Relationships among objective and subjective risk for breast cancer and mammography stages of change.

This study examined the relationships among objective and subjective risk for breast cancer and mammography stages of change as defined by the Transtheoretical Model. Women who had higher objective risk of breast cancer, as defined by the Gail et al. algorithm (M. H. Gail et al., J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 81: 1879-1886, 1989), were more likely to perceive themselves at greater subjective risk for breast cancer. Among the components of objective risk, family history of breast cancer was the only significant predictor of subjective risk. Both objective and subjective risk individually predicted stages of change, such that higher objective and subjective risk were associated with an increased probability of being in a later stage of adopting mammography. However, when objective and subjective risk were included in a multivariate model, only subjective risk predicted stages of change. In additional multivariate analyses, subjective risk continued to predict mammography stages of change when "con" and "decisional balance" scores were included in separate models. These results suggest that future research may benefit from the explicit integration of personal risk perceptions with elements of the Transtheoretical Model to provide more powerful accounts of behavioral change processes.

[1]  V. Strecher,et al.  Do tailored behavior change messages enhance the effectiveness of health risk appraisal? Results from a randomized trial. , 1996, Health education research.

[2]  D. Gold,et al.  Osteoporosis prevention in premenopausal women: using a stage model approach to examine the predictors of behavior. , 1996, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[3]  B. Rimer,et al.  Awareness of heightened breast cancer risk among first-degree relatives of recently diagnosed breast cancer patients. The High Risk Breast Cancer Consortium. , 1995, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[4]  R F Nease,et al.  Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  B. Rimer,et al.  Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  J P Fulton,et al.  Women's decision making about mammography: a replication of the relationship between stages of adoption and decisional balance. , 1993, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[7]  J. Prochaska,et al.  In Search of How People Change: Applications to Addictive Behaviors , 1992, The American psychologist.

[8]  M. Gail,et al.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. , 1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  M. Becker,et al.  The Health Belief Model: A Decade Later , 1984, Health education quarterly.

[10]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[11]  Suzanne M. Miller,et al.  Applying cognitive-social theory to health-protective behavior: breast self-examination in cancer screening. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  B. Rimer,et al.  Predictors of adoption of mammography in women under age 50. , 1995, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[13]  S. West,et al.  Perceived determinants of risk for breast cancer and the relations among objective risk, perceived risk, and screening behavior over time. , 1995, Women's health.

[14]  V. Strecher,et al.  Changing inaccurate perceptions of health risk: results from a randomized trial. , 1995, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[15]  K. Emmons,et al.  Theoretical Models for Predicting and Improving Compliance with Breast Cancer Screening , 1994, Annals of Behavioral Medicine.

[16]  W. Rakowski,et al.  Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. , 1994, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[17]  P M Sandman,et al.  A model of the precaution adoption process: evidence from home radon testing. , 1992, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[18]  W. Rakowski,et al.  Assessing elements of women's decisions about mammography. , 1992, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[19]  W Sumner,et al.  U-titer: a utility assessment tool. , 1991, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[20]  J. Krischer,et al.  Identification and screening of women at high risk of breast cancer. , 1988, Cancer detection and prevention.

[21]  N. Weinstein The precaution adoption process. , 1988, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[22]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  N D Weinstein,et al.  Why it won't happen to me: perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility. , 1984, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.