Changes in physical workload with implementation of mouse-based information technology in air traffic control

Effects on physical workload were quantified when introducing new information technology in air traffic control. Seven female and 7 male air traffic controllers were studied in an old control system, and during simulated-but similar-work in a new, mouse-based system. Postures, movements and muscular load were recorded (inclinometry for head, neck, back and upper arms; goniometry for wrists; elect romyography for the trapezius and forearm extensor muscles). The new system was associated with lower movement velocities than the old one (examples: [50th percentiles] head flexion: 2 vs. 5 degrees/s, P < 0.01; right arm elevation: 3 vs. 6 degrees/s; P < 0.01; [90th percentile] wrist flexion: 19 vs. 50 degrees/s, P < 0.01), less varying postures (head: 95th-5th percentile range 17 degrees vs. 34 degrees; P < 0.01), and less muscular rest in the right forearm extensors (3.5% vs. 9% of time; P < 0.05). The old/new system differences were amplified at high work intensities. The new air traffic control system caused a major change of physical exposures, probably associated with an increased risk of musculoskeletal disorders in arms and hands. Relevance to industry While this study concerned the specific changes in the introduction of a new air traffic control system, we believe that the findings are applicable to similar technological developments in other settings. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. (Less)

[1]  Mikael Forsman,et al.  Low-threshold motor unit activity during a 1-h static contraction in the trapezius muscle , 2002 .

[2]  S Skerfving,et al.  Musculoskeletal disorders among female and male air traffic controllers performing identical and demanding computer work , 2006, Ergonomics.

[3]  G. Hansson,et al.  Validity and reliability of triaxial accelerometers for inclinometry in posture analysis , 2001, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[4]  S E Mathiassen,et al.  Precision of measurements of physical workload during standardised manual handling. Part I: surface electromyography of m. trapezius, m. infraspinatus and the forearm extensors. , 2004, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[5]  S E Mathiassen,et al.  Precision of measurements of physical workload during standardised manual handling. Part II: Inclinometry of head, upper back, neck and upper arms. , 2006, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[6]  K Ohlsson,et al.  Interindividual variation of physical load in a work task. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[7]  L Finsen,et al.  Job demands, muscle activity and musculoskeletal symptoms in relation to work with the computer mouse. , 1998, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[8]  Anker Helms Jørgensen,et al.  Effect of mental and physical demands on muscular activity during the use of a computer mouse and a keyboard. , 2002, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[9]  S E Mathiassen,et al.  Physiological comparison of three interventions in light assembly work: reduced work pace, increased break allowance and shortened working days , 1996, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[10]  Arthur I. Siegbl,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF CAUTIONARY SIGNAL PRESENTATIONS , 1960 .

[11]  Kerstina Ohlsson,et al.  Physical workload on neck and upper limb using two CAD applications. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  A prospective study of computer users: I. Study design and incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. , 2002, American journal of industrial medicine.

[13]  K Ohlsson,et al.  Goniometer measurement and computer analysis of wrist angles and movements applied to occupational repetitive work. , 1996, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[14]  Roland Kadefors,et al.  Effects of experimentally induced mental and physical stress on motor unit recruitment in the trapezius muscle , 2002 .

[15]  Kari Anne Holte,et al.  Further studies of shoulder and neck pain and exposures in customer service work with low biomechanical demands , 2002, Ergonomics.

[16]  R H Westgaard,et al.  Trapezius muscle activity as a risk indicator for shoulder and neck pain in female service workers with low biomechanical exposure , 2001, Ergonomics.

[17]  L Finsen,et al.  Acute response to precision, time pressure and mental demand during simulated computer work. , 2000, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[18]  M Hagberg,et al.  Differences between work methods and gender in computer mouse use. , 2000, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[19]  T. Läubli,et al.  Continuous, intermitted and sporadic motor unit activity in the trapezius muscle during prolonged computer work. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[20]  T. Läubli,et al.  Motor-unit activity in the trapezius muscle during rest, while inputting data, and during fast finger tapping , 2000, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[21]  Fredric Gerr,et al.  A prospective study of computer users: II. Postural risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. , 2002, American journal of industrial medicine.

[22]  Sigurd Mikkelsen,et al.  Neck and shoulder symptoms and disorders among Danish computer workers. , 2004, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[23]  Kerstina Ohlsson,et al.  Gender differences in workers with identical repetitive industrial tasks: exposure and musculoskeletal disorders , 2008, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[24]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Efficient one-day sampling of mechanical job exposure data--a study based on upper trapezius activity in cleaners and office workers. , 2003, AIHA journal : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[25]  J P Psihogios,et al.  A field evaluation of monitor placement effects in VDT users. , 2001, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  R. Westgaard,et al.  Attention-related muscle activity in different body regions during VDU work with minimal physical activity. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[27]  M Thoresen,et al.  Musculoskeletal, visual and psychosocial stress in VDU operators before and after multidisciplinary ergonomic interventions. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[28]  Thomas Läubli,et al.  Co-activity of the trapezius and upper arm muscles with finger tapping at different rates and trunk postures , 2000, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[29]  Allan Toomingas,et al.  Self-reported working conditions of VDU operators and associations with musculoskeletal symptoms : a cross-sectional study focussing on gender differences , 2002 .

[30]  J. H. Andersen,et al.  Does computer use pose an occupational hazard for forearm pain; from the NUDATA study , 2003, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[31]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Statistical power and measurement allocation in ergonomic intervention studies assessing upper trapezius EMG amplitude. A case study of assembly work. , 2002, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[32]  Mats Hagberg,et al.  Computer mouse and track-ball operation:: Similarities and differences in posture, muscular load and perceived exertion , 1999 .

[33]  E. Viikari-Juntura,et al.  Work related and individual predictors for incident neck pain among office employees working with video display units , 2003, Occupational and environmental medicine.