Facilitating sensorimotor integration via blocked practice underpins imitation learning of atypical biological kinematics in autism spectrum disorder

The reduced efficacy of voluntary imitation in autism is suggested to be underpinned by differences in sensorimotor processing. We examined whether the imitation of novel atypical biological kinematics by autistic adults is enhanced by imitating a model in a predictable blocked practice trial order. This practice structure is expected to facilitate trial-to-trial sensorimotor processing, integration and encoding of biological kinematics. The results showed that neurotypical participants were generally more effective at imitating the biological kinematics across all experimental phases. Importantly, and compared to a pre-test where imitation was performed in a randomised (unpredictable) trial order, the autistic participants learned to imitate the atypical kinematics more effectively following an acquisition phase of repeatedly imitating the same model during blocked practice. Data from the post-test showed that autistic participants remained effective at imitating the atypical biological kinematics when the models were subsequently presented in a randomised trial order. These findings show that the reduced efficacy of voluntary imitation in autism can be enhanced during learning by facilitating trial-to-trial processing and integration of sensorimotor information using blocked practice. Lay Abstract Autistic people sometimes find it difficult to copy another person’s movement accurately, especially if the movement is unfamiliar or novel (e.g. to use chop sticks). In this study, we found that autistic people were generally less accurate at copying a novel movement than non-autistic people. However, by making a small adjustment and asking people to copy this movement for a set number of attempts in a predictable manner, we showed that autistic people did successfully learn to copy a new movement. This is a very important finding for autistic people because rather than thinking they cannot copy new movements, all that needs to be considered is for parents/guardians, teachers and/or support workers to make a small adjustment so that learning occurs in a predictable manner for new skills to be successfully acquired through copying. The implications from this study are wide-ranging as copying (imitation) and motor learning are important developmental processes for autistic infants and children to acquire in order to interact within the world. Therefore, practising these behaviours in the most effective way can certainly help the developmental pathway.

[1]  R. Greene,et al.  Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2) elevations in a clinical sample of children and adolescents who do not have autism: Phenotypic profiles of false positives , 2021, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[2]  G. Vivanti,et al.  Object-directed imitation in autism spectrum disorder is differentially influenced by motoric task complexity, but not social contextual cues , 2019, Autism : the international journal of research and practice.

[3]  J. Parr,et al.  Making the future together: Shaping autism research through meaningful participation , 2018, Autism : the international journal of research and practice.

[4]  I. Koch,et al.  Intact mirror mechanisms for automatic facial emotions in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder , 2017, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[5]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Interaction takes two: Typical adults exhibit mind-blindness towards those with autism spectrum disorder. , 2016, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[6]  W. Verwey,et al.  Consolidating behavioral and neurophysiologic findings to explain the influence of contextual interference during motor sequence learning , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  D. Elliott,et al.  Complimentary lower-level and higher-order systems underpin imitation learning , 2016, Brain and Cognition.

[8]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Low Fidelity Imitation of Atypical Biological Kinematics in Autism Spectrum Disorders Is Modulated by Self-Generated Selective Attention , 2015, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

[9]  Geoffrey Bird,et al.  Intact Automatic Imitation and Typical Spatial Compatibility in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Challenging the Broken Mirror Theory , 2015, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[10]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Top-down attentional processes modulate the coding of atypical biological motion kinematics in the absence of motor signals. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Imitation in Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2014 .

[12]  John O. Willis,et al.  Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence , 2014 .

[13]  R. McIntosh,et al.  A Specific Deficit of Imitation in Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2013, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[14]  P. Brambilla,et al.  Preserved Imitation of Known Gestures in Children with High-Functioning Autism , 2013, ISRN neurology.

[15]  D. Elliott,et al.  Visual online control processes are acquired during observational practice. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[16]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Reflecting on the mirror neuron system in autism: A systematic review of current theories , 2013, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Recognizing Biological Motion and Emotions from Point-Light Displays in Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2012, PloS one.

[18]  E. Poliakoff,et al.  Goal-Directed and Goal-Less Imitation in Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2011, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

[19]  C. Winstein,et al.  Learning–performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: A focused review and perspective , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[20]  Simon J. Bennett,et al.  Dissociable contributions of motor-execution and action-observation to intramanual transfer , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Principles of sensorimotor learning , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  Dora M Raymaker,et al.  Collaboration Strategies in Nontraditional Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships: Lessons From an Academic–Community Partnership With Autistic Self-Advocates , 2011, Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action.

