Resisting Diversity: a Long-Term Archaeological Study

The value of “diversity” in social and ecological systems is frequently asserted in academic and policy literature. Diversity is thought to enhance the resilience of social-ecological systems to varied and potentially uncertain future conditions. Yet there are trade-offs; diversity in ecological and social domains has costs as well as benefits. In this paper, we examine social diversity, specifically its costs and benefits in terms of decision making in middle range or tribal societies, using archaeological evidence spanning seven centuries from four regions of the U.S. Southwest. In these nonstate societies, social diversity may detract from the capacity for collective action. We ask whether as population density increases, making collective action increasingly difficult, social diversity declines. Further, we trace the cases of low diversity and high population density across our long-temporal sequences to see how they associate with the most dramatic transformations. This latter analysis is inspired by the claim in resilience literature that reduction of diversity may contribute to reduction in resilience to varied conditions. Using archaeological data, we examine social diversity and conformity through the material culture (pottery styles) of past societies. Our research contributes to an enhanced understanding of how population density may limit social diversity and suggests the role that this association may play in some contexts of dramatic social transformation.

[1]  S. Plog Analysis of Style in Artifacts , 1983 .

[2]  M. Nelson,et al.  Archaeological and Ecological Perspectives on Reorganization: A Case Study from the Mimbres Region of the U.S. Southwest , 2006, American Antiquity.

[3]  A. Kinzig,et al.  Resilience of past landscapes: Resilience theory, society, and the Longue Durée , 2003 .

[4]  Matthew A. Peeples,et al.  Sustainable Small-Scale Agriculture in Semi-Arid Environments , 2011 .

[5]  Michelle Hegmon,et al.  The Social Dynamics of Pottery Style in the Early Puebloan Southwest , 1995 .

[6]  Brian Walker,et al.  A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems , 2006 .

[7]  A. Kinzig,et al.  Original Articles: Plant Attribute Diversity, Resilience, and Ecosystem Function: The Nature and Significance of Dominant and Minor Species , 1999, Ecosystems.

[8]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Navigating Social–Ecological Systems: Redundancy and diversity: do they influence optimal management? , 2002 .

[9]  P. Wiessner Reconsidering the Behavioral Basis for Style: A Case Study among the Kalahari San , 1984 .

[10]  G. Schachner Population Circulation and the Transformation of Ancient Zuni Communities , 2012 .

[11]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations , 2002, Ambio.

[12]  M. Hegmon,et al.  Archaeological Research on Style , 1992 .

[13]  Gregory A. Johnson Organizational Structure and Scalar Stress , 2003 .

[14]  J. Sackett Approaches to style in lithic archaeology , 1982 .

[15]  P. Wiessner Style and Social Information in Kalahari San Projectile Points , 1983, American Antiquity.

[16]  F. Neiman Stylistic Variation in Evolutionary Perspective: Inferences from Decorative Diversity and Interassemblage Distance in Illinois Woodland Ceramic Assemblages , 1995, American Antiquity.

[17]  John M. Anderies,et al.  The Cross-scale Interplay between Social and Biophysical Context and the Vulnerability of Irrigation-dependent Societies: Archaeology’s Long-term Perspective , 2010 .