Ascertaining the importance of neurons to develop better brain-machine interfaces

In the design of brain-machine interface (BMI) algorithms, the activity of hundreds of chronically recorded neurons is used to reconstruct a variety of kinematic variables. A significant problem introduced with the use of neural ensemble inputs for model building is the explosion in the number of free parameters. Large models not only affect model generalization but also put a computational burden on computing an optimal solution especially when the goal is to implement the BMI in low-power, portable hardware. In this paper, three methods are presented to quantitatively rate the importance of neurons in neural to motor mapping, using single neuron correlation analysis, sensitivity analysis through a vector linear model, and a model-independent cellular directional tuning analysis for comparisons purpose. Although, the rankings are not identical, up to sixty percent of the top 10 ranking cells were in common. This set can then be used to determine a reduced-order model whose performance is similar to that of the ensemble. It is further shown that by pruning the initial ensemble neural input with the ranked importance of cells, a reduced sets of cells (between 40 and 80, depending upon the methods) can be found that exceed the BMI performance levels of the full ensemble.

[1]  Jerald D. Kralik,et al.  Chronic, multisite, multielectrode recordings in macaque monkeys , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Lennart Ljung.  Black-box models from input-output measurements , 2001, IMTC 2001. Proceedings of the 18th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference. Rediscovering Measurement in the Age of Informatics (Cat. No.01CH 37188).

[3]  J. T. Massey,et al.  Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector. , 1989, Science.

[4]  Jerald D. Kralik,et al.  Real-time prediction of hand trajectory by ensembles of cortical neurons in primates , 2000, Nature.

[5]  Michael J. Black,et al.  Inferring Hand Motion from Multi-Cell Recordings in Motor Cortex using a Kalman Filter , 2002 .

[6]  E. Fetz.  Movement control: Are movement parameters recognizably coded in the activity of single neurons? , 1992 .

[7]  T. Ebner,et al.  Temporal encoding of movement kinematics in the discharge of primate primary motor and premotor neurons. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  J.C. Sanchez,et al.  Learning the contributions of the motor, premotor, and posterior parietal cortices for hand trajectory reconstruction in a brain machine interface , 2003, First International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2003. Conference Proceedings..

[9]  Michael J. Black,et al.  A quantitative comparison of linear and non-linear models of motor cortical activity for the encoding and decoding of arm motions , 2003, First International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2003. Conference Proceedings..

[10]  Dawn M. Taylor,et al.  Direct Cortical Control of 3D Neuroprosthetic Devices , 2002, Science.

[11]  G. Wahba.  Spline models for observational data , 1990 .

[12]  Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos,et al.  Brain-machine interface: Instant neural control of a movement signal , 2002, Nature.

[13]  A P Georgopoulos,et al.  On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  S. R. Jammalamadaka,et al.  Topics in Circular Statistics , 2001 .

[15]  Elie Bienenstock,et al.  Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma , 1992, Neural Computation.

[16]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[17]  A B Schwartz,et al.  Motor cortical representation of speed and direction during reaching. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Deniz Erdogmus,et al.  Interpreting neural activity through linear and nonlinear models for brain machine interfaces , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[19]  P R Kennedy,et al.  Direct control of a computer from the human central nervous system. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction. , 1986, Science.

[21]  Deniz Erdogmus,et al.  Divide-and-conquer approach for brain machine interfaces: nonlinear mixture of competitive linear models , 2003, Neural Networks.

[22]  David M. Santucci,et al.  Learning to Control a Brain–Machine Interface for Reaching and Grasping by Primates , 2003, PLoS biology.

[23]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Adaptive filter theory (2nd ed.) , 1991 .

[24]  Deniz Erdogmus,et al.  Input-output mapping performance of linear and nonlinear models for estimating hand trajectories from cortical neuronal firing patterns , 2002, Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing.

[25]  S. Haykin,et al.  Adaptive Filter Theory , 1986 .

[26]  A. Schwartz,et al.  Motor cortical activity during drawing movements: population representation during lemniscate tracing. , 1999 .

[27]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Real-time control of a robot arm using simultaneously recorded neurons in the motor cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Dawn M. Taylor,et al.  Extraction algorithms for cortical control of arm prosthetics , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[29]  Deniz Erdogmus,et al.  A Comparison between Nonlinear Mappings and Linear State Estimation to Model the Relation from Motor Cortical Neuronal Firing to Hand Movements , 2002 .

[30]  A. Schwartz,et al.  Motor cortical activity during drawing movements: population representation during spiral tracing. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.