On the equivalence of gravimetric PM data with TEOM and beta-attenuation measurements
暂无分享,去创建一个
Boštjan Gomišček | Michael Kundi | Hans Puxbaum | B. Gomišček | M. Kundi | A. Berner | H. Hauck | S. Stopper | H. Puxbaum | O. Preining | Axel Berner | Helger Hauck | S Stopper | Othmar Preining
[1] A. Eisner,et al. Discussion and Evaluation of the Volatility Test for Equivalency of Other Methods to the Federal Reference Method for Fine Particulate Matter , 2002 .
[2] Thomas M. Peters,et al. Federal Reference and Equivalent Methods for Measuring Fine Particulate Matter , 2001 .
[3] J. Ambs,et al. Development of a Reference Standard for Particulate Matter Mass in Ambient Air , 2001 .
[4] F. Lurmann,et al. Evaluation of the TEOM method for measurement of ambient particulate mass in urban areas. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.
[5] Yanbo Pang,et al. PM 2.5 Semivolatile Organic Material at Riverside, California: Implications for the PM 2.5 Federal Reference Method Sampler , 2002 .
[6] B. Gomišček,et al. On the correlation of atmospheric aerosol components of mass size distributions in the larger region of a central European city , 2004 .
[7] B. Gomišček,et al. Spatial and temporal variations of PM1, PM2.5, PM10 and particle number concentration during the AUPHEP—project , 2004 .
[8] Continuous Determination of PM2.5 Mass, Including Semi-Volatile Species , 2001 .
[9] B. Gomišček,et al. A dual site study of PM2.5 and PM10 aerosol chemistry in the larger region of Vienna, Austria , 2004 .