Performance tests of large area position-sensitive planar germanium detectors with conventional and amorphous contacts

Abstract Large area position-sensitive planar germanium wafers are increasingly being used for a variety of gamma-ray imaging and tracking tasks. Position sensitivity can be achieved through measuring charge collected on orthogonal strip electrodes, and by digital pulse shape analysis. However, the development of this detector technology has been slow, and criteria to measure improved performance have not been well established. We have studied 93 and 88 mm square segmented detectors of 20 mm thickness made with conventional boron and lithium electrodes, and two 100 mm circular segmented detectors of 14 mm thickness with amorphous germanium contacts. We have compared these detectors with a planar detector of 15 mm thickness. Conventional energy resolution tests of individual strips are insufficient to fully categorize the performance of the position sensitive detectors. We propose some basic tests which can rapidly quantify any segmented detector characteristics, and show potential inadequacies which become important when imaging or tracking is attempted.

[1]  David K. Wehe,et al.  Optimization And Angular Resolution Calculations For A Multiple Compton Scatter Camera , 1993, 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[2]  K. Vetter,et al.  Gamma-ray imaging with position-sensitive HPGe detectors , 2004 .

[3]  M. Amman,et al.  Three-dimensional position sensing and field shaping in orthogonal-strip germanium gamma-ray detectors. , 2000 .

[4]  William A. Wulf,et al.  Three-Compton telescope: theory, simulations, and performance , 2001 .

[5]  William K. Warburton,et al.  Position resolution in a Ge-strip detector , 1999, Optics & Photonics.

[6]  D. Appelbe,et al.  The GREAT spectrometer , 2003 .

[7]  M. McConnell,et al.  Instrument description and performance of the Imaging Gamma-Ray Telescope COMPTEL aboard the Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory , 1993 .

[8]  David K. Wehe,et al.  Observation of charge-sharing in an HPGe double-sided strip detector , 2007 .

[9]  C. S. Lee,et al.  Polarization sensitivity and efficiency for a planar-type segmented germanium detector as a Compton polarimeter , 2003 .

[10]  Paul N. Luke,et al.  Amorphous-semiconductor-contact germanium-based detectors for gamma-ray imaging and spectroscopy ☆ , 2007 .

[11]  Incomplete charge collection in an HPGe double-sided strip detector , 2008 .

[12]  J. Cresswell,et al.  Orthogonal Strip HPGe Planar SmartPET Detectors in Compton Configuration , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[13]  D. Appelbe,et al.  GEANT Monte Carlo simulations for the GREAT spectrometer , 2004 .

[14]  K. Vetter,et al.  High-sensitivity Compton imaging with position-sensitive Si and Ge detectors , 2006 .

[15]  Kai Vetter,et al.  In-beam measurement of the position resolution of a highly segmented coaxial germanium detector , 2005 .

[16]  John E. Gillam,et al.  SmartPET: Applying HPGe and pulse shape analysis to small-animal PET , 2007 .

[17]  John E. Gillam,et al.  Characterisation of the SmartPET planar Germanium detectors , 2007 .

[18]  R. D. Evans,et al.  Atomic Nucleus , 2020, Definitions.

[19]  P. Nolan,et al.  Characterisation of an AGATA symmetric prototype detector , 2007 .

[20]  R. Pehl,et al.  Amorphous germanium contacts on germanium detectors , 2005 .

[21]  K. Vetter,et al.  Three-dimensional position sensitivity in two-dimensionally segmented HP-Ge detectors , 2000 .

[22]  O. Klein,et al.  Über die Streuung von Strahlung durch freie Elektronen nach der neuen relativistischen Quantendynamik von Dirac , 1929 .

[23]  S. E. Boggs,et al.  Event reconstruction in high resolution Compton telescopes , 2000 .

[24]  S. Shimoura Position sensitivity of Ge detectors and its applications to in-beam nuclear spectroscopy , 2004 .

[25]  Wayne Coburn,et al.  Overview of the nuclear Compton telescope , 2004 .

[26]  William W. Craig,et al.  SPEIR: A Ge Compton camera , 2004 .