Finite element application in implant research for treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease.

Surgical treatment for disc degeneration can be roughly grouped as fusion, disc replacement and dynamic stabilization. The clinical efficacy and biomechanical features of the implants used for disc degenerations can be evaluated through short- or long-term follow up observation, in vitro and in vivo experiments and computational simulations. Finite element models are already making an important contribution to our understanding of the spine and its components. Models are being used to reveal the biomechanical function of the spine and its behavior when healthy, diseased or damaged. They are also providing support in the design and application of spinal instrumentation. The article reviewed the most recent studies in the application of FE models that address the issue of implant research for treatment of low back pain. The published studies were grouped and reviewed thoroughly based on the function of implants investigated. The considerations of the finite element analysis in these studies were further discussed.

[1]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Effect of Total Disc Replacement with ProDisc on Intersegmental Rotation of the Lumbar Spine , 2005, Spine.

[2]  Herbert A. Mang,et al.  The Fifth World Congress on Computational Mechanics , 2002 .

[3]  Stephen J. Ferguson,et al.  Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[4]  Naresh Kumar,et al.  Analysis of Stress Distribution in Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 2005, Spine.

[5]  W. Steudel,et al.  The Effect of Posterior Instrumentation Following PLIF with BAK Cages is most Pronounced in Weak Bone , 2002, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[6]  S. Chou,et al.  Investigation of fixation screw pull-out strength on human spine. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Comparison of the mechanical behavior of the lumbar spine following mono- and bisegmental stabilization. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  R-M Lin,et al.  Biomechanical investigation of pedicle screw-vertebrae complex: a finite element approach using bonded and contact interface conditions. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  A D Steffee,et al.  A Carbon Fiber Implant to Aid Interbody Lumbar Fusion: Two‐Year Clinical Results in the First 26 Patients , 1993, Spine.

[10]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Effects of fusion-bone stiffness on the mechanical behavior of the lumbar spine after vertebral body replacement. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Internal spinal fixator stiffness has only a minor influence on stresses in the adjacent discs. , 1999, Spine.

[12]  Josep A Planell,et al.  Finite Element Study of a Novel Intervertebral Disc Substitute , 2005, Spine.

[13]  M J Fagan,et al.  Finite element analysis in spine research , 2002, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[15]  J D Clausen,et al.  Finite element methods in spine biomechanics research. , 1995, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[16]  Y Kim,et al.  Prediction of Mechanical Behaviors at Interfaces Between Bone and Two Interbody Cages of Lumbar Spine Segments , 2001, Spine.

[17]  Manohar M Panjabi,et al.  Effects of Charité Artificial Disc on the Implanted and Adjacent Spinal Segments Mechanics Using a Hybrid Testing Protocol , 2005, Spine.

[18]  Pasquale Vena,et al.  A finite element model of the L4–L5 spinal motion segment: biomechanical compatibility of an interspinous device , 2005, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[19]  Fabio Galbusera,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of cages for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[20]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Effect of a posterior dynamic implant adjacent to a rigid spinal fixator. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  D. Ku,et al.  Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[23]  Zheng-Cheng Zhong,et al.  Finite element analysis of the lumbar spine with a new cage using a topology optimization method. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[24]  Stephen J. Ferguson,et al.  The importance of the endplate for interbody cages in the lumbar spine , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[25]  Chia-Ying Lin,et al.  Interbody Fusion Cage Design Using Integrated Global Layout and Local Microstructure Topology Optimization , 2004, Spine.

[26]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Effect of bone graft characteristics on the mechanical behavior of the lumbar spine. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  Franz Konstantin Fuss,et al.  Finite-element analysis for lumbar interbody fusion under axial loading , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  S. Chueh,et al.  Failure analysis of broken pedicle screws on spinal instrumentation. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[29]  Vijay K. Goel,et al.  Biomechanical Rationale for Using Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Spacers for Lumbar Interbody Fusion–A Finite Element Study , 2006, Spine.

[30]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Load Transfer Mechanisms in Cylindrical Interbody Cage Constructs , 2002, Spine.

[31]  Hans Müller-Storz,et al.  The influence of cancellous bone density on load sharing in human lumbar spine: a comparison between an intact and a surgically altered motion segment , 2001, European Spine Journal.

[32]  Hans Müller-Storz,et al.  Motion of threaded cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[33]  Taiji Adachi,et al.  Effects of a Fixation Screw on Trabecular Structural Changes in a Vertebral Body Predicted by Remodeling Simulation , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  M Parnianpour,et al.  Load-bearing and stress analysis of the human spine under a novel wrapping compression loading. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[35]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Comparison of the biomechanical effects of posterior and anterior spine-stabilizing implants , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[36]  Manohar M. Panjabi,et al.  Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine , 1978 .

[37]  V. Goel,et al.  Load-Sharing Between Anterior and Posterior Elements in a Lumbar Motion Segment Implanted With an Artificial Disc , 2001, Spine.

[38]  Cheng-Kung Cheng,et al.  Biomechanical Comparison of Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With One or Two Cages by Finite Element Analysis , 2006, Spine.

[39]  V. Goel,et al.  Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination. , 2006, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.