Evaluation of MODIS Aerosol Optical Depth and Surface Data Using an Ensemble Modeling Approach to Assess PM2.5 Temporal and Spatial Distributions

The use of statistical models and machine-learning techniques along satellite-derived aerosol optical depth (AOD) is a promising method to estimate ground-level particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of ≤2.5 μm (PM2.5), mainly in urban areas with low air quality monitor density. Nevertheless, the relationship between AOD and ground-level PM2.5 varies spatiotemporally and differences related to spatial domains, temporal schemes, and seasonal variations must be assessed. Here, an ensemble multiple linear regression (EMLR) model and an ensemble neural network (ENN) model were developed to estimate PM2.5 levels in the Monterrey Metropolitan Area (MMA), the second largest urban center in Mexico. Four AOD-SDSs (Scientific Datasets) from MODIS Collection 6 were tested using three spatial domains and two temporal schemes. The best model performance was obtained using AOD at 0.55 µm from MODIS-Aqua at a spatial resolution of 3 km, along meteorological parameters and daily scheme. EMLR yielded a correlation coefficient (R) of ~0.57 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of ~7.00 μg m−3. ENN performed better than EMLR, with an R of ~0.78 and RMSE of ~5.43 μg m−3. Satellite-derived AOD in combination with meteorology data allowed for the estimation of PM2.5 distributions in an urban area with low air quality monitor density.

[1]  Kasturi Devi Kanniah,et al.  Estimating Particulate Matter using satellite based aerosol optical depth and meteorological variables in Malaysia , 2017 .

[2]  G. Hagler,et al.  Opportunities and Challenges for Filling the Air Quality Data Gap in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. , 2019, Atmospheric environment.

[3]  E. Jáuregui Urban heat island development in medium and large urban areas in Mexico , 1987 .

[4]  Lorraine A. Remer,et al.  MODIS 3 km aerosol product: algorithm and global perspective , 2013 .

[5]  Xiangao Xia,et al.  Diurnal and seasonal variability of PM2.5 and AOD in North China plain: Comparison of MERRA-2 products and ground measurements , 2018, Atmospheric Environment.

[6]  Liang-pei Zhang,et al.  Point-surface fusion of station measurements and satellite observations for mapping PM 2.5 distribution in China: Methods and assessment , 2016, 1607.02976.

[7]  S. Christopher,et al.  Remote Sensing of Particulate Pollution from Space: Have We Reached the Promised Land? , 2009, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[8]  A. Mendoza,et al.  Chemical characterization and factor analysis of PM2.5 in two sites of Monterrey, Mexico , 2012, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[9]  Kai Liu,et al.  Variability, predictability, and uncertainty in global aerosols inferred from gap-filled satellite observations and an econometric modeling approach , 2021 .

[10]  Space Observations of Dust in East Asia , 2017 .

[11]  Yang Liu,et al.  Estimating PM2.5 concentration of the conterminous United States via interpretable convolutional neural networks. , 2019, Environmental pollution.

[12]  Weiqi Zhou,et al.  Comparing Ground Operation-Measured and Remotely Sensed Fine-Particulate Matter Data: A case to validate the Dalhousie product in China , 2019, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine.

[13]  Andrew D. Foster,et al.  Remote sensing of ambient particles in Delhi and its environs: estimation and validation , 2008, International journal of remote sensing.

[14]  Jin Huang,et al.  Enhanced Deep Blue aerosol retrieval algorithm: The second generation , 2013 .

[15]  Yuqi Bai,et al.  Daily Estimation of Ground-Level PM2.5 Concentrations over Beijing Using 3 km Resolution MODIS AOD. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  A. Lacis,et al.  How well do satellite AOD observations represent the spatial and temporal variability of PM2.5 concentration for the United States , 2015 .

[17]  Sundar A. Christopher,et al.  Global Distribution of Column Satellite Aerosol Optical Depth to Surface PM2.5 Relationships , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[18]  M. Fraser,et al.  Organic composition and source apportionment of fine aerosol at Monterrey, Mexico, based on organic markers , 2016 .

[19]  B. Holben,et al.  Global monitoring of air pollution over land from the Earth Observing System-Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) , 2003 .

[20]  A. Just,et al.  Children's acute respiratory symptoms associated with PM2.5 estimates in two sequential representative surveys from the Mexico City Metropolitan Area. , 2019, Environmental research.

[21]  K. Clemitshaw,et al.  Observed trends in ground-level O 3 in Monterrey, Mexico, during 1993-2014: comparison with Mexico City and Guadalajara , 2017 .

[22]  M. Fraser,et al.  Chemical characterization of fine organic aerosol for source apportionment at Monterrey, Mexico , 2015 .

[23]  Jun Wang,et al.  Intercomparison between satellite‐derived aerosol optical thickness and PM2.5 mass: Implications for air quality studies , 2003 .

