Evaluation of User Acceptance of Virtual Environments and Interfaces for Communication in Virtual Teams

Several studies have highlighted the relevance of face-to-face communication, suggesting that computer-mediated communication can lead to decreases in group effectiveness and reduce satisfaction levels in terms of trust and comfort of its users. Supported by an experiment where the emotional or affective aspects of communication were tested, this paper validates the thesis that, from the users' perspective, there is no opposition to the acceptance of virtual environments and interfaces for communication, and that these environments are able to cope with the reconfiguration dynamics requirements of virtual teams or client-server relations in a virtual enterprise operation. For the thesis validation, the authors experimented with two architectures, the Direct Communication Architecture DCA and the Virtual Communication Architecture VCA and found that the VCA could represent a "natural" environment to cope with the new generation of organizational environments and teams, characterised by intense reconfiguration dynamics.

[1]  Maria Manuela Cunha,et al.  Market of Resources as an Environment for Agile/Virtual Enterprise Dynamic Integration and for Business Alignment , 2003 .

[2]  P. Dasgupta Trust as a commodity , 1988 .

[3]  D. Gefen,et al.  E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust , 2000 .

[4]  Maria Manuela Cunha,et al.  Virtual environments for dynamically reconfigurable Concurrent/Collaborative Engineering ''virtual'' teams , 2008 .

[5]  David R. Traum,et al.  Cooperation, dialogue and ethics , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Maria Manuela Cunha,et al.  Dashboard Services for Pragmatics-Based Interoperability in Cloud and Ubiquitous Manufacturing , 2014, Int. J. Web Portals.

[7]  Jirí Vokrínek,et al.  Support for virtual organisation creation - partners' profiles and competency management , 2009, Int. J. Agent Oriented Softw. Eng..

[8]  Jill M. Purdy,et al.  THE IMPACT OF COMMUNICATION MEDIA ON NEGOTIATION OUTCOMES , 2000 .

[9]  Rachel Croson,et al.  Look at Me When You Say That: An Electronic Negotiation Simulation , 1999 .

[10]  Michaela Koller Risk as a Determinant of Trust , 1988 .

[11]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Penelope Sue Greenberg,et al.  Creating and Sustaining Trust in Virtual Teams , 2007 .

[13]  Irina Verenikina,et al.  Tool Based Psychology as a Philosophy of Technology , 1998, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Goran D. Putnik,et al.  An exploration of the integrative function of dialogue in manufacturing , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[15]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Technology, Group Process, and Group Outcomes: Testing the Connections in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Groups , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  Lisanne Bainbridge,et al.  Ironies of automation , 1982, Autom..

[17]  J. Walther Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[18]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[19]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[20]  Jennifer Chu-Carroll,et al.  Conflict resolution in collaborative planning dialogs , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  Annette N. Shelby,et al.  Organizational, Business, Management, and Corporate Communication: An Analysis of Boundaries and Relationships , 1993 .

[22]  A. Boonstra,et al.  Information system conflicts: causes and types , 2022, International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management.

[23]  Maria Manuela Cunha,et al.  Web-based Technologies Integration for Distributed Manufacturing Scheduling in a Virtual Enterprise , 2012, Int. J. Web Portals.

[24]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams , 2006 .

[25]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System* , 1997 .

[26]  Maria Manuela Cunha,et al.  Discussion on Requirements for Agile/Virtual Enterprises Reconfigurability Dynamics: The Example of the Automotive Industry , 2002, PRO-VE.

[27]  B. Baltes,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis , 2002 .

[28]  E. Ramsey,et al.  Trust considerations on attitudes towards online purchasing: The moderating effect of privacy and security concerns , 2010 .

[29]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Models of attention in computing and communication , 2003, Commun. ACM.

[30]  Murrey Olmsted,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Focus Groups , 2003 .

[31]  Jr. Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Performance and the Use of an Information System , 1975 .

[32]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems , 2006, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[33]  Chyuan Perng,et al.  A strategic framework for website evaluation based on a review of the literature from 1995-2006 , 2010, Inf. Manag..

