Investigating consumers" tendency to combine multiple shopping purposes and destinations

Due to the increasing time pressure that they face, many consumers are becoming more concerned about the efficiency of their shopping patterns. Retailers have recognize this trend, have improved shopping convenience by offering greater variety in product categories and making it easier for consumers to combine visits to multiple stores. However, little is known about how consumers improve the efficiency of their shopping trips, or how changes in retail supply affect the way in which consumers combine multiple purposes and destinations. Building on previous work in consumer shopping trip modeling and conjoint design theory, this paper introduces a choice-based conjoint approach to studying and modeling this phenomenon. The approach is illustrated in a case study which investigated the tendency of Dutch shoppers to combine grocery, drugstore and clothing purchases across multiple shopping destinations. It was observed that the tendency of consumers to combine purchases differed from category to category and also depended on category availability. In general, consumers combined considerably less purchases than could be expected if their shopping trip planning were based purely on travel cost minimization.

[1]  H. Theil Principles of econometrics , 1971 .

[2]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations , 1983, Prentice Hall series in computational mathematics.

[3]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data , 1983 .

[4]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  Incorporating trip chaining into analysis of destination choice , 1984 .

[5]  Mark Dickie,et al.  Market Transactions and Hypothetical Demand Data: A Comparative Study , 1987 .

[6]  Sunil Gupta Impact of Sales Promotions on when, what, and how Much to Buy , 1988 .

[7]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Analyzing Decision Making , 1988 .

[8]  D. S. Bunch,et al.  Estimability in the Multinomial Probit Model , 1989 .

[9]  B. Kahn,et al.  Shopping trip behavior: An empirical investigation , 1989 .

[10]  Robert J. Meyer,et al.  The Optimality of Consumer Stockpiling Strategies , 1990 .

[11]  Naufel J. Vilcassim,et al.  Investigating Household Purchase Timing Decisions: A Conditional Hazard Function Approach , 1991 .

[12]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Experimental analysis of choice , 1991 .

[13]  T. Arentze,et al.  A model of multi-purpose shopping trip behavior , 1993 .

[14]  J. Louviere,et al.  The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models , 1993 .

[15]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A sequential approach to exploiting the combined strengths of SP and RP data: Application to freight shipper choice , 1994 .

[16]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Modeling Hierarchical Conjoint Processes with Integrated Choice Experiments , 1994 .

[17]  A. Kapteyn The measurement of household cost functions , 1994, Journal of population economics.

[18]  W. Kamakura,et al.  Modeling Preference and Structural Heterogeneity in Consumer Choice , 1996 .

[19]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  Conjoint choice models of joint participation and activity choice , 1996 .

[20]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Consumer activity pattern choice Development and test of stage-dependent conjoint choice experiments , 1997 .