Volumetric analysis of day of injury computed tomography is associated with rehabilitation outcomes after traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND Day-of-injury (DOI) brain lesion volumes in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients are rarely used to predict long-term outcomes in the acute setting. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between acute brain injury lesion volume and rehabilitation outcomes in patients with TBI at a level one trauma center. METHODS Patients with TBI who were admitted to our rehabilitation unit after the acute care trauma service from February 2009-July 2011 were eligible for the study. Demographic data and outcome variables including cognitive and motor Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, length of stay (LOS) in the rehabilitation unit, and ability to return to home were obtained. The DOI quantitative injury lesion volumes and degree of midline shift were obtained from DOI brain computed tomography scans. A multiple stepwise regression model including 13 independent variables was created. This model was used to predict postrehabilitation outcomes, including FIM scores and ability to return to home. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS Ninety-six patients were enrolled in the study. Mean age was 43 ± 21 years, admission Glasgow Coma Score was 8.4 ± 4.8, Injury Severity Score was 24.7 ± 9.9, and head Abbreviated Injury Scale score was 3.73 ± 0.97. Acute hospital LOS was 12.3 ± 8.9 days, and rehabilitation LOS was 15.9 ± 9.3 days. Day-of-injury TBI lesion volumes were inversely associated with cognitive FIM scores at rehabilitation admission (p = 0.004) and discharge (p = 0.004) and inversely associated with ability to be discharged to home after rehabilitation (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION In a cohort of patients with moderate to severe TBI requiring a rehabilitation unit stay after the acute care hospital stay, DOI brain injury lesion volumes are associated with worse cognitive FIM scores at the time of rehabilitation admission and discharge. Smaller-injury volumes were associated with eventual discharge to home. Volumetric neuroimaging in the acute injury phase may improve surgeons' ultimate outcome predictions in TBI patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level V.

[1]  P. Aspelin,et al.  MRI‐Defined Corpus Callosal Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis: A Comparison of Volumetric Measurements, Corpus Callosum Area and Index , 2015, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[2]  M. Dijkers,et al.  Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Comparative Effectiveness Research: Introduction to the Traumatic Brain Injury-Practice Based Evidence Archives Supplement. , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  J. Niemeier,et al.  Measures of Injury Severity and Prediction of Acute Traumatic Brain Injury Outcomes , 2015, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[4]  E. Wehling,et al.  Neuropsychological Functioning in a National Cohort of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Demographic and Acute Injury–Related Predictors , 2015, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[5]  Nicholas Lange,et al.  Longitudinal Volumetric Brain Changes in Autism Spectrum Disorder Ages 6–35 Years , 2015, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[6]  R. Hanks,et al.  Comorbidity and insurance as predictors of disability after traumatic brain injury. , 2014, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  Rahul Raj,et al.  Predicting outcome in traumatic brain injury: development of a novel computerized tomography classification system (Helsinki computerized tomography score). , 2014, Neurosurgery.

[8]  E. Deibert,et al.  Lesion analysis in mild traumatic brain injury , 2014, Neurology.

[9]  J. Whyte,et al.  Application and Clinical Utility of the Glasgow Coma Scale Over Time: A Study Employing the NIDRR Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Database , 2014, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[10]  Sue Ramsden,et al.  Gradual Lesion Expansion and Brain Shrinkage Years After Stroke , 2014, Stroke.

[11]  J. Ponsford,et al.  Regional cortical volume and cognitive functioning following traumatic brain injury , 2013, Brain and Cognition.

[12]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  Predicting 14-day mortality after severe traumatic brain injury: application of the IMPACT models in the brain trauma foundation TBI-trac® New York State database. , 2012, Journal of neurotrauma.

[13]  D. Okonkwo,et al.  Prospective independent validation of IMPACT modeling as a prognostic tool in severe traumatic brain injury. , 2012, Journal of neurotrauma.

[14]  D. Tate,et al.  Cerebral Volume Loss, Cognitive Deficit, and Neuropsychological Performance: Comparative Measures of Brain Atrophy: II. Traumatic Brain Injury , 2011, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[15]  W. Liu,et al.  Classification and Prediction of Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury Based on Computed Tomographic Imaging , 2009, The Journal of international medical research.

[16]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and International Validation of Prognostic Scores Based on Admission Characteristics , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[17]  T. Miller,et al.  Incidence of Long‐term Disability Following Traumatic Brain Injury Hospitalization, United States, 2003 , 2008, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[18]  Juan Lu,et al.  IMPACT database of traumatic brain injury: design and description. , 2007, Journal of neurotrauma.

[19]  E. Bigler,et al.  Day-of-Injury Computerized Tomography, Rehabilitation Status, and Development of Cerebral Atrophy in Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury , 2006, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[20]  E. Finkelstein,et al.  Incidence and Economic Burden of Injuries in the United States , 2006 .

[21]  Jake Olivier,et al.  Computed tomography findings and early cognitive outcome after traumatic brain injury , 2006, Brain injury.

[22]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Prediction of Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury with Computed Tomographic Characteristics: A Comparison between the Computed Tomographic Classification and Combinations of Computed Tomographic Predictors , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[23]  K. Schwab,et al.  Quantitative imaging in late TBI. Part II: cognition and work after closed and penetrating head injury: a report of the Vietnam head injury study , 2002, Brain injury.

[24]  K. Schwab,et al.  Quantitive imaging in late traumatic brain injury. Part I: late imaging parameters in closed and penetrating head injuries , 2002, Brain injury.

[25]  A. Yamaura,et al.  Outcome prediction in severe head injury: analyses of clinical prognostic factors , 2001, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[26]  K A Dunn,et al.  Traumatic brain injury in the United States: A public health perspective. , 1999, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[27]  C. Granger,et al.  Validity of the functional independence measure for persons with traumatic brain injury. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  Wayne A. Gordon,et al.  Characteristics and comparisons of functional assessment indices: Disability Rating Scale, Functional Independence Measure, and Functional Assessment Measure. , 1993 .

[29]  M A Foulkes,et al.  The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography. , 1992, Journal of neurotrauma.

[30]  E. Bigler,et al.  Neuroimaging of anoxic injury: implications for neurorehabilitation. , 2012, NeuroRehabilitation.

[31]  R. Alday,et al.  Sequential computerized tomography changes and related final outcome in severe head injury patients , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[32]  Juan Lu,et al.  Edinburgh Research Explorer Prediction of outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury , 2022 .