Evaluation of a fast method of EPID‐based dosimetry for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy

Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) could potentially be useful for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) QA. The data density, high resolution, large active area, and efficiency of the MV EPID make it an attractive option. However, EPIDs were designed as imaging devices, not dosimeters, and as a result they do not inherently measure dose in tissue equivalent media. EPIDose (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL) is a tool designed for the use of EPIDs in IMRT QA that uses raw MV EPID images (no additional build‐up and independent of gantry angle, but with dark and flood field corrections applied) to estimate absolute dose planes normal to the beam axis in a homogeneous media (i.e. similar to conventional IMRT QA methods). However, because of the inherent challenges of the EPID‐based dosimetry, validating and commissioning such a system must be done very carefully, by exploring the range of use cases and using well‐proven “standards” for comparison. In this work, a multi‐institutional study was performed to verify accurate EPID image to dose plane conversion over a variety of conditions. Converted EPID images were compared to 2D diode array absolute dose measurements for 188 fields from 28 clinical IMRT treatment plans. These plans were generated using a number of commercially available treatment planning systems (TPS) covering various treatment sites including prostate, head and neck, brain, and lung. The data included three beam energies (6, 10, and 15 MV) and both step‐and‐shoot and dynamic MLC fields. Out of 26,207 points of comparison over 188 fields analyzed, the average overall field pass rate was 99.7% when 3 mm/3% DTA criteria were used (range 94.0–100 per field). The pass rates for more stringent criteria were 97.8% for 2 mm/2% DTA (range 82.0–100 per field), and 84.6% for 1 mm/1% DTA (range 54.7–100 per field). Individual patient‐specific sites as well, as different beam energies, followed similar trends to the overall pass rates. PACS number: 87.53.Dq; 87.66.Jj

[1]  Portal dose image prediction for in vivo treatment verification completely based on EPID measurements. , 2009, Medical physics.

[2]  Vladimir Feygelman,et al.  Evaluation of a biplanar diode array dosimeter for quality assurance of step‐and‐shoot IMRT , 2009, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[3]  P Xia,et al.  Comparison of treatment plans involving intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  P. Greer,et al.  A simple approach to using an amorphous silicon EPID to verify IMRT planar dose maps. , 2009, Medical physics.

[5]  Gorgen Nilsson,et al.  Characterization and clinical evaluation of a novel IMRT quality assurance system , 2009, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[6]  R Mohan,et al.  The potential for sparing of parotids and escalation of biologically effective dose with intensity-modulated radiation treatments of head and neck cancers: a treatment design study. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  P. Jursinic,et al.  A 2-D diode array and analysis software for verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery. , 2003, Medical physics.

[8]  B G Fallone,et al.  Dosimetric IMRT verification with a flat-panel EPID. , 2003, Medical physics.

[9]  Comparison of two commercial detector arrays for IMRT quality assurance. , 2007, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[10]  Benjamin E Nelms,et al.  On the dose to a moving target while employing different IMRT delivery mechanisms. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  M. Oldham,et al.  Evaluation of a 2D diode array for IMRT quality assurance. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  Clive Baldock,et al.  The impact of MLC transmitted radiation on EPID dosimetry for dynamic MLC beams. , 2008, Medical physics.

[13]  Dietrich Harder,et al.  Spatial resolution of 2D ionization chamber arrays for IMRT dose verification: single-detector size and sampling step width , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Tom Depuydt,et al.  The use of an aSi-based EPID for routine absolute dosimetric pre-treatment verification of dynamic IMRT fields. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  Peter B Greer,et al.  Dosimetric properties of an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device for verification of dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy. , 2003, Medical physics.

[16]  D. Low,et al.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. , 1998, Medical physics.

[17]  S L Meeks,et al.  Optically guided intensity modulated radiotherapy. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  Benjamin E. Nelms,et al.  A survey on planar IMRT QA analysis , 2007, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.