Supervising Unethical Salesforce Behavior

Supervisory reactions of sales managers to potentially unethical salesperson behavior are examined in a national survey of sales executives. Four scenarios representing ethical issues were presented to the respondents. Salesperson overall work performance, organizational consequences, and gender significantly influenced various supervisory reactions; however, consequence and work performance influences were observed more consistently. Gender differences were marginal and generally confined to only two issues. The findings indicate that sales managers are more likely to use a harsher form of disciplinary action when poor performers, negative consequences, and salesmen are involved in unethical behavior.

[1]  W. Schmidt,et al.  Ethics in american companies: A managerial perspective , 1987 .

[2]  Gene R. Laczniak,et al.  The influence of stated organizational concern upon ethical decision making , 1987 .

[3]  John O. Summers,et al.  Checking the Success of Manipulations in Marketing Experiments , 1986 .

[4]  S. Hunt,et al.  A General Theory of Marketing Ethics , 1986 .

[5]  Lawrence B. Chonko,et al.  Ethics and marketing management: An empirical examination , 1985 .

[6]  J. M. Beyer,et al.  A Field Study of the Use and Perceived Effects of Discipline in Controlling Work Performance , 1984 .

[7]  Lawrence B. Chonko,et al.  Ethical Problems of Marketing Researchers , 1984 .

[8]  P. M. Podsakoff Determinants of a Supervisor's use of rewards and punishmens: A literature review and suggestions for further research☆☆☆ , 1982 .

[9]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Poor performers: Supervisors' and subordinates' responses , 1981 .

[10]  R. Hasty,et al.  Integrating Ethical Considerations Into Marketing Courses: the Role of the Marketing Professor , 1980 .

[11]  O. C. Ferrell,et al.  Ethical Beliefs of Marketing Managers , 1978 .

[12]  William S. Davidson,et al.  Sex Differences in Learned Helplessness: II. The Contingencies of Evaluative Feedback in the Classroom and III. An Experimental Analysis , 1978 .

[13]  William S. Davidson,et al.  Sex differences in learned helplessness: II. The contingencies of evaluative feedback in the classroom and III. An experimental analysis. , 1978 .

[14]  J. Finn A General Model for Multivariate Analysis , 1978 .

[15]  J. Bowman Managerial ethics in business and government , 1976 .

[16]  J C Barrow Worker performance and task complexity as causal determinants of leader behavior style and flexibility. , 1976, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  D. Ilgen,et al.  A theoretical approach to sex discrimination in traditionally masculine occupations , 1975 .

[18]  B. Rosen,et al.  Factors influencing disciplinary judgments. , 1974 .

[19]  K. Deaux,et al.  When women are more deserving than men: Equity, attribution, and perceived sex differences. , 1973 .

[20]  D. I. Hawkins,et al.  Student Evaluations of the Ethics of Marketing Practices: The Role of Marketing Education , 1972 .

[21]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[22]  Aaron Lowin,et al.  The influence of level of performance on managerial style: an experimental object-lesson in the ambiguity of correlational data , 1968 .

[23]  A. Carr,et al.  Is business bluffing ethical , 1968 .