Business intelligence serious game participatory development: lessons from ERPsim for big data

Purpose A major trend in enterprise resource planning software (ERP) is to embed business analytics tools within user-centered roles in enterprise software. This integration allows business users to get better and faster insight to action. As a consequence, it is imperative for business students to learn how to use these new tools to adequately prepare them for new expectations in the industry. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, the authors propose a new serious game, called ERPsim for big data, to enable the learner to acquire abilities at each level of the business analytics learning taxonomy. To maximize the pedagogical impact of the game, participatory design (PD) with professors as co-designers was used during game development. Findings This case study presents the PD approach and analyses the efficacy of the proposed new simulation. Originality/value The authors conclude by providing recommendations and lessons learned from this approach.

[1]  D. Krathwohl A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview , 2002 .

[2]  Babita Gupta,et al.  The Current State of Business Intelligence in Academia: The Arrival of Big Data , 2014, CAIS.

[3]  Timothy Paul Cronan,et al.  Developing and Assessing Erp Competencies: Basic and Complex Knowledge , 2016, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Olivier Caya,et al.  Integrating, sharing, and sourcing knowledge in an ERP usage context , 2014 .

[5]  Asimina Vasalou,et al.  Bridging serious games and participatory design , 2014, Int. J. Child Comput. Interact..

[6]  Kim Halskov,et al.  The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002-2012 , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  René Riedl,et al.  Emotions and ERP information sourcing: the moderating role of expertise , 2014, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[8]  Hossam Ali-Hassan,et al.  Game-Based Experiential Learning in Online Management Information Systems Classes Using Intel's IT Manager 3 , 2014, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[9]  ksmouk Authentic OM problem solving in ERP context , 2012 .

[10]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design , 2012 .

[11]  C. Hmelo‐Silver,et al.  Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) , 2007 .

[12]  Thomas J. Steenburgh,et al.  Motivating Salespeople: What Really Works , 2012, Harvard business review.

[13]  Gary A. Davis,et al.  Evaluating Business Intelligence / Business Analytics Software for Use in the Information Systems Curriculum , 2015 .

[14]  Juan de Lara,et al.  Supporting user-oriented analysis for multi-view domain-specific visual languages , 2009, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[15]  Erran Carmel,et al.  PD and joint application design: a transatlantic comparison , 1993, CACM.

[16]  E. A. Locke Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social-Cognitive View , 1987 .

[17]  ksmouk Comparing Objective Measures and Perceptions of Cognitive Learning in an ERP Simulation Game , 2010 .

[18]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  End-user training methods: what we know, need to know , 2006, SIGMIS CPR '06.

[19]  Robert Pellerin,et al.  Authentic OM problem solving in an ERP context , 2012 .

[20]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  How In-memory Technology Can Create Business Value: Insights from the Hilti Case , 2014, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Rex Hartson,et al.  The UX book, process and guidelines for ensuring a quality user experience by Rex Hartson and Pardha S. Pyla , 2012, SOEN.

[22]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Neurophysiological correlates of cognitive absorption in an enactive training context , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Gilbert Babin ERP Simulation Game with SAP ERP : Manufacturing Game , 2011 .

[24]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  An Investigation of the Appropriation of Technology-Mediated Training Methods Incorporating Enactive and Collaborative Learning , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  T. Davenport,et al.  Data scientist: the sexiest job of the 21st century. , 2012, Harvard business review.