[34]  Awie Leonard,et al.  Social relationships in IT project teams: its role, complexity and the management thereof , 2022, International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management.

[35]  Soon Jae Kwon,et al.  Effect of trust level on mobile banking satisfaction: a multi-group analysis of information system success instruments , 2009, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[36]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Presence and performance within virtual environments , 1995 .

[37]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[39]  Venkatesh Shankar,et al.  Online trust: a stakeholder perspective, concepts, implications, and future directions , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Shu Z. Schiller,et al.  Virtual Team Research , 2007 .

[42]  Ulla K. Bunz,et al.  The rules of virtual groups: Trust, liking, and performance in computer-mediated communication , 2005 .

[43]  Sakgasit Ramingwong,et al.  A tale behind Mum Effect , 2013 .

[44]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement , 1974 .

[45]  Bolanle A. Olaniran,et al.  Group Performance in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Communication Media , 1994 .

[46]  Hans Weigand,et al.  B2B Negotiation Support: The Need for a Communication Perspective , 2003 .

[47]  Katherine J. Stewart,et al.  Special Issue: Trust in an Organizational Context: Trust Transfer on the World Wide Web , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[48]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Identification in Face-to-Face, Hybrid, and Pure Virtual Teams: Untangling the Contradictions , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[49]  Suzanne P. Weisband,et al.  Evaluating self and others in electronic and face-to-face groups. , 1999 .

[50]  Thea van der Geest,et al.  User-centered evaluation of adaptive and adaptable systems: a literature review , 2008, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[51]  Joy A. Frechtling,et al.  Characteristics of the Discussion in Online and Face-to-Face Focus Groups , 2002 .

[52]  Holger Luczak,et al.  Teams without trust? Investigations in the influence of video-mediated communication on the origin of trust among cooperating persons , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[53]  Jean Carletta,et al.  Virtual team meetings: An analysis of communication and context , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[54]  Mahesh S. Raisinghani,et al.  An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[55]  C. Cherry,et al.  On Human Communication: A Review, a Survey, and a Criticism , 1959 .

[56]  Ming-Chuan Leu,et al.  A Web-based Intelligent Collaborative System for Engineering Design , 2007 .

[57]  Yuh-Min Chen,et al.  Enabling collaborative product design through distributed engineering knowledge management , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[58]  Wai Ming Cheung,et al.  A Novel Knowledge Management Methodology To Support Collaborative Product Development , 2007 .

[59]  Mohsen Sadeghi,et al.  Toward a Framework for Effective Collaborative Product Development , 2007 .

[60]  Shirley S. Ho,et al.  Social-Psychological Influences on Opinion Expression in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communication , 2008, Commun. Res..

[61]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  A Theoretical Perspective of Negotiation Support Systems , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[62]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology , 1997 .

[63]  Na Li,et al.  An assessment of human-computer interaction research in management information systems: topics and methods , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[64]  David Benyon,et al.  Applying user modeling to human-computer interaction design , 1993, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[65]  Mara Olekalns Negotiation as Social Interaction , 2002 .

[66]  Gregory E. Truman,et al.  Behaviour modelling, instruction and exploration training approaches in group and individual contexts , 2009, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[67]  Olga Stawnicza,et al.  Distributed team cohesion – not an oxymoron. The impact of information and communications technologies on teamness in globally distributed IT projects , 2022, International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management.

[68]  F. Dwyer,et al.  Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships: , 1987 .

[69]  Ardion Beldad,et al.  How shall I trust the faceless and the intangible? A literature review on the antecedents of online trust , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[70]  Seung-hee Lee,et al.  An examination of the relationship among structure, trust, and conflict management styles in virtual teams , 2007 .

[71]  S. McComb,et al.  Team Decision Making in Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: How Initial Computer-Mediated or Face-to-Face Meetings Set the Stage for Later Outcomes , 2010, Decis. Sci..

[72]  John Lim,et al.  Exploring computer-based multilingual negotiation support for English – Chinese dyads: can we negotiate in our native languages? , 2008, Behav. Inf. Technol..