Cost-Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug Eluting Stents Versus Bypass Surgery for Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Results From the FREEDOM Trial

Background— Studies from the balloon angioplasty and bare metal stent eras have demonstrated that coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is cost-effective compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients undergoing multivessel coronary revascularization—particularly among patients with complex coronary artery disease or diabetes mellitus. Whether these results apply in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era is unknown. Methods and Results— Between 2005 and 2010, 1900 patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease were randomized to PCI with DES (DES-PCI; n=953) or CABG (n=947). Costs were assessed from the perspective of the U.S. health care system. Health state utilities were assessed using the EuroQOL 5 dimension 3 level questionnaire. A patient-level microsimulation model based on U.S. life-tables and in-trial results was used to estimate lifetime cost-effectiveness. Although initial procedural costs were lower for CABG, total costs for the index hospitalization were $8622 higher per patient. Over the next 5 years, follow-up costs were higher with PCI, owing to more frequent repeat revascularization and higher outpatient medication costs. Nonetheless, cumulative 5-year costs remained $3641 higher per patient with CABG. Although there were only modest gains in survival with CABG during the trial period, when the in-trial results were extended to a lifetime horizon, CABG was projected to be economically attractive relative to DES-PCI, with substantial gains in both life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios <$10 000 per life-year or quality-adjusted life-year gained across a broad range of assumptions regarding the effect of CABG on post-trial survival and costs. Conclusions— Despite higher initial costs, CABG is a highly cost-effective revascularization strategy compared with DES-PCI for patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinical-trials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00086450.

[1]  C. Cernigliaro [Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease]. , 2001, Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[2]  Stephen Joel Coons,et al.  US Valuation of the EQ-5D Health States: Development and Testing of the D1 Valuation Model , 2005, Medical care.

[3]  P. Serruys,et al.  Clinical and Economic Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Percutaneous and Surgical Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Disease Patients , 2001 .

[4]  M. Shishehbor,et al.  Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes , 2013 .

[5]  J. Madias Bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Michael E. Chernew,et al.  Willingness to Pay for a Quality-adjusted Life Year , 2000, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[7]  Ameet Bakhai,et al.  Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[8]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). , 2004, Circulation.

[9]  F Unger,et al.  Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 1996, JAMA.

[11]  Duane Pinto,et al.  Economic outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug‐eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with left main or three‐vessel coronary artery disease: One‐year results from the SYNTAX trial , 2012, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[12]  Gregg W Stone,et al.  Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  A S Kosinski,et al.  A comparison of the costs of and quality of life after coronary angioplasty or coronary surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease. Results from the Emory Angioplasty Versus Surgery Trial (EAST). , 1995, Circulation.

[14]  Mark A Hlatky,et al.  Medical Costs and Quality of Life 10 to 12 Years After Randomization to Angioplasty or Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease , 2004, Circulation.

[15]  P. Serruys,et al.  Clinical and Economic Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Percutaneous and Surgical Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Disease Patients: Insights From the Arterial Revascularization Therapy Study (ARTS) Trial , 2001, Circulation.

[16]  V. Fuster,et al.  Design of the Future REvascularization Evaluation in patients with Diabetes mellitus: Optimal management of Multivessel disease (FREEDOM) Trial. , 2008, American heart journal.

[17]  Laura Mauri,et al.  2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention , 2013, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[18]  D. Mark,et al.  Medical care costs and quality of life after randomization to coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery. Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Long-term cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel given for up to one year in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  Richard Siegrist,et al.  Comparison of analytic approaches for the economic evaluation of new technologies alongside multicenter clinical trials. , 2003, American heart journal.

[22]  R. Califf,et al.  Coronary revascularization in diabetic patients: a comparison of the randomized and observational components of the Aypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). , 1999, Circulation.

[23]  G. Stone,et al.  Stent thrombosis with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis , 2012, The Lancet.

[24]  J. Willerson Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. , 1996, Circulation.

[25]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  Gregg W. Stone,et al.  A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease , 2004 .

[27]  Robert L. Frye,et al.  Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  M. Flather,et al.  One year comparison of costs of coronary surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in the stent or surgery trial , 2004, Heart.

[29]  Anastasios A. Tsiatis,et al.  Estimating medical costs with censored data , 2000 .

[30]  Jeffrey W Moses,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  P. Serruys,et al.  Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stenting and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis With 5-Year Patient-Level Data From the ARTS, ERACI-II, MASS-II, and SoS Trials , 2008, Circulation.

[32]  W. C. Sheldon,et al.  Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  B. Efron Better Bootstrap Confidence Intervals , 1987 .

[34]  W. Laskey,et al.  Clinical Progression of Incidental, Asymptomatic Lesions Discovered During Culprit Vessel Coronary Intervention , 2005, Circulation.

[35]  G. Angelini,et al.  Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients. 1-year results of the CARDia (Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes) trial. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  James T. Willerson,et al.  Appointment of New Associate Editor for Circulation , 1996 .

[37]  J. Moses,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting stents vs. standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery , 2004 .

[38]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: the final analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS) randomized trial. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[39]  R. Collins,et al.  Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90 056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins , 2005, The Lancet.

[40]  W. Weintraub,et al.  Eight-year mortality in the Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST) , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[41]  M. Gold Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine , 2016 .

[42]  V. Chair,et al.  ACCF/AHA Practice Guideline 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2011 .