999 .

[49]  A. Friedman Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  Metaphor and Thought: Observations on the pragmatics of metaphor , 1993 .