INJUSTICE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT: THE MODERATING EFFECT OF POWER RESTORATION

This experiment investigated the causal links between injustice and interpersonal conflict. Previous research has suggested two possible explanations. One group of theorists has argued for a pragmatic model, whereby individuals engage in interpersonal conflict in order to maximize personal gain. Justice is, at most, a secondary consideration. Alternatively, others have suggested that perceived unfairness is a crucial element in conflict. The present study tested these two frameworks. As predicted, results were generally consistent with the justice model. However, the expression of conflict only took place when there was no opportunity for power restoration. Results are discussed in terms of the situation's impact on conflict behavior. Limitations of the present research design are noted.

[1]  J. D. McCarthy,et al.  Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  R. Baron Reducing the influence of an aggressive model: The restraining effects of peer censure , 1972 .

[3]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Approaching Equity and Avoiding Inequity in Groups and Organizations , 1982 .

[4]  Christopher L. Martin,et al.  Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects , 1986 .

[5]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow , 1990 .

[6]  R. Baron,et al.  Negative effects of destructive criticism: impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. , 1988, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  Merrill Carlsmith Methods of research in social psychology , 1976 .

[8]  S. Worchel,et al.  Aggression and power restoration: The effects of identifiability and timing on aggressive behavior , 1978 .

[9]  K. Ohbuchi,et al.  Apology as aggression control: its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  E. Suchman,et al.  The American Soldier: Adjustment During Army Life. , 1949 .

[11]  T. Tyler The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. , 1989 .

[12]  Robert A. Baron,et al.  Attributions and organizational conflict: The mediating role of apparent sincerity , 1988 .

[13]  A. Isen,et al.  The Influence of Positive Affect and Visual Access on the Discovery of Integrative Solutions in Bilateral Negotiation , 1986 .

[14]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[15]  F. Crosby Relative deprivation in organizational settings. , 1984 .

[16]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[17]  R. Folger,et al.  Referent Cognitions and Task Decision Autonomy: Beyond Equity Theory , 1989 .

[18]  Paul D. Sweeney,et al.  Using relative deprivation theory to explain satisfaction with income and pay level: A multistudy examination. , 1990 .

[19]  Stephen B. Goldberg,et al.  Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Costs of Conflict , 1993 .

[20]  Philip Bobko,et al.  A solution to some dilemmas when testing hypotheses about ordinal interactions. , 1986 .

[21]  J. Tedeschi,et al.  A reinterpretation of research on aggression. , 1974, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  R. Kessler,et al.  Effects of daily stress on negative mood. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  R. Baron Reducing organizational conflict: The role of attributions. , 1985 .

[24]  S. Robbins,et al.  “Conflict Management” and “Conflict Resolution” are Not Synonymous Terms , 1978, California management review.

[25]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Equity Theory Revisited: Comments and Annotated Bibliography , 1976 .

[26]  Robert A. Baron,et al.  Countering the effects of destructive criticism: The relative efficacy of four interventions. , 1990 .

[27]  A Monte Carlo evaluation of Bobko's ordinal interaction analysis technique. , 1989 .

[28]  P. Brickman,et al.  Moral outrage and pragmatism: Explanations for collective action ☆ , 1984 .

[29]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Equity and Justice in Social Behavior , 1982 .

[30]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgments. , 1987 .

[31]  Blair H. Sheppard Third party conflict intervention: A procedural framework. , 1984 .

[32]  F. Crosby,et al.  An empirical examination of relative deprivation theory , 1980 .

[33]  F. Crosby,et al.  A model of egoistical relative deprivation. , 1976 .

[34]  Philip Bobko,et al.  Testing hypotheses about ordinal interactions: Simulations and further comments. , 1989 .

[35]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the means justify the ends? , 1987 .

[36]  R. Folger,et al.  Responses to relative deprivation: A conceptual framework. , 1984 .

[37]  M. Mark Expectations, procedural justice, and alternative reactions to being deprived of a desired outcome , 1985 .

[38]  Joel Cooper,et al.  When Push Comes to Power: A Test of Power Restoration Theory's Explanation for Aggressive Conflict Escalation , 1987 .

[39]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .