MR-Guided Kernel EM Reconstruction for Reduced Dose PET Imaging

Positron emission tomography (PET) image reconstruction is highly susceptible to the impact of Poisson noise, and if shorter acquisition times or reduced injected doses are used, the noisy PET data become even more limiting. The recent development of kernel expectation maximization is a simple way to reduce noise in PET images, and we show in this paper that impressive dose reduction can be achieved when the kernel method is used with MR-derived kernels. The kernel method is shown to surpass maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) for the reconstruction of low-count datasets (corresponding to those obtained at reduced injected doses) producing visibly clearer reconstructions for unsmoothed and smoothed images, at all count levels. The kernel EM reconstruction of 10% of the data had comparable whole brain voxel-level error measures to the MLEM reconstruction of 100% of the data (for simulated data, at 100 iterations). For regional metrics, the kernel method at reduced dose levels attained a reduced coefficient of variation and more accurate mean values compared to MLEM. However, the advances provided by the kernel method are at the expense of possible over-smoothing of features unique to the PET data. Further assessment on clinical data is required to determine the level of dose reduction that can be routinely achieved using the kernel method, whilst maintaining the diagnostic utility of the scan.

[1]  Jieqing Jiao,et al.  Detail-Preserving PET Reconstruction with Sparse Image Representation and Anatomical Priors , 2015, IPMI.

[2]  Arman Rahmim,et al.  Bayesian PET image reconstruction incorporating anato-functional joint entropy , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[3]  R. Leahy,et al.  Magnetic resonance-guided positron emission tomography image reconstruction. , 2013, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[4]  J. Bowsher,et al.  Utilizing MRI information to estimate F18-FDG distributions in rat flank tumors , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[5]  Shuhang Chen,et al.  Sparse representation and dictionary learning penalized image reconstruction for positron emission tomography , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  David Atkinson,et al.  Joint reconstruction of PET-MRI by exploiting structural similarity , 2014, Inverse Problems.

[7]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  BrainWeb: Online Interface to a 3D MRI Simulated Brain Database , 1997 .

[8]  Michael Elad,et al.  Analysis versus synthesis in signal priors , 2006, 2006 14th European Signal Processing Conference.

[9]  E U Mumcuoğlu,et al.  Bayesian reconstruction of PET images: methodology and performance analysis. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Andrew J Reader,et al.  Patch-based image reconstruction for PET using prior-image derived dictionaries , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  G. Delso,et al.  Performance Measurements of the Siemens mMR Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Scanner , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Yue Zhao,et al.  Anatomical image-guided fluorescence molecular tomography reconstruction using kernel method , 2017, Journal of biomedical optics.

[13]  Philip Novosad,et al.  MR-guided dynamic PET reconstruction with the kernel method and spectral temporal basis functions , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Dynamic PET Image reconstruction for parametric imaging using the HYPR kernel method , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[15]  Alexander Hammers,et al.  PET image reconstruction using multi-parametric anato-functional priors , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  P. Green On Use of the EM Algorithm for Penalized Likelihood Estimation , 1990 .

[17]  K. Herholz,et al.  The effect of 18F-florbetapir dose reduction on region-based classification of cortical amyloid deposition , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Simulation of Tracer Dose Reduction in 18F-FDG PET/MRI: Effects on Oncologic Reading, Image Quality, and Artifacts , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Guobao Wang,et al.  PET Image Reconstruction Using Kernel Method , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Anatomically-aided PET reconstruction using the kernel method , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  T. Hebert,et al.  A generalized EM algorithm for 3-D Bayesian reconstruction from Poisson data using Gibbs priors. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[23]  Maurizio Conti,et al.  Quantitative Accuracy and Lesion Detectability of Low-Dose 18F-FDG PET for Lung Cancer Screening , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  Yue Zhao,et al.  Application of kernel method in fluorescence molecular tomography , 2017, BiOS.

[25]  Leslie Ying,et al.  Sparsity-based PET image reconstruction using MRI learned dictionaries , 2014, 2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[26]  J. Nuyts The use of mutual information and joint entropy for anatomical priors in emission tomography , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[27]  Anthonin Reilhac,et al.  Evaluation of Three MRI-Based Anatomical Priors for Quantitative PET Brain Imaging , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  P. Goa,et al.  Quantitative comparison of PET performance—Siemens Biograph mCT and mMR , 2016, EJNMMI Physics.

[29]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Direct Parametric Reconstruction Using Anatomical Regularization for Simultaneous PET/MRI Data , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  P. Green Bayesian reconstructions from emission tomography data using a modified EM algorithm. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[31]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Kernel-based anatomically-aided diffuse optical tomography reconstruction , 2017, BiOS.