A Value-Driven Eldercare Robot: Virtual and Physical Instantiations of a Case-Supported Principle-Based Behavior Paradigm

In this paper, a case-supported principle-based behavior paradigm is proposed to help ensure ethical behavior of autonomous machines. We argue that ethically significant behavior of autonomous systems should be guided by explicit ethical principles determined through a consensus of ethicists. Such a consensus is likely to emerge in many areas in which autonomous systems are apt to be deployed and for the actions they are liable to undertake. We believe that this is the case since we are more likely to agree on how machines ought to treat us than on how human beings ought to treat one another. Given such a consensus, particular cases of ethical dilemmas where ethicists agree on the ethically relevant features and the right course of action can be used to help discover principles that balance these features when they are in conflict. Such principles not only help ensure ethical behavior of complex and dynamic systems but also can serve as a basis for justification of this behavior. The requirements, methods, implementation, and evaluation components of the paradigm are detailed as well as its instantiation in both a simulated and real robot functioning in the domain of eldercare.

[1]  Colin Allen,et al.  Prolegomena to any future artificial moral agent , 2000, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[2]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Governing lethal behavior: Embedding ethics in a hybrid deliberative/reactive robot architecture part I: Motivation and philosophy , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[3]  Marcello Guarini,et al.  Particularism and the Classification and Reclassification of Moral Cases , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[4]  Michael L. Littman,et al.  Reinforcement Learning as a Framework for Ethical Decision Making , 2016, AAAI Workshop: AI, Ethics, and Society.

[5]  Alan F. T. Winfield,et al.  An architecture for ethical robots , 2016, ArXiv.

[6]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  Emotionally Assisted Human–Robot Interaction Using a Wearable Device for Reading Facial Expressions , 2012, Adv. Robotics.

[7]  Bruce M. McLaren,et al.  Extensionally defining principles and cases in ethics: An AI model , 2003, Artif. Intell..

[8]  Stefan Schaal,et al.  The Playful Software Platform: Reactive Programming for Orchestrating Robotic Behavior , 2018, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[9]  Selmer Bringsjord,et al.  Toward a General Logicist Methodology for Engineering Ethically Correct Robots , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[10]  Christopher Grau,et al.  There Is No "I" in "Robot": Robots and Utilitarianism , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[11]  Thomas M. Powers.  Prospects for a Kantian Machine , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[12]  Vincent Berenz,et al.  A Value Driven Agent: Instantiation of a Case-Supported Principle-Based Behavior Paradigm , 2017, AAAI Workshops.

[13]  T. Beauchamp,et al.  Principles of biomedical ethics , 1991 .

[14]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Robotic Systems Architectures and Programming , 2008, Springer Handbook of Robotics.

[15]  A. F. Umar Khan,et al.  The ethics of autonomous learning systems , 1995 .

[16]  Susan Leigh Anderson,et al.  Robot be good. , 2010, Scientific American.

[17]  Konrad Rudin,et al.  Introduction to the Use of Robotic Tools for Search and Rescue , 2017 .

[18]  Michael Anderson,et al.  Machine Ethics: Creating an Ethical Intelligent Agent , 2007, AI Mag..

[19]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[20]  D. Luxton.  Artificial intelligence in behavioral and mental health care , 2016 .

[21]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  Targets-Drives-Means: A declarative approach to dynamic behavior specification with higher usability , 2014, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[22]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  TDM: A software framework for elegant and rapid development of autonomous behaviors for humanoid robots , 2011, 2011 11th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[23]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Human-Like Morality and Ethics for Robots , 2016, AAAI Workshop: AI, Ethics, and Society.

[24]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  Induction of Decision Trees , 1986, Machine Learning.

[25]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  Usability benchmarks of the Targets-Drives-Means robotic architecture , 2012, 2012 12th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2012).

[26]  Michael Anderson,et al.  GenEth: a general ethical dilemma analyzer , 2014, AAAI.

[27]  J. Gips.  Towards the ethical robot , 1995 .

[28]  Kenji Araki,et al.  What Statistics Could Do for Ethics? : The Idea of Common Sense Processing Based Safety Valve , 2005, AAAI 2005.

[29]  Michael Anderson,et al.  Toward ensuring ethical behavior from autonomous systems: a case-supported principle-based paradigm , 2015, Ind. Robot.

[30]  Luís Moniz Pereira,et al.  Modelling morality with prospective logic , 2007, Int. J. Reason. based Intell. Syst..