Semantic Referencing - Determining Context Weights for Similarity Measurement

Semantic similarity measurement is a key methodology in various domains ranging from cognitive science to geographic information retrieval on the Web. Meaningful notions of similarity, however, cannot be determined without taking additional contextual information into account. One way to make similarity measures context-aware is by introducing weights for specific characteristics. Existing approaches to automatically determine such weights are rather limited or require application specific adjustments. In the past, the possibility to tweak similarity theories until they fit a specific use case has been one of the major criticisms for their evaluation. In this work, we propose a novel approach to semi-automatically adapt similarity theories to the user's needs and hence make them context-aware. Our methodology is inspired by the process of georeferencing images in which known control points between the image and geographic space are used to compute a suitable transformation. We propose to semi-automatically calibrate weights to compute inter-instance and inter-concept similarities by allowing the user to adjust pre-computed similarity rankings. These known control similarities are then used to reference other similarity values.

[1]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Reasoning about Categories in Conceptual Spaces , 2001, IJCAI.

[2]  Douglas R. Hofstadter,et al.  Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid , 1981 .

[3]  Achille C. Varzi,et al.  Formal Ontology in Information Systems : proceedings of the Third International Conference (FOIS-2004) , 2004 .

[4]  Enrico Motta,et al.  The Semantic Web - ISWC 2005, 4th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2005, Galway, Ireland, November 6-10, 2005, Proceedings , 2005, SEMWEB.

[5]  Angela Schwering,et al.  Approaches to Semantic Similarity Measurement for Geo‐Spatial Data: A Survey , 2008, Trans. GIS.

[6]  Michela Bertolotto,et al.  Perspectives in Conceptual Modeling, ER 2005 Workshops AOIS, BP-UML, CoMoGIS, eCOMO, and QoIS, Klagenfurt, Austria, October 24-28, 2005, Proceedings , 2005, ER.

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Representations of qualitative and quantitative dimensions. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  Kinds of Contexts and their Impact on Semantic Similarity Measurement , 2008, 2008 Sixth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom).

[9]  Angela Schwering,et al.  Spatial Relations for Semantic Similarity Measurement , 2005, ER.

[10]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Spatial Similarity Queries with Logical Operators , 2003, SSTD.

[11]  Michael D. Lee,et al.  Combining Dimensions and Features in Similarity-Based Representations , 2002, NIPS.

[12]  Gerd Kortuem,et al.  Smart Sensing and Context, Second European Conference, EuroSSC 2007, Kendal, England, UK, October 23-25, 2007, Proceedings , 2007, EuroSSC.

[13]  Martin Raubal,et al.  Semantic Rules for Context-Aware Geographical Information Retrieval , 2009, EuroSSC.

[14]  Benjamin Adams,et al.  A Metric Conceptual Space Algebra , 2009, COSIT.

[15]  Florian Probst,et al.  Constructing Bodies and their Qualities from Observations , 2010, FOIS.

[16]  N. Foo Conceptual Spaces—The Geometry of Thought , 2022 .

[17]  Carsten Keßler,et al.  What is the difference? A cognitive dissimilarity measure for information retrieval result sets , 2012, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[18]  M. Raubal Formalizing Conceptual Spaces , 2004 .

[19]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Comparing geospatial entity classes: an asymmetric and context-dependent similarity measure , 2004, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[20]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  SIM-DLA: A Novel Semantic Similarity Measure for Description Logics Reducing Inter-concept to Inter-instance Similarity , 2009, ESWC.

[21]  Ola Ahlqvist,et al.  In Search of Classification that Supports the Dynamics of Science: The FAO Land Cover Classification System and Proposed Modifications , 2008 .

[22]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning , 2005 .

[23]  D. Hofstadter,et al.  Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid@@@Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid , 1980 .

[24]  Stephan Winter,et al.  Spatial Information Theory, 8th International Conference, COSIT 2007, Melbourne, Australia, September 19-23, 2007, Proceedings , 2007, COSIT.

[25]  D. Gentner,et al.  Respects for similarity , 1993 .

[26]  Chengyang Zhang,et al.  Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases , 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[27]  Ola Ahlqvist,et al.  Extending post-classification change detection using semantic similarity metrics to overcome class heterogeneity: A study of 1992 and 2001 U.S. National Land Cover Database changes , 2008 .

[28]  Sándor Dominich The Modern Algebra of Information Retrieval , 2008, The Information Retrieval Series.

[29]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  Implementation and Evaluation of a Semantics-based User Interface for Web Gazetteers , 2009 .

[30]  Edwina L. Rissland,et al.  AI and Similarity , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[31]  Frederico T. Fonseca,et al.  TDD - A Comprehensive Model for Qualitative Spatial Similarity Assessment , 2005 .

[32]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Toward the semantic geospatial web , 2002, GIS '02.

[33]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[34]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Similarity in context , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Lora Aroyo,et al.  The Semantic Web: Research and Applications , 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[36]  Robert L. Goldstone The role of similarity in categorization: providing a groundwork , 1994, Cognition.

[37]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Ontology Design Patterns for Semantic Web Content , 2005, SEMWEB.

[38]  Isabel F. Cruz,et al.  Structural Alignment Methods with Applications to Geospatial Ontologies , 2008, Trans. GIS.

[39]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  Similarity as a Quality Indicator in Ontology Engineering , 2008, FOIS.

[40]  K. Kraus Photogrammetry: Geometry from Images and Laser Scans , 2007 .