Efficient ERT measuring and inversion strategies for 3D imaging of buried antiquities

ABSTRACT The optimum processing technique (2D vs. 3D inversion) to interpret and visualize parallel and/or orthogonal two‐dimensional surface Electrical Resistivity Tomography data collected from archaeological sites is examined in this work. A simple modification of a standard resistance‐meter geophysical instrument was implemented in order to collect parallel two‐dimensional sections along the X‐, Y‐ or XY‐direction in a relatively short time, employing a pole–pole array. The sensitivity analysis showed that the distance between the parallel 2D lines must be smaller or, at the most, equal to the basic inter‐electrode spacing in order to produce reliable 3D resistivity images of the subsurface. This was confirmed by modelling and inversion of both synthetic and real data. Direct comparisons of the quasi‐3D images, resulting from a posteriori combination of the inverted 2D sections, with the full 3D inverted resistivity models indicated the superiority of the 3D inversion algorithm in the reconstruction of buried archaeological structures, even in complex archaeological sites. Due to the inherent three‐dimensionality of many archaeological targets, quasi‐3D images suffer from artefacts. The combination of a single survey‐direction with a full 3D processing and interpretation scheme is adequate to image the 3D subsurface resistivity variation in detail. Furthermore, the implementation of a quasi‐Newton Jacobian matrix update technique reduced the processing time by one‐half without any significant loss of accuracy and resolution.

[1]  R. Barker,et al.  Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion1 , 1996 .

[2]  Alan C. Tripp,et al.  Two-dimensional resistivity inversion , 1984 .

[3]  R. Barker,et al.  Rapid least-squared inversion of apparent resisitivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method , 1996 .

[4]  A. Clark,et al.  Seeing Beneath the Soil: Prospecting Methods in Archaeology , 1992 .

[5]  Yutaka Sasaki,et al.  Two‐dimensional joint inversion of magnetotelluric and dipole‐dipole resistivity data , 1989 .

[6]  R. Huggins,et al.  Geophysical Surveying of Archaeological Sites , 1985 .

[7]  Torleif Dahlin,et al.  Short note on electrode charge‐up effects in DC resistivity data acquisition using multi‐electrode arrays , 2000 .

[8]  Biwen Xu,et al.  Archaeological investigation by electrical resistivity tomography: a preliminary study , 1991 .

[9]  D. H. Griffiths,et al.  Electrical Imaging in Archaeology , 1994 .

[10]  T. Dahlin,et al.  Quasi-3D resistivity imaging - mapping of three dimensional structures using two dimensional DC resistivity techniques , 1997 .

[11]  A. T. Basokur,et al.  Detecting small‐scale targets by the 2D inversion of two‐sided three‐electrode data: application to an archaeological survey , 2001 .

[12]  G. Leucci Contribution of Ground Penetrating Radar and Electrical Resistivity Tomography to identify the cavity and fractures under the main Church in Botrugno (Lecce, Italy) , 2006 .

[13]  D. H. Griffiths,et al.  TWO DIMENSIONAL RESISTIVITY MAPPING WITH A COMPUTER-CONTROLLED ARRAY , 1990 .

[14]  P. Tsourlos Modelling, interpretation and inversion of multielectrode resistivity survey data , 1995 .

[15]  T. Dahlin The development of DC resistivity imaging techniques , 2001 .

[16]  L. S. Edwards,et al.  A modified pseudosection for resistivity and IP , 1977 .

[17]  R. Barker,et al.  Least-squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections , 1995 .

[18]  A large scale geophysical survey in the archaeological site of Europos (northern Greece) , 1994 .

[19]  Ana Osella,et al.  3D electrical imaging of an archaeological site using electrical and electromagnetic methods , 2005 .

[20]  C. G. Broyden A Class of Methods for Solving Nonlinear Simultaneous Equations , 1965 .

[21]  S. Constable,et al.  Occam's inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models from magnetotelluric data , 1990 .

[22]  R. Parker,et al.  Occam's inversion; a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data , 1987 .

[23]  Ettore Cardarelli,et al.  2D data modelling by electrical resistivity tomography for complex subsurface geology , 2006 .

[24]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  METHODS FOR CALCULATING FRÉCHET DERIVATIVES AND SENSITIVITIES FOR THE NON‐LINEAR INVERSE PROBLEM: A COMPARATIVE STUDY1 , 1990 .

[25]  Laurence R. Bentley,et al.  Resolution of 3-D Electrical Resistivity Images from Inversions of 2-D Orthogonal Lines , 2005 .

[26]  Archaeological geophysics in East Anglia, UK , 2002 .

[27]  Biwen Xu,et al.  ON THE COMPLETENESS OF DATA SETS WITH MULTIELECTRODE SYSTEMS FOR ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY SURVEY , 1993 .

[28]  M. Mohamaden,et al.  Electrical resistivity exploration of the Royal Ptolemic Necropolis in the Royal Quarter of Ancient Alexandria, Egypt , 1999 .