[23]  M. Brass,et al.  Hyperimitation of Actions Is Related to Reduced Understanding of Others' Minds in Autism Spectrum Conditions , 2010, Biological Psychiatry.

[24]  James L. Lyons,et al.  Goal-directed aiming: two components but multiple processes. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Ayse Pinar Saygin,et al.  Unaffected Perceptual Thresholds for Biological and Non-Biological Form-from-Motion Perception in Autism Spectrum Conditions , 2010, PloS one.

[26]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Intact imitation of emotional facial actions in autism spectrum conditions , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Simon J. Bennett,et al.  General motor representations are developed during action-observation , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Susan S. Jones,et al.  The development of imitation in infancy , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Richard J. Krauzlis,et al.  Spatial allocation of attention during smooth pursuit eye movements , 2009, Vision Research.

[30]  C. Heyes,et al.  Weak imitative performance is not due to a functional ‘mirroring’ deficit in adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Imitation and action understanding in autistic spectrum disorders: How valid is the hypothesis of a deficit in the mirror neuron system? , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  C. Heyes,et al.  Intact automatic imitation of human and robot actions in autism spectrum disorders , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  G. Dawson,et al.  EEG mu rhythm and imitation impairments in individuals with autism spectrum disorder , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[34]  James L. Lyons,et al.  A kinematic analysis of how young adults with and without autism plan and control goal-directed movements. , 2006, Motor control.

[35]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Common and Differential Neural Mechanisms Supporting Imitation of Meaningful and Meaningless Actions , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Guadagnoli,et al.  Challenge Point: A Framework for Conceptualizing the Effects of Various Practice Conditions in Motor Learning , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[37]  A. Whiten,et al.  A Systematic Review of Action Imitation in Autistic Spectrum Disorder , 2004, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[38]  G. Barnes,et al.  Human ocular pursuit during the transient disappearance of a visual target. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  D. Perrett,et al.  Imitation, mirror neurons and autism , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[40]  W. Helsen,et al.  A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  D. Wright,et al.  Motor programming during practice conditions high and low in contextual interference. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  N. Rinehart,et al.  Movement Preparation in High-Functioning Autism and Asperger Disorder: A Serial Choice Reaction Time Task Involving Motor Reprogramming , 2001, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[43]  D. Wright,et al.  An Assessment of the Attention Demands during Random- and Blocked-Practice Schedules , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[44]  R. Hobson,et al.  Imitation and identification in autism. , 1999, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[45]  F. Brady A Theoretical and Empirical Review of the Contextual Interference Effect and the Learning of Motor Skills , 1998 .

[46]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[47]  B. Pennington,et al.  Imitation and pantomime in high-functioning adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. , 1996, Child development.

[48]  B. Pennington,et al.  A theoretical approach to the deficits in infantile autism , 1991, Development and Psychopathology.

[49]  R. Magill,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE EFFECT IN MOTOR SKILL ACQUISITION , 1990 .

[50]  Bruce Thompson,et al.  Planned versus Unplanned and Orthogonal versus Nonorthogonal Contrasts: The Neo-Classical Perspective. , 1990 .

[51]  D. Elliott,et al.  Contextual Interference Effects during Skill Acquisition and Transfer in Down’s Syndrome Adolescents , 1986 .

[52]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[53]  J. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. , 1979 .

[54]  W. Demyer,et al.  Imitation in autistic, early schizophrenic, and non-psychotic subnormal children , 1972, Journal of autism and childhood schizophrenia.

[55]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Atypical biological motion kinematics are represented by complementary lower-level and top-down processes during imitation learning. , 2016, Acta psychologica.

[56]  C. Heyes,et al.  Imitation in infancy: the wealth of the stimulus. , 2011, Developmental science.

[57]  P. van Donkelaar,et al.  The allocation of attention during smooth pursuit eye movements. , 2002, Progress in brain research.

[58]  W. Prinz,et al.  Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. , 2001, Acta psychologica.