Do matters of concern matter? Bringing issues back to participation

The objective of our article is twofold. First, we claim that the theoretical planning discussion dealing with public participation has forgotten one basic principle, namely that the people are taking part in the planning process because they are interested in a particular issue. There is a need for new conceptual approaches in participatory research which carry the discussion first towards the issues, then to the structures of participation. For this reason, we have combined practice-oriented policy analysis with the recent discussion of issue politics. Second, we implement the key propositions of the theoretical debate in an empirical case. The aim is to indicate how the trajectory of the issue, as well as its continuities and discontinuities, develop in diverse ways in different civic forums. We claim that this perspective provides more information for researchers, civil servants and citizens about the logic of participatory practice.

[1]  F. Fischer.  Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge , 2000 .

[2]  Kenneth N. McKay,et al.  The Scheduler’s Predictive Expertise: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1992 .

[3]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[4]  G. Rowe,et al.  Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda , 2004 .

[5]  Charles Hoch,et al.  Evaluating Plans Pragmatically , 2002 .

[6]  Samuel D. Brody,et al.  Measuring the Effects of Stakeholder Participation on the Quality of Local Plans Based on the Principles of Collaborative Ecosystem Management , 2003 .

[7]  C. Harrison,et al.  Limits to new public participation practices in local land use planning , 2002 .

[8]  Patsy Healey,et al.  The Pragmatic Tradition in Planning Thought , 2009 .

[9]  P Healey,et al.  Building Institutional Capacity through Collaborative Approaches to Urban Planning , 1998 .

[10]  C. Mouffe.  The Democratic Paradox , 2000 .

[11]  Zhenghong Tang,et al.  Linking Planning Theories with Factors Influencing Local Environmental-Plan Quality , 2009 .

[12]  Frank Fischer,et al.  The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning , 1993 .

[13]  Maarten A. Hajer,et al.  Is That Politics , 2003 .

[14]  Karen Bickerstaff,et al.  Participatory Local Governance and Transport Planning , 2001 .

[15]  J. Feagin,et al.  Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. , 1990 .

[16]  Raine Mäntysalo,et al.  Agonism and institutional ambiguity: Ideas on democracy and the role of participation in the development of planning theory and practice - the case of Finland , 2010 .

[17]  Philip Allmendinger,et al.  Planning in postmodern times , 2001 .

[18]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[19]  Noortje Marres,et al.  The Issues Deserve More Credit , 2007 .

[20]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems , 1999 .

[21]  Liisa Häikiö.  Expertise, Representation and the Common Good: Grounds for Legitimacy in the Urban Governance Network , 2007 .

[22]  A. Madanipour,et al.  Place, identity and local politics: analysing initiatives in deliberative governance , 2003 .

[23]  B. Latour.  Turning Around Politics , 2007 .

[24]  John Pløger,et al.  Public Participation and the Art of Governance , 2001 .

[25]  D. Kolb,et al.  Planning in the Face of Power. , 1988 .

[26]  P. Jones,et al.  Urban Regeneration's Poisoned Chalice: Is There an Impasse in (Community) Participation-based Policy? , 2003 .

[27]  Julia Ledyard,et al.  Citizen participation in planning , 1969 .

[28]  E. Gomart,et al.  Is That Politics? For an inquiry into forms in contemporary politics , 2002 .

[29]  Community, Culture, and Economic Development: The Social Roots of Local Action , 1995 .

[30]  Aija Staffans.  Vaikuttavat asukkaat : vuorovaikutus ja paikallinen tieto kaupunkisuunnittelun haasteina , 2004 .

[31]  Helena Leino,et al.  For the sake of the lake: multi-signification and improvisation in the practices of two lake restoration projects in Finland , 2010 .

[32]  Sherry R. Amstein.  “A Ladder of Citizen Participation” , 1969 .

[33]  Tore Sager,et al.  Journal of Planning Education and Research Deliberative Planning and Decision Making: an Impossibility Result on Behalf Of: Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning , 2022 .

[34]  M. Laine.  Fight Over the Face of Tampere: A Sneaking Transformation of a Local Political Field , 2020, How Nature Speaks.

[35]  S. Harrison.  Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice , 2001 .

[36]  Jean Hillier,et al.  Stretching Beyond the Horizon: A Multiplanar Theory of Spatial Planning and Governance , 2007 .

[37]  Noortje Marres,et al.  Tracing the trajectories of issues, and their democratic deficits, on the Web: The case of the Development Gateway and its doubles , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[38]  A. Irwin.  The Politics of Talk , 2006 .

[39]  M. Hajer.  Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void , 2003 .

[40]  David Thacher.  Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society , 2005 .

[41]  John Pløger,et al.  Strife: Urban Planning and Agonism , 2004 .

[42]  Diana Maccallum.  Participatory Planning and Means-Ends Rationality: A Translation Problem1 , 2008 .

[43]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Public Participation in Planning: New Strategies for the 21st Century , 2000 .