Investigating student interactions with tutorial dialogues in EER-Tutor

Eye-movement tracking and student-system interaction logs provide different types of information which can be used as a potential source of real-time adaptation in learning environments. By analysing student interactions with an intelligent tutoring system (ITS), we can identify sub-optimal behaviour such as not paying attention to important interface components. On the basis of such findings, ITSs can be enhanced to be proactive, rather than reactive, to users’ actions. Tutorial dialogues are one of the teaching strategies used in ITSs which has been shown empirically to significantly improve learning. Enhanced entity-relationship (EER)-Tutor is a constraint-based ITS that teaches conceptual database design. This paper presents the preliminary results of a project that investigates how students interact with the tutorial dialogues in EER-Tutor using both eye-gaze data and student-system interaction logs. Our findings indicate that advanced students are selective of the interface areas they visually focus on, whereas novices waste time by paying attention to interface areas that are inappropriate for the task at hand. Novices are also unaware that they require help with the tutorial dialogues. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that the student’s prior knowledge, the problem complexity and the percentage of the dialogue’s prompts that are answered correctly are factors that can be used to predict future errors. The findings from our study can be used to further enhance EER-Tutor in order to support learning better, including real-time classification of students into novices and advanced students in order to adapt system feedback and interventions.

[1]  Ramez Elmasri,et al.  Fundamentals of Database Systems , 1989 .

[2]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  Towards Individualized Dialogue Support for Ill-Defined Domains , 2009, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[3]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  The Beginning of a Beautiful Friendship? Intelligent Tutoring Systems and MOOCs , 2015, AIED.

[4]  Huei-Tse Hou,et al.  Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  Feedback Micro-engineering in EER-Tutor , 2005, AIED.

[6]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  An Intelligent Tutoring System for Entity Relationship Modelling , 2004, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[7]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Illustrating Principled Design: The Early Evolution of a Cognitive Tutor for Algebra Symbolization , 1998, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[8]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Tutorial Dialogue System for Self-Explanation , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[9]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  Andes: A Coached Problem Solving Environment for Physics , 2000, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[10]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  Facilitating deep learning through self-explanation in an open-ended domain , 2006, Int. J. Knowl. Based Intell. Eng. Syst..

[11]  Joseph C. Hickox,et al.  COMPARISON OF EXPERT AND NOVICE SCAN BEHAVIORS DURING VFR FLIGHT , 2001 .

[12]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Comparing information graphics: a critical look at eye tracking , 2010, BELIV '10.

[13]  Matthew W. Lewis,et al.  Self-Explonations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  Supporting Deep Learning in an Open-ended Domain , 2005 .

[15]  Moffat Mathews,et al.  Do Your Eyes Give It Away? Using Eye Tracking Data to Understand Students' Attitudes towards Open Student Model Representations , 2012, ITS.

[16]  Cristina Conati,et al.  User-Adaptive Visualizations: Can Gaze Data Tell Us When a User Needs Them? , 2011, Scalable Integration of Analytics and Visualization.

[17]  Matthew A North,et al.  Data Mining for the Masses , 2012 .

[18]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Why/AutoTutor: A Test of Learning Gains from a Physics Tutor with Natural Language Dialog , 2003 .

[19]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Broader Bandwidth in Student Modeling: What if ITS were "Eye"TS? , 2000, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[20]  M. Stella Atkins,et al.  Eye gaze patterns differentiate novice and experts in a virtual laparoscopic surgery training environment , 2004, ETRA.

[21]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  Evaluating a General Model of Adaptive Tutorial Dialogues , 2011, AIED.

[22]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Eye-tracking for user modeling in exploratory learning environments: An empirical evaluation , 2007, Knowl. Based Syst..

[23]  Shahram Eivazi,et al.  Predicting Problem-Solving Behavior and Performance Levels from Visual Attention Data , 2011 .

[24]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  The Architecture of Why2-Atlas: A Coach for Qualitative Physics Essay Writing , 2002, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[25]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Tutoring Answer Explanation Fosters Learning with Understanding , 1999 .

[26]  T. Gog,et al.  In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli , 2010 .

[27]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Tutorial Dialog in Natural Language , 2010, Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[28]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Content analysis: What are they talking about? , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[29]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .

[30]  Susan Bull,et al.  Visual Attention in Open Learner Model Presentations: An Eye-Tracking Investigation , 2007, User Modeling.

[31]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Generating Accurate Rule Sets Without Global Optimization , 1998, ICML.

[32]  Ingo Mierswa,et al.  YALE: rapid prototyping for complex data mining tasks , 2006, KDD '06.

[33]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics , 2010 .

[34]  Hua Wang,et al.  Empathic tutoring software agents using real-time eye tracking , 2006, ETRA '06.

[35]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Exploring gaze data for determining user learning with an interactive simulation , 2012, UMAP.

[36]  Kasia Muldner,et al.  ON IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF OPEN LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS THROUGH TAILORED SUPPORT FOR EXPLORATION , 2001 .

[37]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  A Preliminary Study of a General Model for Supporting Tutorial Dialogues , 2008 .