Habitat Destruction, Fragmentation, and Disturbance Promote Invasion by Habitat Generalists in a Multispecies Metapopulation

Species invasions are extremely common and are vastly outpacing the ability of resource agencies to address each invasion, one species at a time. Management actions that target the whole landscape or ecosystem may provide more cost-effective protection against the establishment of invasive species than a species-by-species approach. To explore what ecosystem-level actions might effectively reduce invasions, we developed a multispecies, multihabitat metapopulation model. We assume that species that successfully establish themselves outside their native range tend to be habitat generalists and that a tradeoff exists between competitive ability and habitat breadth, such that habitat specialists are competitively superior to habitat generalists. In this model, habitat destruction, fragmentation, and short-term disturbances all favor invasion by habitat generalists, despite the inferior competitive abilities of generalist species. Our model results illustrate that providing relatively undisturbed habitat and preventing further habitat degradation and fragmentation can provide a highly cost-effective defense against invasive species.

[1]  F. D. Panetta,et al.  Predicting the Australian Weed Status of Southern African Plants , 1993 .

[2]  J. R. Griffin,et al.  Introduced and native plants of the hastings reservation, central coastal California : a comparison , 1995 .

[3]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and extinction thresholds on fractal landscapes , 1999 .

[4]  Robert M. May,et al.  Dynamics of metapopulations : habitat destruction and competitive coexistence , 1992 .

[5]  BREAKDOWN IN CORRELATIONS DURING LABORATORY EVOLUTION. II. SELECTION ON STRESS RESISTANCE IN DROSOPHILA POPULATIONS , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  D. Dykhuizen,et al.  An Experimental Model: Bacterial Specialists and Generalists Competing in Chemostats , 1980 .

[7]  Clarence Lehman,et al.  10. Habitat Destruction and Species Extinctions , 1998 .

[8]  S. Stearns Life-History Tactics: A Review of the Ideas , 1976, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[9]  J. Jaenike,et al.  Competitive interactions and persistence of two nematode species that parasitize Drosophila recens , 2001 .

[10]  M. Mckinney Extinction Vulnerability and Selectivity: Combining Ecological and Paleontological Views , 1997 .

[11]  D. Wilcove,et al.  QUANTIFYING THREATS TO IMPERILED SPECIES IN THE UNITED STATES , 1998 .

[12]  S. Sultan Phenotypic plasticity for fitness components in Polygonum species of contrasting ecological breadth , 2001 .

[13]  R. Macarthur Mathematical Ecology and Its Place among the Sciences. (Book Reviews: Geographical Ecology. Patterns in the Distribution of Species) , 1974 .

[14]  Alain J. Crivelli,et al.  Can life‐history traits predict the fate of introduced species? A case study on two cyprinid fish in southern France , 2001 .

[15]  B. A. Hawkins,et al.  Herbivore Responses to Plant Secondary Compounds: A Test of Phytochemical Coevolution Theory , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[16]  H. G. Baker,et al.  The Evolution of Weeds , 1974 .

[17]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  Copepodology for the Onithologist , 1951 .

[18]  John R. Krebs,et al.  Competition and the Structure of Bird Communities , 1975 .

[19]  M. Nowak,et al.  Habitat destruction and the extinction debt , 1994, Nature.

[20]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions , 2001 .

[21]  C. Frissell,et al.  Review of Ecological Effects of Roads on Terrestrial and Aquatic Communities , 2000 .

[22]  Paul L. Angermeier,et al.  Ecological Attributes of Extinction‐Prone Species: Loss of Freshwater Fishes of Virginia , 1995 .

[23]  David Tilman,et al.  Allocation and the transient dynamics of succession on poor soils. , 1990 .

[24]  J. Hallett,et al.  Competition and Habitat Selection: Test of a Theory Using Small Mammals , 1983 .

[25]  G. Kattan Rarity and Vulnerability: The Birds of the Cordillera Central of Colombia , 1992 .

[26]  H. G. Baker,et al.  Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. , 1965 .

[27]  H. Caswell,et al.  ALTERNATIVES TO RESILIENCE FOR MEASURING THE RESPONSES OF ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS TO PERTURBATIONS , 1997 .

[28]  R. Cousens,et al.  Invasiveness and comparative life-history traits of exotic and indigenous Senecio species in Australia , 2000, Oecologia.

[29]  B. J. Goodwin,et al.  Predicting Invasiveness of Plant Species Based on Biological Information , 1999 .

[30]  J. C. Hickman,et al.  The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California , 1993 .

[31]  W. Baker,et al.  Contribution of Roads to Forest Fragmentation in the Rocky Mountains , 1996 .

[32]  J. Guégan,et al.  Experimental evidence of asymmetrical competition between two species of parasitic copepods , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  R. Dueser,et al.  Competition and habitat selection in a forest-floor small mammal fauna , 1980 .

[34]  Sarah H. Reichard,et al.  Predicting Invasions of Woody Plants Introduced into North America , 1997, Conservation Biology.

[35]  D. Richardson,et al.  What attributes make some plant species more invasive , 1996 .

[36]  L. Partridge,et al.  An advantage for specialist feeding in jackdaws, Corvus monedula , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  K. Strickler SPECIALIZATION AND FORAGING EFFICIENCY OF SOLITARY BEES , 1979 .

[38]  Menna E. Jones,et al.  COEXISTENCE OF TEMPORALLY PARTITIONED SPINY MICE: ROLES OF HABITAT STRUCTURE AND FORAGING BEHAVIOR , 2001 .

[39]  Eric R. Pianka,et al.  On r- and K-Selection , 1970, The American Naturalist.