High concordance between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization testing for HER2 status in breast cancer requires a normalized IHC scoring system

The American Society of Clinical Oncologists and College of American Pathologists have recently released new guidelines for laboratory testing of HER2 status in breast cancer, which require high levels (95%) of concordance between immunohistochemistry positive (3+) and fluorescence in situ hybridization-amplified cases, and between immunohistochemistry negative (0/1+) and fluorescence in situ hybridization-nonamplified cases; these required levels of concordance are significantly higher than those found in most published studies. We tested the hypothesis that a modification of the HER2 immunohistochemistry scoring system could significantly improve immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization concordance. A total of 6604 breast cancer specimens were evaluated for HER2 status by both immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization using standard methodologies. Results were compared when the standard immunohistochemistry scoring system was replaced by a normalized scoring system in which the HER2 score was derived by subtracting the score on the non-neoplastic breast epithelium from that on the tumor cells. Among the 6604 tumors, using a non-normalized immunohistochemistry scoring system, 267/872 (30.6%) of the immunohistochemistry 3+ cases proved to be fluorescence in situ hybridization nonamplified, whereas using the normalized scoring system only 30/562 (5.3%) of immunohistochemistry 3+ cases proved to be ‘false positive’. The concordance rate between immunohistochemistry 3+ and fluorescence in situ hybridization-amplified cases using the normalized scoring method was 94.7%, whereas the concordance using the non-normalized method was only 69.4%. Extremely high concordance between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer is achievable, but to attain this high level of concordance, modification of the FDA-approved immunohistochemistry scoring system is required.

[1]  S. Kakar,et al.  HER-2/neu assessment in breast cancer by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization: comparison of results and correlation with survival. , 2000 .

[2]  L. Huo HER2 Testing by Local, Central, and Reference Laboratories in Specimens From the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 Intergroup Adjuvant Trial , 2007 .

[3]  S. Ménard,et al.  Response to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in lymph node-positive breast cancer according to HER2 overexpression and other tumor biologic variables. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  S J Schnitt,et al.  Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry for the evaluation of HER-2/neu in breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Jinha M. Park,et al.  Evaluation of HER-2/neu gene amplification and overexpression: comparison of frequently used assay methods in a molecularly characterized cohort of breast cancer specimens. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Strong Correlation between Results of Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry for the Assessment of the ERBB2 (HER-2/neu) Gene Status in Breast Carcinoma , 2000, Modern Pathology.

[7]  Peter A Kaufman,et al.  Concordance between local and central laboratory HER2 testing in the breast intergroup trial N9831. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  Greg Yothers,et al.  Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  M. Berger,et al.  Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[11]  K. Bloom,et al.  Enhanced accuracy and reliability of HER-2/neu immunohistochemical scoring using digital microscopy. , 2004, American journal of clinical pathology.

[12]  P. Klein,et al.  Concordance between central and local laboratory HER2 testing from a community-based clinical study. , 2006, Clinical breast cancer.

[13]  M. Untch,et al.  Her-2/neu analysis in archival tissue samples of human breast cancer: comparison of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  P. Thomas,et al.  Comparison of immunohistochemistry by automated cellular imaging system (ACIS) versus fluorescence in‐situ hybridization in the evaluation of HER‐2/neu expression in primary breast carcinoma , 2006, Histopathology.

[15]  N. Robert,et al.  Multinational study of the efficacy and safety of humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in women who have HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after chemotherapy for metastatic disease. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Paul W. Thurman,et al.  No rational theory for drug pricing. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  L. Goldstein,et al.  HER-2 testing in breast cancer using parallel tissue-based methods. , 2004, JAMA.

[18]  Determination of HER-2 status and chromosome 17 polysomy in breast carcinomas comparing HercepTest and PathVysion FISH assay. , 2004, American journal of clinical pathology.

[19]  D. Slamon,et al.  Assessment of methods for tissue-based detection of the HER-2/neu alteration in human breast cancer: a direct comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  D. Slamon,et al.  Sensitivity of HER-2/neu antibodies in archival tissue samples: potential source of error in immunohistochemical studies of oncogene expression. , 1994, Cancer research.

[21]  M. Ladanyi,et al.  Impact of polysomy 17 on HER-2/neu immunohistochemistry in breast carcinomas without HER-2/neu gene amplification. , 2003, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[22]  K. Gelmon,et al.  Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of trastuzumab administered every three weeks in combination with paclitaxel. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  W Godolphin,et al.  Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. , 1989, Science.

[24]  D. Slamon,et al.  Rationale for trastuzumab (Herceptin) in adjuvant breast cancer trials. , 2001, Seminars in oncology.

[25]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  J. Ingle,et al.  Increased HER2 with U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved antibody. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  D A Berry,et al.  erbB-2, p53, and efficacy of adjuvant therapy in lymph node-positive breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[28]  Jinha M. Park,et al.  Diagnostic Evaluation of HER-2 as a Molecular Target: An Assessment of Accuracy and Reproducibility of Laboratory Testing in Large, Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trials , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[29]  A. Leong,et al.  Refinement of Immunohistologic Parameters for Her2/neu Scoring Validation by FISH and CISH , 2006, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[30]  C. Sotiriou,et al.  Polysomy 17 in HER-2/neu Status Elaboration in Breast Cancer: Effect on Daily Practice , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[31]  P. Malmström,et al.  TOP2A and HER2 gene amplification as predictors of response to anthracycline treatment in breast cancer , 2006, Acta oncologica.

[32]  Lyndsay N Harris,et al.  Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  D. Camidge,et al.  Dynamic and modern: bringing the ethics of phase I trials up to date. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  Greg Yothers,et al.  Real-world performance of HER2 testing--National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project experience. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[35]  M. Owens,et al.  HER2 amplification ratios by fluorescence in situ hybridization and correlation with immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 6556 breast cancer tissues. , 2004, Clinical breast cancer.

[36]  M. Weinstein,et al.  HER-2 testing and trastuzumab therapy for metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  Irene L Andrulis,et al.  HER2 and responsiveness of breast cancer to adjuvant chemotherapy. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  G. Tortora,et al.  A Meta-Analysis on the Interaction between HER-2 Expression and Response to Endocrine Treatment in Advanced Breast Cancer , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[39]  D. Slamon,et al.  Detection and quantitation of HER-2/neu gene amplification in human breast cancer archival material using fluorescence in situ hybridization. , 1996, Oncogene.

[40]  M. Press,et al.  Determination of HER2 Gene Amplification by Fluorescence In situ Hybridization and Concordance with the Clinical Trials Immunohistochemical Assay in Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer Evaluated for Treatment with Trastuzumab , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[41]  C. Sotiriou,et al.  Correlation between complete response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy and topoisomerase II-alpha gene amplification and protein overexpression in locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer. , 2004, International journal of oncology.

[42]  M. Ladanyi,et al.  HER-2 testing in breast cancer using immunohistochemical analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization: a single-institution experience of 2,279 cases and comparison of dual-color and single-color scoring. , 2004, American journal of clinical pathology.

[43]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Calibration of immunohistochemistry for assessment of HER2 in breast cancer: results of the French Multicentre GEFPICS * Study , 2003, Histopathology.

[44]  D. Birnbaum,et al.  Optimization of immunohistochemical detection of ERBB2 in human breast cancer: Impact of fixation , 1994, The Journal of pathology.

[45]  J. Baselga,et al.  Phase II study of efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of trastuzumab monotherapy administered on a 3-weekly schedule. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[46]  A. Gown,et al.  Specificity of HercepTest in determining HER-2/neu status of breast cancers using the United States Food and Drug Administration-approved scoring system. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.