Behavior and Cognition as a Complex Adaptive System: Insights from Robotic Experiments

Publisher Summary This chapter focuses on the evidence collected in robotic research with particular reference to results obtained in experiments in which the robots develop their skill autonomously while they interact with the external environment through an adaptive process. In particular, it demonstrates how the behavioral and cognitive skills developed by the robots can be properly characterized as complex adaptive systems which: arise from the interactions between the brain of the robots, their body, and the environment and eventually between the dynamical process occurring within the robot and within the environment; display a multi-level and a multi-scale organization in which the interaction between behavioral and cognitive properties at a certain level of organization lead to higher-level properties and in which higher-level properties later affect the lower-level properties. The complex system nature of behavior and cognition has important consequences both from an engineering and a modeling point of view. From the point of view of developing effective robotic artifacts, it implies the need to rely on “design for emergence” techniques, i.e. techniques allowing the development of robots which are able to exploit useful emergent properties. From the point of view of modeling biological systems, it implies the need to conceptualize behavior and cognition as dynamical processes which unfold in time while the organism interacts with the environment.

[1]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Emergence of communication in embodied agents evolved for the ability to solve a collective navigation problem , 2007, Connect. Sci..

[2]  Naohiro Fukumura,et al.  Self-organizing Internal Representation in Learning of Navigation: A Physical Experiment by the Mobile Robot YAMABICO , 1997, Neural Networks.

[3]  Stewart W. Wilson,et al.  From Animals to Animats 5. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior , 1997 .

[4]  Ezequiel A. Di Paolo,et al.  The evolution of control and adaptation in a 3D powered passive dynamic walker , 2004 .

[5]  Jeffrey L. Krichmar,et al.  Evolutionary robotics: The biology, intelligence, and technology of self-organizing machines , 2001, Complex..

[6]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Power and the limits of reactive agents , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[7]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  Morphological computation for adaptive behavior and cognition , 2006 .

[8]  Tad McGeer,et al.  Passive walking with knees , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Aude Billard,et al.  May We Have Your Attention: Analysis of a Selective Attention Task , 2004 .

[10]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Active Perception: A Sensorimotor Account of Object Categorization , 2002 .

[11]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  Mobile Robot Miniaturisation: A Tool for Investigation in Control Algorithms , 1993, ISER.

[12]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Behaviour as a Complex Adaptive System: On the Role of Self-Organization in the Development of Individual and Collective Behaviour , 2004, Complexus.

[13]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Understanding intelligence , 2020, Inequality by Design.

[14]  Jun Tani,et al.  Learning Semantic Combinatoriality from the Interaction between Linguistic and Behavioral Processes , 2005, Adapt. Behav..

[15]  Dario Floreano,et al.  From Animals to Animats 2: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  F. Keijzer Representation and Behavior , 2001 .

[17]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  The brain has a body: adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  On the Coupling Between Agent Internal and Agent/ Environmental Dynamics: Development of Spatial Representations in Evolving Autonomous Robots , 2008, Adapt. Behav..

[19]  Thomas P. von Hoff,et al.  Adaptive step-size control in blind source separation , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[20]  Yasuo Kuniyoshi,et al.  Embedded neural networks: exploiting constraints , 1998, Neural Networks.

[21]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Distributed Coordination of Simulated Robots Based on Self-Organization , 2006, Artificial Life.

[22]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  Further Experiments in the Evolution of Minimally Cognitive Behavior: From Perceiving Affordances to Selective Attention , 2000 .

[23]  Luca Maria Gambardella,et al.  c ○ 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. Swarm-Bot: A New Distributed Robotic Concept , 2022 .

[24]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  The Dynamics of Active Categorical Perception in an Evolved Model Agent , 2003, Adapt. Behav..

[25]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  A method for co-evolving morphology and walking pattern of biped humanoid robot , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[26]  Stanley J. Rosenschein,et al.  A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction , 1996 .

[27]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence Without Reason , 1991, IJCAI.

[28]  Chandana Paul,et al.  Making Evolution an Offer It Can't Refuse: Morphology and the Extradimensional Bypass , 2001, ECAL.