Adaptive cost efficient deployment strategy for homogeneous wireless camera sensors

Availability of low cost low power camera sensors is likely to make possible applications that may otherwise have been infeasible. In this paper we investigate a cost efficient camera sensor deployment strategy based on random deployment of homogeneous sensors to monitor and/or surveillance a region of interest. We assume that there are costs associated with the sensors as well as with the deployments and our goal is to minimize the total cost while satisfying the desired coverage requirement. We consider two cases which assume the sensing field is obstacle free or with obstacles, and we develop analytical methods to derive the expected coverage of a single sensor as well as the joint coverage for a given number of homogenous camera sensors. Following this we propose an adaptive sensor deployment strategy, which deploys different number of sensors in each iteration, based on our analytical method. We then evaluate the expected cost of our deployment strategy by deriving expressions for the number of deployments and the number of sensors deployed during each deployment as a function of the probability distributions of joint coverage by sensors. We carry out simulation studies to validate the analytical results. Simulation studies are also used to demonstrate that our deployment strategy leads to near optimal values of sensors and deployments and hence achieves the overall low cost.

[1]  Krishnendu Chakrabarty,et al.  Sensor deployment and target localization based on virtual forces , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[2]  John Stanley,et al.  Applying Video Sensor Networks to Nearshore Environment Monitoring , 2003, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[3]  B. Ripley,et al.  Introduction to the Theory of Coverage Processes. , 1989 .

[4]  Stan Sclaroff,et al.  Optimal Placement of Cameras in Floorplans to Satisfy Task Requirements and Cost Constraints , 2004 .

[5]  Anish Arora,et al.  Barrier coverage with wireless sensors , 2005, MobiCom '05.

[6]  Krishnendu Chakrabarty,et al.  Sensor placement for effective coverage and surveillance in distributed sensor networks , 2003, 2003 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking, 2003. WCNC 2003..

[7]  Radha Poovendran,et al.  Stochastic coverage in heterogeneous sensor networks , 2006, TOSN.

[8]  Parameswaran Ramanathan,et al.  Sensor Deployment Strategy for Detection of Targets Traversing a Region , 2003, Mob. Networks Appl..

[9]  Li-Hsing Yen,et al.  Expected k-coverage in wireless sensor networks , 2006, Ad Hoc Networks.

[10]  Mauro Leoncini,et al.  Analysis of a wireless sensor dropping problem in wide-area environmental monitoring , 2005, IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005..

[11]  Hairong Qi,et al.  Coverage Estimation in the Presence of Occlusions for Visual Sensor Networks , 2008, DCOSS.

[12]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Cyclops: in situ image sensing and interpretation in wireless sensor networks , 2005, SenSys '05.

[13]  S. Sitharama Iyengar,et al.  Grid Coverage for Surveillance and Target Location in Distributed Sensor Networks , 2002, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[14]  Wenye Wang,et al.  Self-orienting wireless multimedia sensor networks for occlusion-free viewpoints , 2008, Comput. Networks.