A quantitative analysis of sign lengthening in American Sign Language

In spoken languages, disfluent speech, narrative effects, discourse information, and phrase position may influence the lengthening of segments beyond their typical duration. In sign languages, however, the primary use of the visual-gestural modality results in articulatory differences not expressed in spoken languages. This paper looks at sign lengthening in American Sign Language (ASL). Comparing two retellings of the Pear Story narrative from five signers, three primary lengthening mechanisms were identified: elongation, repetition, and deceleration. These mechanisms allow signers to incorporate lengthening into signs which may benefit from decelerated language production due to high information load or complex articulatory processes. Using a mixed effects model, significant differences in duration were found between (i) non-conventionalized forms vs. lexical signs, (ii) signs produced during role shift vs. non-role shift, (iii) signs in phrase-final/initial vs. phrase-medial position, (iv) new vs. given information, and (v) (non-disordered) disfluent signing vs. non-disfluent signing. These results provide insights into duration effects caused by information load and articulatory processes in ASL.

[1]  C. Fowler,et al.  Talkers' signaling of new and old. words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction , 1987 .

[2]  M. Nespor,et al.  Prosody in Israeli Sign Language , 1999 .

[3]  J. McAllister,et al.  Final part-word repetitions in school-age children: two case studies. , 2005, Journal of fluency disorders.

[4]  S. Brennan,et al.  Disfluency Rates in Conversation: Effects of Age, Relationship, Topic, Role, and Gender , 2001, Language and speech.

[5]  R. Wilbur,et al.  The Duration of Syllables in American Sign Language , 1986, Language and speech.

[6]  Scott K. Liddell,et al.  American Sign Language: The Phonological Base , 2013 .

[7]  Robert M. Ingram,et al.  Theme, Rheme, Topic, and Comment in the Syntax of American Sign Language , 2013 .

[8]  Scott K. Liddell THINK AND BELIEVE: SEQUENTIALITY IN AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE , 1984 .

[9]  John W. Du Bois The Discourse Basis of Ergativity , 1987 .

[10]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages , 2003 .

[11]  R. Wilbur,et al.  Stress in A SL: Empirical Evidence and Linguistic I ssues , 1999, Language and speech.

[12]  Judy Anne Kegl Clitics in American Sign Language , 1986 .

[13]  Wendy Sandler,et al.  The Spreading Hand Autosegment of American Sign Language , 2013 .

[14]  Ronnie B. Wilbur,et al.  SYLLABLES AND SEGMENTS: HOLD THE MOVEMENT AND MOVE THE HOLDS! , 1993 .

[15]  Paul G. Dudis Body partitioning and real-space blends , 2004 .

[16]  Colin W. Wightman,et al.  Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Terry Janzen Space rotation, perspective shift, and verb morphology in ASL , 2004 .

[18]  Nancy J. Frishberg ARBITRARINESS AND ICONICITY: HISTORICAL CHANGE IN AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE , 1975 .

[19]  Onno Crasborn,et al.  The phonology of focus in Sign Language of the Netherlands , 2013 .

[20]  Stefan Oltean,et al.  A survey of the pragmatic and referential functions of free indirect discourse , 1993 .

[21]  Gladys Tang,et al.  Sign Languages: Crosslinguistic variation in prosodic cues , 2010 .

[22]  W. Sandler,et al.  Visual intonation in two sign languages* , 2013, Phonology.

[23]  Kari Suomi,et al.  Utterance-final lengthening and quantity in Northern Finnish , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[24]  D. Klatt Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  D. Klatt Vowel Lengthening is Syntactically Determined in a Connected Discourse. , 1975 .

[26]  Diane Brentari,et al.  FOREIGN VOCABULARY IN SIGN LANGUAGES: A CROSS-LINGUISTIC INVESTIGATION OF WORD FORMATION. Diane Brentari (Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2001. Pp. xx + 186. $49.95 cloth. , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[27]  K. Green Sign Boundaries in American Sign Language , 2013 .

[28]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words , 2007, J. Phonetics.