MRI-localized biopsies reveal subtype-specific differences in molecular and cellular composition at the margins of glioblastoma

Significance Molecular analysis of surgically resected glioblastomas (GBM) samples has uncovered phenotypically and clinically distinct tumor subtypes. However, little is known about the molecular features of the glioma margins that are left behind after surgery. To address this key issue, we performed RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) and histological analysis on MRI-guided biopsies from the contrast-enhancing core and nonenhancing margins of GBM. Computational deconvolution of the RNA-seq data revealed that cellular composition, including nonneoplastic cells, is a major determinant of the expression patterns at the margins of GBM. The different GBM subtypes show distinct expression patterns that relate the contrast enhancing centers to the nonenhancing margins of tumors. Understanding these patterns may provide a means to infer the molecular and cellular features of residual disease. Glioblastomas (GBMs) diffusely infiltrate the brain, making complete removal by surgical resection impossible. The mixture of neoplastic and nonneoplastic cells that remain after surgery form the biological context for adjuvant therapeutic intervention and recurrence. We performed RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) and histological analysis on radiographically guided biopsies taken from different regions of GBM and showed that the tissue contained within the contrast-enhancing (CE) core of tumors have different cellular and molecular compositions compared with tissue from the nonenhancing (NE) margins of tumors. Comparisons with the The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset showed that the samples from CE regions resembled the proneural, classical, or mesenchymal subtypes of GBM, whereas the samples from the NE regions predominantly resembled the neural subtype. Computational deconvolution of the RNA-seq data revealed that contributions from nonneoplastic brain cells significantly influence the expression pattern in the NE samples. Gene ontology analysis showed that the cell type-specific expression patterns were functionally distinct and highly enriched in genes associated with the corresponding cell phenotypes. Comparing the RNA-seq data from the GBM samples to that of nonneoplastic brain revealed that the differentially expressed genes are distributed across multiple cell types. Notably, the patterns of cell type-specific alterations varied between the different GBM subtypes: the NE regions of proneural tumors were enriched in oligodendrocyte progenitor genes, whereas the NE regions of mesenchymal GBM were enriched in astrocytic and microglial genes. These subtype-specific patterns provide new insights into molecular and cellular composition of the infiltrative margins of GBM.

[1]  Se Hoon Kim,et al.  Mesenchymal differentiation mediated by NF-κB promotes radiation resistance in glioblastoma. , 2013, Cancer cell.

[2]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Cell type–specific gene expression differences in complex tissues , 2010, Nature Methods.

[3]  Birgitta Lannering,et al.  Age‐dependent sensitivity of the developing brain to irradiation is correlated with the number and vulnerability of progenitor cells , 2005, Journal of neurochemistry.

[4]  Andrea Califano,et al.  The transcriptional regulatory network of proneural glioma determines the genetic alterations selected during tumor progression. , 2014, Cancer research.

[5]  Y. Xing,et al.  A Transcriptome Database for Astrocytes, Neurons, and Oligodendrocytes: A New Resource for Understanding Brain Development and Function , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  R. Myers,et al.  A neurodegeneration-specific gene-expression signature of acutely isolated microglia from an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mouse model. , 2013, Cell reports.

[7]  J. D. de Groot,et al.  Acquired Resistance to Anti-VEGF Therapy in Glioblastoma Is Associated with a Mesenchymal Transition , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  V. P. Collins,et al.  Intratumor heterogeneity in human glioblastoma reflects cancer evolutionary dynamics , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  P. Benos,et al.  Mesenchymal glioma stem cells are maintained by activated glycolytic metabolism involving aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A3 , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  B. Barres,et al.  Genomic Analysis of Reactive Astrogliosis , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  M. Assanah,et al.  Convection-enhanced delivery of topotecan into a PDGF-driven model of glioblastoma prolongs survival and ablates both tumor-initiating cells and recruited glial progenitors. , 2011, Cancer research.

[12]  Thomas D. Wu,et al.  Molecular subclasses of high-grade glioma predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesis. , 2006, Cancer cell.

[13]  M. Foti,et al.  Sox2 is required to maintain cancer stem cells in a mouse model of high-grade oligodendroglioma. , 2014, Cancer research.

[14]  M. Berger,et al.  Increased Microglia/Macrophage Gene Expression in a Subset of Adult and Pediatric Astrocytomas , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  Toshihiko Wakabayashi,et al.  Immunohistochemical analysis‐based proteomic subclassification of newly diagnosed glioblastomas , 2012, Cancer science.

[16]  D. Wirth,et al.  Patterns of Gene-Specific and Total Transcriptional Activity during the Plasmodium falciparum Intraerythrocytic Developmental Cycle , 2009, Eukaryotic Cell.

[17]  Mark Noble,et al.  CNS progenitor cells and oligodendrocytes are targets of chemotherapeutic agents in vitro and in vivo , 2006, Journal of biology.

[18]  E. Holland,et al.  Astrocyte-Specific Expression Patterns Associated with the PDGF-Induced Glioma Microenvironment , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Sox2 promotes malignancy in glioblastoma by regulating plasticity and astrocytic differentiation. , 2014, Neoplasia.

[20]  T. Ludwig,et al.  Glioblastoma Models Reveal the Connection between Adult Glial Progenitors and the Proneural Phenotype , 2011, PloS one.

[21]  J. Szustakowski,et al.  Optimal Deconvolution of Transcriptional Profiling Data Using Quadratic Programming with Application to Complex Clinical Blood Samples , 2011, PloS one.

[22]  J. Uhm Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways , 2009 .

[23]  Yuan Qi,et al.  Integrated Genomic Analysis Identifies Clinically Relevant Subtypes of Glioblastoma Characterized by Abnormalities in PDGFRA , IDH 1 , EGFR , and NF 1 Citation Verhaak , 2010 .

[24]  Guy M McKhann,et al.  Phenotypic Heterogeneity and Plasticity of Isocortical and Hippocampal Astrocytes in the Human Brain , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  R. Faull,et al.  Population-specific expression analysis (PSEA) reveals molecular changes in diseased brain , 2011, Nature Methods.

[26]  J. Huse,et al.  Osteopontin-CD44 signaling in the glioma perivascular niche enhances cancer stem cell phenotypes and promotes aggressive tumor growth. , 2014, Cell stem cell.