[24]  Xiao Feng,et al.  Prediction of hourly ground-level PM2.5 concentrations 3 days in advance using neural networks with satellite data in eastern China , 2017 .

[25]  Yan-lin Zhang,et al.  Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in China at a city level , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Weidong Li,et al.  Evaluating the Use of DMSP/OLS Nighttime Light Imagery in Predicting PM2.5 Concentrations in the Northeastern United States , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[27]  R. Marrett,et al.  Tectónica de la Sierra Madre Oriental, México , 2000 .

[28]  Zhongmin Zhu,et al.  A Review on Predicting Ground PM2.5 Concentration Using Satellite Aerosol Optical Depth , 2016 .

[29]  P. Gupta,et al.  Particulate matter air quality assessment using integrated surface, satellite, and meteorological products: Multiple regression approach , 2009 .

[30]  Lutz Prechelt,et al.  Automatic early stopping using cross validation: quantifying the criteria , 1998, Neural Networks.

[31]  Álvaro R. Osornio-Vargas,et al.  Aeroparticles, Composition, and Lung Diseases , 2016, Front. Immunol..

[32]  Xiaoyan Ma,et al.  Can MODIS AOD be employed to derive PM2.5 in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei over China? , 2016 .

[33]  L. Remer,et al.  The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean , 2013 .

[34]  Marco Andrés Guevara Luna,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Assessment of Particulate Matter Using AOD Data from MODIS and Surface Measurements in the Ambient Air of Colombia , 2018, Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment.

[35]  Jungho Im,et al.  Estimating ground-level particulate matter concentrations using satellite-based data: a review , 2020 .

[36]  A. Mendoza,et al.  Spatial differences in ambient coarse and fine particles in the Monterrey metropolitan area, Mexico: Implications for source contribution , 2019, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[37]  Robert C. Levy,et al.  MODIS Collection 6 aerosol products: Comparison between Aqua's e‐Deep Blue, Dark Target, and “merged” data sets, and usage recommendations , 2014 .

[38]  Yi Li,et al.  National-Scale Estimates of Ground-Level PM2.5 Concentration in China Using Geographically Weighted Regression Based on 3 km Resolution MODIS AOD , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[39]  N. I. Tanaka,et al.  Exploring the relationship between high-resolution aerosol optical depth values and ground-level particulate matter concentrations in the Metropolitan Area of São Paulo , 2021 .

[40]  Basil W. Coutant,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of MODIS satellite sensor data for regional and urban scale air quality , 2004 .

[41]  Alexei Lyapustin,et al.  Using High-Resolution Satellite Aerosol Optical Depth To Estimate Daily PM2.5 Geographical Distribution in Mexico City. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  R. Levy,et al.  Impact of California Fires on Local and Regional Air Quality: The Role of a Low‐Cost Sensor Network and Satellite Observations , 2018, GeoHealth.

[43]  Xiangao Xia,et al.  Long-term validation of MODIS C6 and C6.1 Dark Target aerosol products over China using CARSNET and AERONET. , 2019, Chemosphere.

[44]  R. Martin,et al.  Estimating ground-level PM2.5 using aerosol optical depth determined from satellite remote sensing , 2006 .

[45]  Qiuhong Tang,et al.  Estimating ground-level PM2.5 concentrations in Beijing using a satellite-based geographically and temporally weighted regression model , 2017 .

[46]  F. Yu,et al.  Seasonal variability of aerosol vertical profiles over east US and west Europe: GEOS-Chem/APM simulation and comparison with CALIPSO observations , 2014 .

[47]  M. Fraser,et al.  Secondary organic aerosol contributions to PM2.5 in Monterrey, Mexico: Temporal and seasonal variation , 2015 .

[48]  Yang Liu,et al.  Developing an Advanced PM2.5 Exposure Model in Lima, Peru , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[49]  Pawan Gupta,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Distribution of PM2.5 Pollution over Northeastern Mexico: Application of MERRA-2 Reanalysis Datasets , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[50]  Meigen Zhang,et al.  Modeling study on seasonal variation in aerosol extinction properties over China. , 2014, Journal of environmental sciences.

[51]  Gabriela Aparicio,et al.  Gender Gaps in Birth Weight Across Latin America: Evidence on the Role of Air Pollution , 2019, Journal of Economics, Race, and Policy.

[52]  K. Hubacek,et al.  The characteristics and drivers of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) distribution in China , 2017 .

[53]  Yun Zeng,et al.  Progress in developing an ANN model for air pollution index forecast , 2004 .

[54]  P. Gupta,et al.  Particulate Matter Air Quality Assessment using Integrated Surface, Satellite, and Meteorological Products , 2009 .

[55]  M. G. Estes,et al.  Estimating ground-level PM(2.5) concentrations in the southeastern U.S. using geographically weighted regression. , 2013, Environmental research.