Enhancing student innovation: Physical models in the idea generation process

Innovation and engineering creativity are highly sought after skills. Unfortunately, little guidance exists for developing and teaching these critical skills. Physical representations ranging from simple, very rough models to full working prototypes are common within the design process and are a likely tool for supporting innovation. There are varied and conflicting recommendations on when physical models should be employed. Some studies suggest physical models cause design fixation. Design fixation is when designers think of a particular concept and it limits the ideas they are able to generate. The effects of physical models in the idea generation process were explored through a controlled experiment comparing participants who sketched, built, or built & tested their concepts. Results show that physical models overcome gaps in designers' mental models thus producing a greater number of functional ideas that solve the design problem. In addition, physical models appear to not cause design fixation but a larger sample size is required to verify this result. Similar levels of novelty and variety are observed across the conditions.

[1]  Mike Baxter,et al.  Product Design: A Practical Guide to Systematic Methods of New Product Development , 1995 .

[2]  Mary Lou Maher,et al.  The Impact of Tangible User Interfaces on Designers' Spatial Cognition , 2008, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Kenneth D. Forbus Qualitative Process Theory , 1984, Artificial Intelligence.

[5]  Rosario Vidal,et al.  Effectiveness of the means of expression in creative problem-solving in design groups , 2004 .

[6]  T. B. Ward,et al.  The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[7]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[8]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  A study of prototypes, design activity, and design outcome , 2005 .

[9]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  “Collaborating To Success”: An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques , 2005 .

[10]  Cees van Leeuwen,et al.  Sketches from a Design Process: Creative Cognition Inferred From Intermediate Products , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[12]  T. B. Ward Structured Imagination: the Role of Category Structure in Exemplar Generation , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Knowledge Representation , 1998 .

[14]  Matti Perttula,et al.  The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation , 2007 .

[15]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. , 1991, The American journal of psychology.

[16]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Two Theories of Home Heat Control , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  A. John Mallinckrodt,et al.  Qualitative reasoning: Modeling and simulation with incomplete knowledge , 1994, at - Automatisierungstechnik.

[18]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  Effort-saving product representations in design—results of a questionnaire survey , 2001 .

[19]  David Clark-Carter,et al.  Doing Quantitative Psychological Research: From Design To Report , 1997 .

[20]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: Effectiveness metrics and design of experiments , 2000 .