Evaluation of threshold stress for bone resorption around screws based on in vivo strain measurement of miniplate.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the critical threshold stress causing bone resorption evaluated from strain measurement in vivo, comparing the various finite element models. In this study strains of miniplates used for mandibular fractures were measured once a week until the strains reduced. The maximum bite force for each patient was applied in the incisal, right molar and left molar region. The strains increased and reached a peak level at 2-4 weeks, whereas the bite forces increased during the period of measurements. A 3-D osteosynthesis model using finite element method showed that the compressive stresses of the bone surrounding screws ranged within approximately -40 MPa under the condition generating the same amounts of strains measured in the miniplates. Furthermore, various finite element models simulating mandibular reconstruction using the fibular graft were constructed. The models for reconstruction using single strut fibula showed distinct stress concentration in the cortical bone surrounding screws, and the peak stress levels were 2 to 3 times as strong as that of the fracture model. We conclude that critical threshold for bone resorption should be approximately -50 MPa (3600 micro strain).

[1]  L. Lanyon,et al.  In vivo strain measurements from bone and prosthesis following total hip replacement. An experimental study in sheep. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  D. Carter,et al.  Cyclic mechanical property degradation during fatigue loading of cortical bone. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  D B Burr,et al.  In vivo measurement of human tibial strains during vigorous activity. , 1996, Bone.

[4]  N. Nishimura Serial strain gauge measurement of bone healing in hoffmann® external fixation. , 1984, Orthopedics.

[5]  M M Panjabi,et al.  The four biomechanical stages of fracture repair. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  M Champy,et al.  Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal approach. , 1978, Journal of maxillofacial surgery.

[7]  T R Katona,et al.  Stress analysis of bone modeling response to rat molar orthodontics. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  M. Taylor,et al.  Fatigue failure of cancellous bone: a possible cause of implant migration and loosening. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  J. Fisher,et al.  Finite Element Stress and Strain Analysis of the Bone Surrounding a Dental Implant: Effect of Variations in Bone Modulus , 1992, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[10]  T. Lyberg,et al.  The vascularized fibular flap for mandibular reconstruction. , 1991, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[11]  J Chen,et al.  Mechanical simulation of the human mandible with and without an endosseous implant. , 1994, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  H. Frost Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 2. Redefining Wolff's Law: The remodeling problem , 1990, The Anatomical record.

[13]  J L Cunningham,et al.  Measuring stiffness can define healing of tibial fractures. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  G. Funk,et al.  Osseointegrated implants: a comparative study of bone thickness in four vascularized bone flaps. , 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.