Regulatory decisions should be made in the most expert and informed way since they are precipitated by real and perceived threats to human health, under the glare of public scrutiny. In 1994, the National Research Council (NRC) reported that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA's) overall approach to assessing risks is fundamentally sound, but the Agency must more clearly establish the scientific and policy basis for risk estimates and better communicate the associated uncertainties. On March 21, 1995, USEPA issued a risk characterization policy and guidance. In this policy, an effective risk characterization must fully and clearly characterize risks and disclose the scientific analysis, uncertainties, assumptions, and science policy that underlie decisions throughout the risk assessment process. A number of regulatory reform bills which required risk characterization as part of all Federal risk assessments were introduced by the 104th Congress. The purpose of this workshop was to familiarize Society of Toxicology members with: (1) key elements to be considered in risk characterization and (2) new advances in risk characterization addressed by Federal and State agencies, industry, academia, NRC, and Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management. Furthermore, the main objective was to engage the audience in discussing the proper role of science in risk assessment-risk management interface to make informed decisions in the face of scientific uncertainty.
[1]
John D. Graham,et al.
Risk assessment and clean air policy
,
1991
.
[2]
Use of the reference dose in risk characterization of drinking water contaminants
,
1995
.
[3]
G. L. Eilrich.
Tracking the fate of residues from the farm gate to the table
,
1991
.
[4]
Arthur C. Upton,et al.
Are There Thresholds for Cartinogenesis? a
,
1988
.
[5]
R. Jackson,et al.
Pesticides and food safety.
,
1989,
Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[6]
M. Morris.
Understanding Risk - Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society
,
1997
.
[7]
R. McClellan.
A commentary on the NRC report "Science and judgment in risk assessment".
,
1994,
Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[8]
A C Upton,et al.
Are there thresholds for carcinogenesis? The thorny problem of low-level exposure.
,
1988,
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[9]
J S Evans,et al.
Use of probabilistic expert judgment in uncertainty analysis of carcinogenic potency.
,
1994,
Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[10]
Division on Earth.
Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process
,
1983
.
[11]
H. Fineberg,et al.
Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society
,
1996
.
[12]
U. Epa.
Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment
,
1986
.