Tuning Attention to Object Categories: Spatially Global Effects of Attention to Faces in Visual Processing

Feature-based attention is known to enhance visual processing globally across the visual field, even at task-irrelevant locations. Here, we asked whether attention to object categories, in particular faces, shows similar location-independent tuning. Using EEG, we measured the face-selective N170 component of the EEG signal to examine neural responses to faces at task-irrelevant locations while participants attended to faces at another task-relevant location. Across two experiments, we found that visual processing of faces was amplified at task-irrelevant locations when participants attended to faces relative to when participants attended to either buildings or scrambled face parts. The fact that we see this enhancement with the N170 suggests that these attentional effects occur at the earliest stage of face processing. Two additional behavioral experiments showed that it is easier to attend to the same object category across the visual field relative to two distinct categories, consistent with object-based attention spreading globally. Together, these results suggest that attention to high-level object categories shows similar spatially global effects on visual processing as attention to simple, individual, low-level features.

[1]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[2]  George A. Alvarez,et al.  The Role of Meaning in Visual Memory: Face-Selective Brain Activity Predicts Memory for Ambiguous Face Stimuli , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  G. Boynton,et al.  Feature-Based Attentional Modulations in the Absence of Direct Visual Stimulation , 2007, Neuron.

[4]  Giorgio Ganis,et al.  The N170, not the P1, indexes the earliest time for categorical perception of faces, regardless of interstimulus variance , 2012, NeuroImage.

[5]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  Ole Jensen,et al.  Frontal Eye Fields Control Attentional Modulation of Alpha and Gamma Oscillations in Contralateral Occipitoparietal Cortex , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Eimer The Face-Sensitive N170 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential , 2011 .

[9]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Is the face‐sensitive N170 the only ERP not affected by selective attention? , 2000, Neuroreport.

[10]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  Neural mechanisms of rapid natural scene categorization in human visual cortex , 2009, Nature.

[11]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Jens Schwarzbach,et al.  Control of object-based attention in human cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[14]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Marty G. Woldorff,et al.  Face Processing is Gated by Visual Spatial Attention , 2007, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[16]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[17]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Object-Based Attention , 2014, Science.

[18]  D. Regan Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[19]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Global Facilitation of Attended Features Is Obligatory and Restricts Divided Attention , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170 , 2008, NeuroImage.

[21]  Cathy Craig,et al.  Using Time-to-Contact Information to Assess Potential Collision Modulates Both Visual and Temporal Prediction Networks , 2008, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[22]  Joshua B. Ewen,et al.  Inhibition Drives Early Feature-Based Attention , 2014, Psychological science.

[23]  M. Eimer Event-related potential correlates of transient attention shifts to color and location , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[24]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Sustained Multifocal Attentional Enhancement of Stimulus Processing in Early Visual Areas Predicts Tracking Performance , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  L. Trahms,et al.  Looking for faces: Attention modulates early occipitotemporal object processing. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[26]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to the color and direction of moving stimuli: Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical feature selection , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The strength of anticipatory spatial biasing predicts target discrimination at attended locations: a high‐density EEG study , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Visual search for object categories is predicted by the representational architecture of high-level visual cortex. , 2017, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  B. Renault,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of facial decision: insights from upright and upside-down Mooney-face perception. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[31]  S. Luck,et al.  Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  Antígona Martínez,et al.  Salient, Irrelevant Sounds Reflexively Induce Alpha Rhythm Desynchronization in Parallel with Slow Potential Shifts in Visual Cortex , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  Viola S. Störmer,et al.  Feature-Based Attention Elicits Surround Suppression in Feature Space , 2014, Current Biology.

[34]  F. Tong,et al.  Neural mechanisms of object-based attention. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Javier DeFelipe,et al.  The Grand Challenge , 2020 .

[36]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Object-based attention involves the sequential activation of feature-specific cortical modules , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  D. Jeffreys Evoked Potential Studies of Face and Object Processing , 1996 .

[39]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Anticipatory Biasing of Visuospatial Attention Indexed by Retinotopically Specific α-Bank Electroencephalography Increases over Occipital Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Feature-based attention in visual cortex , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[41]  James J. DiCarlo,et al.  How Does the Brain Solve Visual Object Recognition? , 2012, Neuron.

[42]  James A Desjardins,et al.  Deconstructing the early visual electrocortical responses to face and house stimuli. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[43]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Covert visual attention modulates face-specific activity in the human fusiform gyrus: fMRI study. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[45]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The selectivity of the occipitotemporal M170 for faces , 2000, Neuroreport.

[46]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[47]  B. Rossion Understanding face perception by means of human electrophysiology , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.