Diagnostic Precision of Ultrasonography in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Keleş I, Kendi ATK, Aydın G, Zöğ ŞG, Orkun S: Diagnostic precision of ultrasonography in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84:443–450. Objective:To evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasonography in patients with electrophysiologically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome. Design:A prospective ultrasonographic study of 35 wrists with electrophysiologically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome and of 40 normal wrists. Receiver-operating-characteristics curves for the ultrasonographic measurements of median nerve were plotted to identify the most optimal cutoff values. Results:The ultrasonographic measurements of median nerves were found to be increased significantly in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome when compared with controls, particularly in terms of cross-sectional area (P < 0.001) and the bowing of the flexor retinaculum (P < 0.01) but not in the flattening ratio (P > 0.05). According to receiver-operating-characteristics curve results, the most optimal cutoff value for the cross-sectional area of the median nerve was obtained at the level of middle carpal tunnel, which was 9.3 mm2, with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 77.5%. The optimal cutoff value for the bowing of the flexor retinaculum was 3.7 mm, with a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 55%. No optimum cutoff value could be identified from the receiver-operating-characteristics curves for the flattening ratio of median nerve. Conclusion:Ultrasonographic examination of the median nerve seems to be a promising method in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome, evaluating the morphologic changes of the median nerve in patients with clinical signs and symptoms. Further studies with wider series are needed to confirm our preliminary results.

[1]  Practice parameter for carpal tunnel syndrome (Summary statement) , 1993, Neurology.

[2]  T. M. Burns.  Carpal tunnel sonography by the rheumatologist versus nerve conduction study by the neurologist. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.

[3]  J. Griffith,et al.  Discriminatory sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  G. Doyle,et al.  Carpal Tunnel Syndrome – Is High-Frequency Ultrasound a Useful Diagnostic Tool? , 2003, Journal of hand surgery.

[5]  M L Bleecker,et al.  Carpal tunnel syndrome , 1985, Neurology.

[6]  W. Girsch,et al.  The precision of ultrasound imaging and its relevance for carpal tunnel syndrome , 2001, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[7]  W. Buchberger,et al.  Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis with high-resolution sonography. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  A. I. Baysal,et al.  Sensitivity of Median Sensory Nerve Conduction Tests in Digital Branches for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome , 2004, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[9]  L. Visser,et al.  Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: A critical review of the literature , 2003, Muscle & nerve.

[10]  L. Kamolz,et al.  Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Question of Hand and Wrist Configurations? , 2004, Journal of hand surgery.

[11]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Carpal tunnel sonography by the rheumatologist versus nerve conduction study by the neurologist. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.

[12]  J. Stevens,et al.  Carpal tunnel syndrome with normal nerve conduction studies , 2004, Muscle & nerve.

[13]  Sullivan,et al.  Sonography in the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  K. Nakamichi,et al.  Ultrasonographic measurement of median nerve cross‐sectional area in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: Diagnostic accuracy , 2002, Muscle & nerve.

[15]  T. Cabada,et al.  Carpal tunnel syndrome: usefulness of sonography , 2000, European Radiology.

[16]  P. Seror.  Carpal tunnel sonography by the rheumatologist versus nerve conduction study by the neurologist. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.

[17]  G. Fuller,et al.  FOCAL PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHIES , 2003, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[18]  B. Hamm,et al.  Carpal tunnel syndrome: Staging of median nerve compression by MR imaging , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  J. Hodler,et al.  Dynamic MR imaging of carpal tunnel syndrome , 1997, Skeletal Radiology.

[20]  K. Nakamichi,et al.  Enlarged median nerve in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome , 2000, Muscle & nerve.

[21]  M. V. van Holsbeeck,et al.  Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Ultrasound versus electromyography. , 1999, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[22]  D. Habes,et al.  Carpal tunnel area as a risk factor for carpal tunnel syndrome , 1990, Muscle & nerve.

[23]  W. Kenn,et al.  Technical advances in ultrasound and MR imaging of carpal tunnel syndrome , 2000, European Radiology.

[24]  W. Buchberger,et al.  High‐resolution ultrasonography of the carpal tunnel. , 1991, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[25]  E. W. Johnson,et al.  Wrist dimensions: correlation with median sensory latencies. , 1983, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.