Gender bias in the Erasmus network of universities

The Erasmus Program (EuRopean community Action Scheme for the Mobility of University Students), the most important student exchange program in the world, financed by the European Union and started in 1987, is characterized by a strong gender bias. Female students participate to the program more than male students. This work quantifies the gender bias in the Erasmus program between 2008 and 2013, using novel data at the university level. It describes the structure of the program in great detail, carrying out the analysis across fields of study, and identifies key universities as senders and receivers. In addition, it tests the difference in the degree distribution of the Erasmus network along time and between genders, giving evidence of a greater density in the female Erasmus network with respect to the one of the male Erasmus network.

[1]  P. McCann,et al.  Some Evidence that Women are More Mobile than Men: Gender Differences in U.K. Graduate Migration Behavior , 2007 .

[2]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Understanding Large Temporal Networks and Spatial Networks , 2014 .

[3]  Q. Vuong.  Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses , 1989 .

[4]  Noemi Derzsy,et al.  Topology of the Erasmus student mobility network , 2011 .

[5]  C. Engel.  The impact of Erasmus mobility on the professional career: Empirical results of international studies on temporary student and teaching staff mobility , 2010 .

[6]  Colin S Gillespie,et al.  Fitting Heavy Tailed Distributions: The poweRlaw Package , 2014, 1407.3492.

[7]  R. M. Myers,et al.  The Geography of Gender Inequality in International Higher Education , 2018, Journal of Studies in International Education.

[8]  D. Helbing,et al.  Gender Gap in the ERASMUS Mobility Program , 2016, PloS one.

[9]  Giuseppe Moro,et al.  Evaluating the impact of the Erasmus programme: skills and European identity , 2015 .

[10]  L. Benedictis.  Three Decades of Italian Comparative Advantages , 2005 .

[11]  Jon M Kleinberg,et al.  Hubs, authorities, and communities , 1999, CSUR.

[12]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Understanding Large Temporal Networks and Spatial Networks: Exploration, Pattern Searching, Visualization and Network Evolution , 2014 .

[13]  Scientific.  International Standard Classification of Education, ISCED 1997 , 2003 .

[14]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[15]  Freidholm Maiworm.  ERASMUS: Continuity and Change in the 1990s , 2001 .

[16]  Reka Albert,et al.  Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks , 1999 .

[17]  Silvia Rueda,et al.  Gender Diversity in STEM Disciplines: A Multiple Factor Problem , 2019, Entropy.

[18]  P. Bryła.  The Impact of International Student Mobility on Subsequent Employment and Professional Career: A Large-Scale Survey among Polish Former Erasmus Students , 2015 .

[19]  Vesna Skrbinjek,et al.  Erasmus student mobility flows , 2020 .

[20]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[21]  Max Moldovan,et al.  Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Status and Longitudinal Changes in Weight and Waist Circumference: Influence of Genetic Predisposition to Adiposity , 2016, PloS one.

[22]  R. Shields.  Globalization and International Student Mobility: A Network Analysis , 2013, Comparative Education Review.

[23]  E. Rossi-Hansberg,et al.  Commuting, Migration and Local Employment Elasticities , 2015, American Economic Review.

[24]  M. P. Vitale,et al.  Analysing International Student Mobility Flows in Higher Education: A Comparative Study on European Countries , 2020 .

[25]  M. Parey,et al.  Downloading Wisdom from Online Crowds , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[26]  Karina Oborune.  Becoming more European after ERASMUS? The Impact of the ERASMUS Programme on Political and Cultural Identity , 2013 .